Literature DB >> 2954594

Impact of genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome and neural tube defects.

A Swerts.   

Abstract

In two parallel studies the impact of genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis upon family planning decisions was evaluated for parents of a child with Down syndrome and for parents of a child with neural tube defect. One hundred and nineteen parents of a child with standard trisomy 21 volunteered to participate in study I; 94 parents who had a neural tube defect child took part in study II. Each study included three groups of parents: one group received genetic counseling, another group had already an amniocentesis performed and a third group of parents had neither received genetic counseling nor had they an amniocentesis performed. Data collection took place by means of interviews by a social nurse at the parents' home. An exhaustive questionnaire was used to guide the interview and to assess the total impact of the birth of the affected child as completely as possible. Some years later additional follow-up information was gathered by sending a questionnaire to all families. In both studies a significantly better recall of the relevant risk figures was found in the counseled group as compared with the group of parents who did not receive genetic counseling. The relationship between the recalled risk and its subjective interpretation was very complex. The information given during the counseling session(s) influenced more than half of the parents of a child with Down syndrome, to decide in favour of further pregnancies. In the group of parents having a child with neural tube defect the information received at the genetic counseling session(s) even had a more important effect: 80 percent decided to plan another pregnancy. Results of both studies clearly indicate that for more than half of the families the availability of prenatal diagnosis was of crucial importance in the decision to plan future pregnancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2954594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser        ISSN: 0547-6844


  7 in total

1.  Improving communication between doctors and parents after newborn screening.

Authors:  Michael H Farrell; Stephanie A Christopher; Audrey Tluczek; Karen Kennedy-Parker; Alison La Pean; Kerry Eskra; Jenelle Collins; Gary Hoffman; Julie Panepinto; Philip M Farrell
Journal:  WMJ       Date:  2011-10

Review 2.  How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Glyn Elwyn; Clara L Gaff; Angus J Clarke; Rachel Iredale; Chris Shaw; Joanna Dundon; Hazel Thornton; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Toward a new conceptualization and operationalization of risk perception within the genetic counseling domain.

Authors:  C G Palmer; F Sainfort
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Attitudes toward the prenatal diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: factors in decision making among affected families.

Authors:  D C Wertz; S R Janes; J M Rosenfield; R W Erbe
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Attitudes toward abortion among parents of children with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  D C Wertz; J M Rosenfield; S R Janes; R W Erbe
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Frequency of high-quality communication behaviors used by primary care providers of heterozygous infants after newborn screening.

Authors:  Michael H Farrell; Stephanie A Christopher
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-11-26

7.  Prenatal screening for hemoglobinopathies. III. Applicability of the health belief model.

Authors:  P T Rowley; S Loader; C J Sutera; M Walden; A Kozyra
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 11.025

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.