Literature DB >> 29549552

High dynamic range ultrasound imaging.

Alperen Degirmenci1, Douglas P Perrin2,3, Robert D Howe4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: High dynamic range (HDR) imaging is a popular computational photography technique that has found its way into every modern smartphone and camera. In HDR imaging, images acquired at different exposures are combined to increase the luminance range of the final image, thereby extending the limited dynamic range of the camera. Ultrasound imaging suffers from limited dynamic range as well; at higher power levels, the hyperechogenic tissue is overexposed, whereas at lower power levels, hypoechogenic tissue details are not visible. In this work, we apply HDR techniques to ultrasound imaging, where we combine ultrasound images acquired at different power levels to improve the level of detail visible in the final image.
METHODS: Ultrasound images of ex vivo and in vivo tissue are acquired at different acoustic power levels and then combined to generate HDR ultrasound (HDR-US) images. The performance of five tone mapping operators is quantitatively evaluated using a similarity metric to determine the most suitable mapping for HDR-US imaging.
RESULTS: The ex vivo and in vivo results demonstrated that HDR-US imaging enables visualizing both hyper- and hypoechogenic tissue at once in a single image. The Durand tone mapping operator preserved the most amount of detail across the dynamic range.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results strongly suggest that HDR-US imaging can improve the utility of ultrasound in image-based diagnosis and procedure guidance.

Keywords:  Contrast enhancement; High dynamic range; Image enhancement; Tone mapping; Ultrasound imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29549552     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-018-1729-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  7 in total

1.  Frequency decomposition and compounding of ultrasound medical images with wavelet packets.

Authors:  G Cincotti; G Loi; M Pappalardo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity.

Authors:  Zhou Wang; Alan Conrad Bovik; Hamid Rahim Sheikh; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 10.856

Review 3.  Postprocessing Approaches for the Improvement of Cardiac Ultrasound B-Mode Images: A Review.

Authors:  Antonios Perperidis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Imaging artifacts of medical instruments in ultrasound-guided interventions.

Authors:  Jinlan Huang; John K Triedman; Nikolay V Vasilyev; Yoshihiro Suematsu; Robin O Cleveland; Pierre E Dupont
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Nonlocal means-based speckle filtering for ultrasound images.

Authors:  Pierrick Coupé; Pierre Hellier; Charles Kervrann; Christian Barillot
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 10.856

6.  Varying ultrasound power level to distinguish surgical instruments and tissue.

Authors:  Hongliang Ren; Banani Anuraj; Pierre E Dupont
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  High dynamic range processing for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Andy H Hung; Taiyang Liang; Preeti A Sukerkar; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Gaussian process regression for ultrasound scanline interpolation.

Authors:  Alperen Degirmenci; Robert D Howe; Douglas P Perrin
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-05-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.