Literature DB >> 29542015

Prediction of cardiac death after adenosine myocardial perfusion SPECT based on machine learning.

David Haro Alonso1, Miles N Wernick2, Yongyi Yang1, Guido Germano3, Daniel S Berman3, Piotr Slomka3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We developed machine-learning (ML) models to estimate a patient's risk of cardiac death based on adenosine myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) and associated clinical data, and compared their performance to baseline logistic regression (LR). We demonstrated an approach to visually convey the reasoning behind a patient's risk to provide insight to clinicians beyond that of a "black box."
METHODS: We trained multiple models using 122 potential clinical predictors (features) for 8321 patients, including 551 cases of subsequent cardiac death. Accuracy was measured by area under the ROC curve (AUC), computed within a cross-validation framework. We developed a method to display the model's rationale to facilitate clinical interpretation.
RESULTS: The baseline LR (AUC = 0.76; 14 features) was outperformed by all other methods. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) model (AUC = 0.77; p = .045; 6 features) required the fewest features. A support vector machine (SVM) model (AUC = 0.83; p < .0001; 49 features) provided the highest accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: LASSO outperformed LR in both accuracy and simplicity (number of features), with SVM yielding best AUC for prediction of cardiac death in patients undergoing MPS. Combined with presenting the reasoning behind the risk scores, our results suggest that ML can be more effective than LR for this application.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac death; data visualization; feature selection; machine learning; risk model

Year:  2018        PMID: 29542015      PMCID: PMC6138585          DOI: 10.1007/s12350-018-1250-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  17 in total

1.  Cardiac event risk in Japanese subjects estimated using gated myocardial perfusion imaging, in conjunction with diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Kenichi Nakajima; Shinro Matsuo; Chio Okuyama; Tsuguru Hatta; Kazumasa Tsukamoto; Shigeyuki Nishimura; Akira Yamashina; Hideo Kusuoka; Tsunehiko Nishimura
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 2.993

2.  ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging).

Authors:  Francis J Klocke; Michael G Baird; Beverly H Lorell; Timothy M Bateman; Joseph V Messer; Daniel S Berman; Patrick T O'Gara; Blase A Carabello; Richard O Russell; Manuel D Cerqueira; Martin G St John Sutton; Anthony N DeMaria; James E Udelson; J Ward Kennedy; Mario S Verani; Kim Allan Williams; Elliott M Antman; Sidney C Smith; Joseph S Alpert; Gabriel Gregoratos; Jeffrey L Anderson; Loren F Hiratzka; David P Faxon; Sharon Ann Hunt; Valentin Fuster; Alice K Jacobs; Raymond J Gibbons; Richard O Russell
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Machine Learning in Medical Imaging.

Authors:  Miles N Wernick; Yongyi Yang; Jovan G Brankov; Grigori Yourganov; Stephen C Strother
Journal:  IEEE Signal Process Mag       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 12.551

5.  Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; L J Shaw; H Kiat; I Cohen; J A Cabico; J Friedman; G A Diamond
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Incremental prognostic value of adenosine stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography and impact on subsequent management in patients with or suspected of having myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; H Kiat; I Cohen; H Lewin; A Amanullah; X Kang; J Friedman; G A Diamond
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Independent prognostic value of intravenous dipyridamole with technetium-99m sestamibi tomographic imaging in predicting cardiac events and cardiac-related hospital admissions.

Authors:  G V Heller; S D Herman; M I Travin; J I Baron; C Santos-Ocampo; J R McClellan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography is clinically effective and cost effective in risk stratification of patients with a high likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) but no known CAD.

Authors:  Rory Hachamovitch; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Ishac Cohen; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Rory Hachamovitch; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Ishac Cohen; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Separate acquisition rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography: a clinical validation study.

Authors:  D S Berman; H Kiat; J D Friedman; F P Wang; K van Train; L Matzer; J Maddahi; G Germano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Karthik Seetharam; James K Min
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec

2.  The machine learning approach: Artificial intelligence is coming to support critical clinical thinking.

Authors:  Carmela Nappi; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Machine learning for nuclear cardiology: The way forward.

Authors:  Sirish Shrestha; Partho P Sengupta
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine.

Authors:  Karthik Seetharam; Sirish Shrestha; Partho P Sengupta
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-05-14

Review 5.  Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging for Risk Stratification in Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Andrew Lin; Márton Kolossváry; Manish Motwani; Ivana Išgum; Pál Maurovich-Horvat; Piotr J Slomka; Damini Dey
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2021-02-25

6.  "Global" cardiac atherosclerotic burden assessed by artificial intelligence-based versus manual segmentation in 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT scans: Head-to-head comparison.

Authors:  Reza Piri; Lars Edenbrandt; Måns Larsson; Olof Enqvist; Sofie Skovrup; Kasper Karmark Iversen; Babak Saboury; Abass Alavi; Oke Gerke; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.872

7.  Handling missing values in machine learning to predict patient-specific risk of adverse cardiac events: Insights from REFINE SPECT registry.

Authors:  Richard Rios; Robert J H Miller; Nipun Manral; Tali Sharir; Andrew J Einstein; Mathews B Fish; Terrence D Ruddy; Philipp A Kaufmann; Albert J Sinusas; Edward J Miller; Timothy M Bateman; Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo Di Carli; Serge D Van Kriekinge; Paul B Kavanagh; Tejas Parekh; Joanna X Liang; Damini Dey; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 6.698

Review 8.  Artificial intelligence in single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging: a narrative review.

Authors:  Wenyi Shao; Steven P Rowe; Yong Du
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-05

Review 9.  Artificial intelligence and echocardiography.

Authors:  M Alsharqi; W J Woodward; J A Mumith; D C Markham; R Upton; P Leeson
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2018-12-01

10.  Determining a minimum set of variables for machine learning cardiovascular event prediction: results from REFINE SPECT registry.

Authors:  Richard Rios; Robert J H Miller; Lien Hsin Hu; Yuka Otaki; Ananya Singh; Marcio Diniz; Tali Sharir; Andrew J Einstein; Mathews B Fish; Terrence D Ruddy; Philipp A Kaufmann; Albert J Sinusas; Edward J Miller; Timothy M Bateman; Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo DiCarli; Serge Van Kriekinge; Paul Kavanagh; Tejas Parekh; Joanna X Liang; Damini Dey; Daniel S Berman; Piotr Slomka
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 13.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.