Literature DB >> 2954811

Which potent opioid? Important criteria for selection.

J G Bovill.   

Abstract

Opioids remain the drugs of choice for the treatment of severe pain. In recent years several new potent opioids have become available for clinical use. These newer drugs are generally safer than the older morphine-like compounds and their differing pharmacological and pharmacokinetic properties allow the physician to choose an appropriate drug according to the clinical situation and need of an individual patient. These drugs are classified according to their activity at the opioid receptors. The opioid agonists produce their pharmacological effect by an almost exclusive action at mu-receptors. The agonist-antagonist group are kappa-receptor agonists and either competitive antagonists at the mu-receptor or weak mu-agonists. The use of the potent opioid agonists, because of their potential for causing respiratory depression, is restricted to hospitals. Fentanyl, the oldest drug of this class, is extensively used as a supplement to general anaesthesia, or in high doses as a 'complete' anaesthetic for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Alfentanil and sufentanil are newer fentanyl derivatives. Alfentanil is unique in having a very short elimination half-life. This is a particular advantage during short operations and for day-case surgery. For longer operations alfentanil can be given as a continuous infusion to supplement nitrous oxide anaesthesia. Sufentanil is about 10 times more potent than fentanyl and is more rapidly eliminated. Initial reports suggest that it may be more effective than fentanyl as an anaesthetic supplement and that recovery may be more rapid. Both sufentanil and alfentanil are also used in cardiac anaesthesia. The newer agonist-antagonist opioids, butorphanol, nalbuphine and buprenorphine, have largely replaced pentazocine in clinical practice. Unlike pentazocine, they cause a low incidence of dysphoric side effects. Like the pure agonists, they cause respiratory depression; however, in contrast to the pure agonists this is not dose related, reaching a 'ceiling' as dose increases. The risk of dependence is also less, so that these drugs are safer for the treatment of chronic pain. Additionally, it is particularly worth noting that buprenorphine and nalbuphine cause minimal cardiovascular changes, and are safe and effective drugs for treatment of pain associated with myocardial infarction. Buprenorphine, which is effective parenterally, orally and sublingually, has a prolonged duration of action (up to 12 hours after a single dose).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2954811     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-198733050-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  25 in total

Review 1.  Comparative study of cardiovascular, neurological and metabolic side effects of 8 narcotics in dogs. Pethidine, piritramide, morphine, phenoperidine, fentanyl, R 39 209, sufentanil, R 34 995. I. Comparative study on the acute toxicity and hemodynamic effects of the narcotics in high and massive doses in curarised and mechanically ventilated dogs.

Authors:  J de Castro; A Van de Water; L Wouters; R Xhonneux; R Reneman; B Kay
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Belg       Date:  1979-03

2.  Pharmacokinetics of high-dose fentanyl. A study in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Authors:  J G Bovill; P S Sebel
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Clinical actions of fentanyl and buprenorphine. The significance of receptor binding.

Authors:  R A Boas; J W Villiger
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  ED50 of alfentanil for induction of anesthesia in unpremedicated young adults.

Authors:  T E McDonnell; R R Bartkowski; J J Williams
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Alfentanil-supplemented anaesthesia for short procedures. A double-blind comparison with fentanyl.

Authors:  M Patrick; B M Eagar; D F Toft; P S Sebel
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Patient administration of I.V. buprenorphine for postoperative pain relief using the "Cardiff" demand analgesia apparatus.

Authors:  J M Gibbs; H D Johnson; F M Davis
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Anaesthetic induction with alfentanil: comparison with thiopental, midazolam, and etomidate.

Authors:  J Nauta; T H Stanley; S de Lange; D Koopman; J Spierdijk; J van Kleef
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1983-01

8.  A double-blind comparison between fentanyl and buprenorphrine in analgesic-supplemented anaesthesia.

Authors:  B Kay
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Reversal of fentanyl related respiratory depression with nalbuphine. Effects on the CO2-response curve in man.

Authors:  E Freye; L Azevedo; E Hartung
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Belg       Date:  1985-12

10.  EEG quantitation of narcotic effect: the comparative pharmacodynamics of fentanyl and alfentanil.

Authors:  J C Scott; K V Ponganis; D R Stanski
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  12 in total

1.  Hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation performed with video and direct laryngoscopy in patients scheduled for major cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Gamze Sarkılar; Mehmet Sargın; Tuba Berra Sarıtaş; Hale Borazan; Funda Gök; Alper Kılıçaslan; Şeref Otelcioğlu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

2.  Withdrawal symptom after discontinuation of transdermal fentanyl at a daily dose of 0.6 mg.

Authors:  Chie Ishihara; Hiroki Konishi; Mikio Chiba; Tokuzo Minouchi; Yoshihiro Endo; Akira Yamaji
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2005-02

Review 3.  Pharmacotherapy of opioids: present and future developments.

Authors:  T F Meert
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1996-01

Review 4.  Transdermal fentanyl. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in pain control.

Authors:  W Jeal; P Benfield
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Fentanyl sublingual: in breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant adults with cancer.

Authors:  Claudine M Chwieduk; Kate McKeage
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Drug interactions of clinical significance with opioid analgesics.

Authors:  P M Maurer; R R Bartkowski
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  [Analgesia with opioids in the paediatric patient.].

Authors:  C Schlünder
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 8.  Benefit-risk assessment of transdermal fentanyl for the treatment of chronic pain.

Authors:  Craig A Kornick; Juan Santiago-Palma; Natalia Moryl; Richard Payne; Eugenie A M T Obbens
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Excessive morphine requirements after pre-hospital nalbuphine analgesia.

Authors:  K P Houlihan; R G Mitchell; A D Flapan; D J Steedman
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-01

10.  Comparison of nalbuphine and fentanyl as intravenous analgesics for medically compromised patients undergoing oral surgery.

Authors:  B Lefèvre; M Freysz; J Lèpine; J M Royer; D Perrin; G Malka
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1992
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.