Literature DB >> 29541665

Heavy metals analysis and quality assessment in drinking water - Khorramabad city, Iran.

Mansour Ghaderpoori1,2, Bahram Kamarehie1, Ali Jafari1,2, Afshin Ghaderpoury3, Mohammadamin Karami1.   

Abstract

Continuous monitoring of drinking water quality is essential in terms of heavy metals and toxic substances. The general objective of this study were to determine the concentration of heavy metals in drinking water of Khorramabad city and to determine the water quality indices (The heavy metal pollution index and heavy metal evaluation index). According to the city map, 45 points were selected for drinking water sampling through the city distribution system. The results of this study showed that the average concentration of heavy metals such as Zn, Pb, Cd, Cr, and Cu were 47.01 μg/l, 3.2 μg/l, 0.42 μg/l, 5.08 μg/l, and 6.79 μg/l, respectively. The HPI and HEI (water quality indices) for Zn, Pb, Cd, Cr, and Cu were 46.58, 46.58, respectively. According to the indices, the city drinking water quality is good in terms of heavy metals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drinking water quality; Heavy metals; Khorramabad city; Monitoring

Year:  2017        PMID: 29541665      PMCID: PMC5847489          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.11.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table Value of the Data There is always the possibility of contamination of water resources with heavy metals and toxic substances, therefore, continuous monitoring is essential. Heavy metals can accumulate in human body and other living organisms over a long period and may cause adverse effects on human health. The main sources of heavy metals contamination in drinking water including heavy metals leakage through iron pipes in distribution systems and due to geological contamination of the region that water originates from. One of the most important methods for drinking water quality determination is the measurement of heavy metal pollution by indices, so, heavy metals data can be used for determination of the water quality indices determination.

Location data

Khorramabad, one of the cities of Lorestan province, located at west of Iran (33° 48′ N, 48° 35′ E). Fig. 1 shows the location of the city and the sampling points the study area. The city area is about 6233 km2. Based on the latest population census in Iran (2016), its population was 506,471 persons.
Fig. 1

Location and sampling points in Khorramabad city, Iran.

Location and sampling points in Khorramabad city, Iran.

Experimental design, materials, and methods

In this study, 45 stations were selected as sampling points in a way that covers the whole city distribution system. Sampling was performed according to a standards procedure. The collected samples were also kept in accordance with standard methods for water and wastewater. Further, ICP-OES (Instrument Model: Varian VISTA-MPX) was used to measure the concentrations of heavy metals. Table 1 shows the concentration of measured heavy metals.
Table 1

The concentrations of heavy metals in the study area.

Station1234567891011121314151617181920212223
Zn33.4043.3056.2144.5078.9043.46103.6159.2956.9493.1164.5879.2745.5754.4854.4898.2761.5430.018.327.418.7228.2513.35
Pb0.671.020.580.591.323.064.743.641.354.545.952.836.570.350.352.292.593.436.386.004.498.273.50
Cd0.050.050.020.130.120.140.110.130.080.420.040.130.130.100.620.941.491.440.850.520.73
Cr3.048.1410.397.137.623.394.754.874.796.957.876.394.317.577.577.806.390.393.422.865.322.030.60
Cu0.170.103.150.360.4410.8711.485.616.0139.313.596.019.445.395.399.352.593.364.065.263.453.303.26
Station24252627282930313233343536373839404142434445
Zn70.8887.1194.23104.7769.0469.0481.4011.589.889.8112.8012.8821.8018.8519.3117.5020.2846.41754.71251.10337.6527.221
Pb1.004.874.335.014.414.410.734.393.506.392.942.833.093.081.651.193.112.112.051.933.532.73
Cd0.150.100.220.140.560.560.441.000.920.640.660.750.800.350.360.690.3280.6080.1540.560.122
Cr5.018.196.176.695.825.821.864.420.643.235.543.5510.765.623.713.505.683.351.241.167.635.32
Cu16.3217.6221.3621.379.159.1515.043.884.043.434.213.223.704.223.223.233.213.183.443.353.263.84
The concentrations of heavy metals in the study area. After determining the concentration, water quality pollution indices were calculated. The heavy metal pollution index (HPI) indicates the overall quality of the drinking water in terms of heavy metals [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. This index is calculated according to Eqs. (1), (2) as follows:where, Qi and Wi are the sub-index of the ith parameter and the unit weightage of the ith parameter, respectively. n is the number of parameters considered. Mi, Ii, and Si are the monitored values of heavy metal, ideal and standard values of the ith parameter, respectively. The sign (−) indicates the numerical differences of the two values, ignoring the algebraic sign. Water quality based on HPI can be classified into three categories including: low (less than 100), the threshold risk (equal to 100), and high (more than 100). If HPI is more than 100, water cannot be used for drinking. Measured values of HPI index for the drinking water samples are presented in Table 2. Heavy metal evaluation index (HEI) is a method of estimating the water quality with focus on heavy metals in drinking water [4], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. This index is calculated according to Eq. (3), as follows:where, Hc and Hmac are the monitored values and maximum admissible concentration of the ith parameter, respectively. The classifications of the HEI index is as follows: low (less than 10), medium (between 10 and 20), and high (more than 20). Table 2, Table 3 show the used constants and the values of the calculated HPI and HEI, respectively [11], [12], [13], [14].
Table 2

Applied parameters and constants for calculation of HPI and HPI (according to WHO guidelines).

MetalMCL* (µg/l)WiIiSiHmax
As500.02105050
Zn50000.0002300050005000
Pb1.50.7101001.5
Cd30.3353
Cr500.0250150
Cu10000.001200010001000
Mn500.0250010050
Table 3

The calculated indices, HPI and HEI, at the sampling points for heavy metals.

StationZnPbCdCrCuCdQi-ZnQi-PbQi-CdQi-CrQi-CuQi-MnΣWi*QiHPIHPI classificationHEIHEI classification
133.40.670.0463.040.17−5.52148.3310.37147.7095.84199.98125.0056.7153.44238Low heavy metals0.52965Low heavy metals
243.31.020.0468.140.1−3.58147.849.98147.7085.43199.99125.0056.2352.98961Low heavy metals0.866893Low heavy metals
356.210.580.02310.393.15−3.13147.1910.47148.8580.84199.69125.0056.8353.55025Low heavy metals0.616525Low heavy metals
444.50.5907.130.36−4.22147.7810.46150.0087.49199.96125.0057.3053.99378Low heavy metals0.545193Low heavy metals
578.91.320.0017.620.44−3.56146.069.64149.9586.49199.96125.0056.7053.42544Low heavy metals1.048953Low heavy metals
643.463.060.1273.3910.87−3.77147.837.71143.6595.12198.91125.0053.6250.5312Low heavy metals2.169695Low heavy metals
7103.614.740.1244.7511.48−2.18144.825.84143.8092.35198.85125.0052.3149.28936Low heavy metals3.328535Low heavy metals
859.293.640.1374.875.61−2.89147.047.07143.1592.10199.44125.0052.9649.90817Low heavy metals2.587201Low heavy metals
956.941.350.1094.796.01−4.45147.159.61144.5592.27199.40125.0055.1751.98541Low heavy metals1.049531Low heavy metals
1093.114.540.1276.9539.31−1.56145.346.07143.6587.86196.07125.0052.3249.3064Low heavy metals3.265932Low heavy metals
1164.585.950.0847.873.59−0.37146.774.50145.8085.98199.64125.0051.8448.84903Low heavy metals4.168573Low heavy metals
1279.272.830.4236.396.01−2.82146.047.97128.8589.00199.40125.0049.2446.40056Low heavy metals2.177331Low heavy metals
1345.576.570.0424.319.44−1.15147.723.81147.9093.24199.06125.0052.1349.12484Low heavy metals4.498754Low heavy metals
1454.480.350.1337.575.39−4.18147.2810.72143.3586.59199.46125.0055.4752.27225Low heavy metals0.445353Low heavy metals
1554.480.350.1337.575.39−4.18147.2810.72143.3586.59199.46125.0055.4752.27225Low heavy metals0.445353Low heavy metals
1698.272.290.1017.89.35−2.81145.098.57144.9586.12199.07125.0054.4351.29306Low heavy metals1.745337Low heavy metals
1761.542.590.6166.392.59−2.92146.928.23119.2089.00199.74125.0046.5343.84891Low heavy metals2.074698Low heavy metals
1830.0143.430.9420.393.36−4.26148.507.30102.90101.24199.66125.0041.2338.85626Low heavy metals2.617829Low heavy metals
198.3156.381.4863.424.06−1.11149.584.0275.7095.06199.59125.0030.6628.88833Low heavy metals4.82279Low heavy metals
207.40861.4432.865.26−1.56149.634.4477.8596.20199.47125.0031.6229.79607Low heavy metals4.544942Low heavy metals
218.7174.490.8475.323.45−1.95149.566.12107.6591.18199.66125.0041.6339.23275Low heavy metals3.38726Low heavy metals
2228.2538.270.5212.033.3−0.63148.591.92123.9597.90199.67125.0043.7241.19667Low heavy metals5.736551Low heavy metals
2313.3543.50.7260.63.26−4.22149.337.22113.70100.82199.67125.0044.4141.85019Low heavy metals2.593264Low heavy metals
2470.8810.1475.0116.32−4.58146.4610.00142.6591.82198.37125.0054.8651.69524Low heavy metals0.846363Low heavy metals
2587.114.870.1048.1917.62−0.95145.645.70144.8085.33198.24125.0052.3649.34404Low heavy metals3.480175Low heavy metals
2694.234.330.2196.1721.36−1.94145.296.30139.0589.45197.86125.0051.1448.19158Low heavy metals3.123273Low heavy metals
27104.775.010.1426.6921.37−1.34144.765.54142.9088.39197.86125.0051.7548.76148Low heavy metals3.563457Low heavy metals
2869.0434.410.5635.829.15−1.91146.556.21121.8590.16199.09125.0045.9343.28537Low heavy metals3.267025Low heavy metals
2969.0434.410.5635.829.15−1.91146.556.21121.8590.16199.09125.0045.9343.28537Low heavy metals3.267025Low heavy metals
3081.3980.730.4351.8615.04−5.72145.9310.30128.2598.24198.50125.0050.8847.94344Low heavy metals0.700186Low heavy metals
3111.5794.3914.423.88−2.26149.426.23100.0093.02199.61125.0039.4537.17795Low heavy metals3.354596Low heavy metals
329.8823.50.920.644.04−4.14149.517.22104.00100.73199.60125.0041.5039.10643Low heavy metals2.658816Low heavy metals
339.8146.393.233.43−1.66149.514.01150.0095.45199.66125.0052.9549.89287Low heavy metals4.329993Low heavy metals
3412.8042.940.6425.544.21−2.97149.367.84117.9090.73199.58125.0045.9143.25787Low heavy metals2.291571Low heavy metals
3512.8842.830.6553.553.22−3.71149.367.97117.2594.80199.68125.0045.8843.23137Low heavy metals2.181797Low heavy metals
3621.7993.090.74810.763.7−1.10148.917.68112.6080.08199.63125.0043.9941.44882Low heavy metals2.532593Low heavy metals
3718.8463.080.8035.624.22−2.80149.067.69109.8590.57199.58125.0043.3840.8764Low heavy metals2.441389Low heavy metals
3819.3081.650.3463.713.22−4.54149.039.28132.7094.47199.68125.0051.4248.45771Low heavy metals1.296615Low heavy metals
3917.5031.190.3613.53.23−4.91149.129.79131.9594.90199.68125.0051.5648.59092Low heavy metals0.990397Low heavy metals
4020.2753.110.6865.683.21−2.80148.997.66115.7090.45199.68125.0045.1142.50598Low heavy metals2.422865Low heavy metals
4146.4172.110.3283.353.18−4.35147.688.77133.6095.20199.68125.0051.3548.38858Low heavy metals1.595463Low heavy metals
4254.7122.050.6081.243.44−5.00147.268.83119.6099.51199.66125.0047.2844.55583Low heavy metals1.608516Low heavy metals
4351.1031.930.1541.163.35−5.26147.448.97142.3099.67199.67125.0054.1951.06416Low heavy metals1.374771Low heavy metals
4437.653.530.567.633.26−1.91148.127.19122.0086.47199.67125.0046.5943.90398Low heavy metals2.70339Low heavy metals
4527.2212.730.1225.323.84−3.36148.648.08143.9091.18199.62125.0053.8850.77032Low heavy metals1.976351Low heavy metals
Mean47.013.200.425.086.79−3.11147.707.64130.0691.90199.34125.0049.4346.582.33
Applied parameters and constants for calculation of HPI and HPI (according to WHO guidelines). The calculated indices, HPI and HEI, at the sampling points for heavy metals.
Subject areaChemistry, biology
More specific subject areaWater monitoring and quality
Type of dataTable, figure
How data was acquiredICP-OES (Instrument Model: Varian VISTA-MPX)
Data formatRaw, analyzed,
Experimental factorsMeasuring the concentration of heavy metals (Zn, Pb, Cd, Cr, and Cu) in the samples of drinking water distribution system. After determining the concentration, water quality pollution indices were calculated.
Experimental featuresAccording to the city map, 45 points of drinking water in distribution system were selected as sampling point. Until concentration measurement, all samples were stored in standard conditions and were analyzed for heavy metals
Data source locationKhorramabad city Iran (33° 48′ N, 48° 35′ E)., Lorestan province, west of Iran
Data accessibilityData are included in this article and supplemented excel file
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of Surface Water Quality by Using GIS and a Heavy Metal Pollution Index (HPI) Model in a Coal Mining Area, India.

Authors:  Ashwani Kumar Tiwari; Marina De Maio; Prasoon Kumar Singh; Mukesh Kumar Mahato
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.151

  1 in total
  15 in total

1.  Appraising drinking water quality in Ikem rural area (Nigeria) based on chemometrics and multiple indexical methods.

Authors:  Johnbosco C Egbueri; Chimankpam K Ezugwu; Peter D Ameh; Chinanu O Unigwe; Daniel A Ayejoto
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Data on nitrate and nitrate of Taham dam in Zanjan (Iran).

Authors:  Mohammadreza Massoudinejad; Mansour Ghaderpoori; Ali Jafari; Jamal Nasehifar; Alireza Malekzadeh; Afshin Ghaderpoury
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2018-02-02

3.  Health risk assessment of heavy metals on PM2.5 in Tehran air, Iran.

Authors:  Anoushiravan MohseniBandpi; Akbar Eslami; Mansour Ghaderpoori; Abbas Shahsavani; Ali Khani Jeihooni; Afshin Ghaderpoury; Abdolazim Alinejad
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2018-01-31

4.  Data on the fluoride adsorption from aqueous solutions by metal-organic frameworks (ZIF-8 and Uio-66).

Authors:  Bahram Kamarehie; Zahra Noraee; Ali Jafari; Mansour Ghaderpoori; Mohammad Amin Karami; Afshin Ghaderpoury
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2018-08-31

5.  Dataset on the assessment of water quality of surface water in Kalingarayan Canal for heavy metal pollution, Tamil Nadu.

Authors:  T Mohanakavitha; R Divahar; T Meenambal; K Shankar; Vijay Singh Rawat; Tamirat Dessalegn Haile; Chimdi Gadafa
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2019-01-10

6.  Spatial Distribution Variation and Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Exposure to Fluoride in Ground Water Supplies: A Case Study in an Endemic Fluorosis Region of Northwest Iran.

Authors:  Mahmood Yousefi; Farzaneh Baghal Asghari; Pietro Zuccarello; Gea Oliveri Conti; Aida Ejlali; Ali Akbar Mohammadi; Margherita Ferrante
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Health risk assessment of heavy metals in cosmetic products sold in Iran: the Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Mansour Ghaderpoori; Bahram Kamarehie; Ali Jafari; Abdol Azim Alinejad; Yalda Hashempour; Mohammad Hossein Saghi; Mahmood Yousefi; Gea Oliveri Conti; Ali Akbar Mohammadi; Afshin Ghaderpoury; Margherita Ferrante
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 5.190

8.  Data on phosphorous concentration of rivers feeding into Taham dam in Zanjan, Iran.

Authors:  Mohamadreza Masoudinejad; Mansour Ghaderpoori; Ahmad Zarei; Jamal Nasehifar; Alireza Malekzadeh; Jalil Nasiri; Afshin Ghaderpoury
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2018-01-31

9.  Data on physicochemical quality of drinking water in the rural area in Divandarreh county, Kurdistan, Iran.

Authors:  Afshin Maleki; Bahram Kamarehie; Reza Rezaee; Ali Jafari; Yahya Zandsalami; Pegah Bahmani; Esmail Ghahramani; Mohammad Amin Karami
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2018-06-22

10.  Data on the alizarin red S adsorption from aqueous solutions on PAC, treated PAC, and PAC/γ≈Fe2O3.

Authors:  Bahram Kamarehie; Ali Jafari; Mansour Ghaderpoori; Mohammad Amin Karami; Khadijeh Mousavi; Afshin Ghaderpoury
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2018-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.