Literature DB >> 35603259

Gaussian process regression for ultrasound scanline interpolation.

Alperen Degirmenci1, Robert D Howe1, Douglas P Perrin2,3.   

Abstract

Purpose: In ultrasound imaging, interpolation is a key step in converting scanline data to brightness-mode (B-mode) images. Conventional methods, such as bilinear interpolation, do not fully capture the spatial dependence between data points, which leads to deviations from the underlying probability distribution at the interpolation points. Approach: We propose Gaussian process ( GP ) regression as an improved method for ultrasound scanline interpolation. Using ultrasound scanlines acquired from two different ultrasound scanners during in vivo trials, we compare the scanline conversion accuracy of three standard interpolation methods with that of GP regression, measuring the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and mean absolute error (MAE) for each method.
Results: The PSNR and MAE scores show that GP regression leads to more accurate scanline conversion compared to the nearest neighbor, bilinear, and cubic spline interpolation methods, for both datasets. Furthermore, limiting the interpolation window size of GP regression to 15 reduces computation time with minimal to no reduction in PSNR. Conclusions: GP regression quantitatively leads to more accurate scanline conversion and provides uncertainty estimates at each of the interpolation points. Our windowing method reduces the computational cost of using GP regression for scanline conversion.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gaussian process; interpolation; machine learning; ultrasound

Year:  2022        PMID: 35603259      PMCID: PMC9110552          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.9.3.037001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  11 in total

Review 1.  Freehand 3D ultrasound reconstruction algorithms--a review.

Authors:  Ole Vegard Solberg; Frank Lindseth; Hans Torp; Richard E Blake; Toril A Nagelhus Hernes
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion.

Authors:  Yongjian Yu; Scott T Acton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 10.856

3.  Nonlocal means-based speckle filtering for ultrasound images.

Authors:  Pierrick Coupé; Pierre Hellier; Charles Kervrann; Christian Barillot
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 10.856

4.  Gaussian process interpolation for uncertainty estimation in image registration.

Authors:  Christian Wachinger; Polina Golland; Martin Reuter; William Wells
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2014

5.  Ultrasound confidence maps using random walks.

Authors:  Athanasios Karamalis; Wolfgang Wein; Tassilo Klein; Nassir Navab
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Adaptive Ultrasound Beamforming Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Ben Luijten; Regev Cohen; Frederik J de Bruijn; Harold A W Schmeitz; Massimo Mischi; Yonina C Eldar; Ruud J G van Sloun
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  High dynamic range ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Alperen Degirmenci; Douglas P Perrin; Robert D Howe
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Using kriging for 3D medical imaging.

Authors:  M R Stytz; R W Parrott
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.790

9.  Deep Neural Networks for Ultrasound Beamforming.

Authors:  Adam C Luchies; Brett C Byram
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  CohereNet: A Deep Learning Architecture for Ultrasound Spatial Correlation Estimation and Coherence-Based Beamforming.

Authors:  Alycen Wiacek; Eduardo Gonzalez; Muyinatu A Lediju Bell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.