Literature DB >> 26379966

Hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation performed with video and direct laryngoscopy in patients scheduled for major cardiac surgery.

Gamze Sarkılar1, Mehmet Sargın2, Tuba Berra Sarıtaş1, Hale Borazan1, Funda Gök1, Alper Kılıçaslan1, Şeref Otelcioğlu1.   

Abstract

This study aims to compare the hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation performed with direct and video laryngoscope in patients scheduled for cardiac surgery and to assess the airway and laryngoscopic characteristics. One hundred ten patients were equally allocated to either direct Macintosh laryngoscope (n = 55) or indirect Macintosh C-MAC video laryngoscope (n = 55). Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure, and heart rate were recorded prior to induction anesthesia, and immediately and two minutes after intubation. Airway characteristics (modified Mallampati, thyromental distance, sternomental distance, mouth opening, upper lip bite test, Wilson risk sum score), mask ventilation, laryngoscopic characteristics (Cormack-Lehane, percentage of glottic opening), intubation time, number of attempts, external pressure application, use of stylet and predictors of difficult intubation (modified Mallampati grade 3-4, thyromental distance < 6 cm, upper lip bite test class 3, Wilson risk sum score ≥ 2, Cormack-Lehane grade 3-4) were recorded. Hemodynamic parameters were similar between the groups at all time points of measurement. Airway characteristics and mask ventilation were no significant between the groups. The C-MAC video laryngoscope group had better laryngoscopic view as assessed by Cormack-Lehane and percentage of glottic view, and a longer intubation time. Number of attempts, external pressure, use of stylet, and difficult intubation parameters were similar. Endotracheal intubation performed with direct Macintosh laryngoscope or indirect Macintosh C-MAC video laryngoscope causes similar and stable hemodynamic responses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Macintosh C-MAC video laryngoscope; cardiac surgery; endotracheal intubation; hemodynamic response

Year:  2015        PMID: 26379966      PMCID: PMC4565349     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  24 in total

1.  Cardiovascular effects of forces applied during laryngoscopy. The importance of tracheal intubation.

Authors:  M J Bucx; R T van Geel; P A Scheck; T Stijnen
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Randomized controlled trial comparing the McGrath videolaryngoscope with the C-MAC videolaryngoscope in intubating adult patients with potential difficult airways.

Authors:  I Ng; A L Hill; D L Williams; K Lee; R Segal
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  The C-MAC videolaryngoscope: first experiences with a new device for videolaryngoscopy-guided intubation.

Authors:  Erol Cavus; Joerg Kieckhaefer; Volker Doerges; Thora Moeller; Carsten Thee; Klaus Wagner
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 4.  Myocardial ischemia revisited.

Authors:  Stephen Slogoff; Arthur S Keats
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Performance of the C-MAC video laryngoscope in patients after a limited glottic view using Macintosh laryngoscopy.

Authors:  T Piepho; K Fortmueller; F M Heid; I Schmidtmann; C Werner; R R Noppens
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  Circulatory changes during direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: influence of duration of laryngoscopy with or without prior lidocaine.

Authors:  R K Stoelting
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics.

Authors:  R S Cormack; J Lehane
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Does perioperative myocardial ischemia lead to postoperative myocardial infarction?

Authors:  S Slogoff; A S Keats
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.

Authors:  André van Zundert; Ralph Maassen; Ruben Lee; Remi Willems; Michel Timmerman; Marc Siemonsma; Marc Buise; Marco Wiepking
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Haemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation in coronary artery disease: Direct versus video laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Muralidhar Kanchi; Hema C Nair; Sanjay Banakal; Keshava Murthy; C Murugesan
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2011-05
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Jan Hansel; Andrew M Rogers; Sharon R Lewis; Tim M Cook; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-04

2.  Randomized controlled study comparing the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with McCoy, Macintosh, and C-MAC laryngoscopes in adult patients.

Authors:  Faiza Sulaiman Buhari; Venkatesh Selvaraj
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

Review 3.  Current evidence for the use of C-MAC videolaryngoscope in adult airway management: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Fu-Shan Xue; Hui-Xian Li; Ya-Yang Liu; Gui-Zhen Yang
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.423

4.  Hemodynamic Response to Orotracheal Intubation: Comparison between Macintosh, McCoy, and C-MAC Video Laryngoscope.

Authors:  Hiteshi Aggarwal; Sarvjeet Kaur; Naresh Baghla; Satinderjit Kaur
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

Review 5.  Video screen visualization patterns when using a video laryngoscope for tracheal intubation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Preston Dean; Benjamin Kerrey
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-01-06

6.  Comparison Between McCoy Laryngoscope and C-MAC Video Laryngoscope in Anticipated Difficult Airway: A Prospective Randomised Study.

Authors:  Mukul Garg; Raju Shakya; Nari Mary Lyngdoh; Debasis Pradhan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-09

7.  Suitability of Nasotracheal Intubation using King Vision and TruviewPCD Video Laryngoscopes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Gayatri Mishra; Varghese Mammen Philip; Vadlamudi Reddy Hemanth Kumar; Thiyagarajan Sivashanmugam
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

8.  Comparative evaluation of hemodynamic responses and ease of intubation with airtraq video laryngoscope versus macintosh laryngoscope in patients with ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  A V Varsha; Gladdy George; Rahul Pillai; Raj Sahajanandan
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec

9.  Utility of a Modified Oropharyngeal Airway for Performing Tracheal Intubation Using a Fiberoptic Bronchoscope and Video Stylet: A Randomized Crossover Trial Using a Manikin.

Authors:  Jang Hee Lee; Ji Ung Na; Dong Hyuk Shin; Pil Cho Choi; Sang O Park; Won Jae Kim; Sang Kuk Han
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 1.112

Review 10.  Comparisons of Videolaryngoscopes for Intubation Undergoing General Anesthesia: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Juncheol Lee; Youngsuk Cho; Wonhee Kim; Kyu-Sun Choi; Bo-Hyoung Jang; Hyungoo Shin; Chiwon Ahn; Jae Guk Kim; Min Kyun Na; Tae Ho Lim; Dong Won Kim
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.