Karthik Seetharam1, Sirish Shrestha1, Partho P Sengupta2. 1. WVU Heart & Vascular Institute, 1 Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA. 2. WVU Heart & Vascular Institute, 1 Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA. Partho.Sengupta@wvumedicine.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The ripples of artificial intelligence are being felt in various sectors of human life. Machine learning, a subset of artificial intelligence, extracts information from large databases of information and is gaining traction in various fields of cardiology. In this review, we highlight noteworthy examples of machine learning utilization in echocardiography, nuclear cardiology, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging over the past year. RECENT FINDINGS: In the past year, machine learning (ML) has expanded its boundaries in cardiology with several positive results. Some studies have integrated clinical and imaging information to further augment the accuracy of these ML algorithms. All the studies mentioned in this review have clearly demonstrated superior results of ML in relation to conventional approaches for identifying obstructions or predicting major adverse events in reference to conventional approaches. As the influx of data arriving from gradually evolving technologies in health care and wearable devices continues to be more complex, ML may serve as the bridge to transcend the gap between health care and patients in the future. In order to facilitate a seamless transition between both, a few issues must be resolved for a successful implementation of ML in health care.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The ripples of artificial intelligence are being felt in various sectors of human life. Machine learning, a subset of artificial intelligence, extracts information from large databases of information and is gaining traction in various fields of cardiology. In this review, we highlight noteworthy examples of machine learning utilization in echocardiography, nuclear cardiology, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging over the past year. RECENT FINDINGS: In the past year, machine learning (ML) has expanded its boundaries in cardiology with several positive results. Some studies have integrated clinical and imaging information to further augment the accuracy of these ML algorithms. All the studies mentioned in this review have clearly demonstrated superior results of ML in relation to conventional approaches for identifying obstructions or predicting major adverse events in reference to conventional approaches. As the influx of data arriving from gradually evolving technologies in health care and wearable devices continues to be more complex, ML may serve as the bridge to transcend the gap between health care and patients in the future. In order to facilitate a seamless transition between both, a few issues must be resolved for a successful implementation of ML in health care.
Entities:
Keywords:
Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine; Machine learning; State-of-the-art informatics
Authors: Li Kuo Tan; Robert A McLaughlin; Einly Lim; Yang Faridah Abdul Aziz; Yih Miin Liew Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2018-01-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Salim S Virani; Clifton W Callaway; Alanna M Chamberlain; Alexander R Chang; Susan Cheng; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Francesca N Delling; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; Jane F Ferguson; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Pamela L Lutsey; Jason S Mackey; David B Matchar; Kunihiro Matsushita; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Martin O'Flaherty; Latha P Palaniappan; Ambarish Pandey; Dilip K Pandey; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew D Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Gary M Satou; Svati H Shah; Nicole L Spartano; David L Tirschwell; Connie W Tsao; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mahdi Tabassian; Imran Sunderji; Tamas Erdei; Sergio Sanchez-Martinez; Anna Degiovanni; Paolo Marino; Alan G Fraser; Jan D'hooge Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2018-08-23 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Matteo Maspero; Mark H F Savenije; Anna M Dinkla; Peter R Seevinck; Martijn P W Intven; Ina M Jurgenliemk-Schulz; Linda G W Kerkmeijer; Cornelis A T van den Berg Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Timothy S C Hinks; Xiaoying Zhou; Karl J Staples; Borislav D Dimitrov; Alexander Manta; Tanya Petrossian; Pek Y Lum; Caroline G Smith; Jon A Ward; Peter H Howarth; Andrew F Walls; Stephan D Gadola; Ratko Djukanović Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Jessica L Nielson; Jesse Paquette; Aiwen W Liu; Cristian F Guandique; C Amy Tovar; Tomoo Inoue; Karen-Amanda Irvine; John C Gensel; Jennifer Kloke; Tanya C Petrossian; Pek Y Lum; Gunnar E Carlsson; Geoffrey T Manley; Wise Young; Michael S Beattie; Jacqueline C Bresnahan; Adam R Ferguson Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: P Y Lum; G Singh; A Lehman; T Ishkanov; M Vejdemo-Johansson; M Alagappan; J Carlsson; G Carlsson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Bum-Joo Cho; Youn Jin Choi; Myung-Je Lee; Ju Han Kim; Ga-Hyun Son; Sung-Ho Park; Hong-Bae Kim; Yeon-Ji Joo; Hye-Yon Cho; Min Sun Kyung; Young-Han Park; Byung Soo Kang; Soo Young Hur; Sanha Lee; Sung Taek Park Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 4.379