Literature DB >> 30229041

Data on physicochemical quality of drinking water in the rural area in Divandarreh county, Kurdistan, Iran.

Afshin Maleki1, Bahram Kamarehie2, Reza Rezaee1, Ali Jafari2, Yahya Zandsalami1,3, Pegah Bahmani1,3, Esmail Ghahramani1, Mohammad Amin Karami2.   

Abstract

Good quality of drinking water is very important in the maintenance of human health. The gathered data from the present work was used to evaluate the quality of drinking water resources in the rural villages of Divandarreh, Iran. Physicochemical quality of water was determined by a collection of 35 random samples during dry and rainy seasons in 2015. The APHA approach was used to determine the physicochemical parameters of the samples. The results showed that the average concentration of Ca, Mg, Na, K, Cl, SO4, TDS and TH during dry season was 85.64 mg/l, 13.41 mg/l, 34.11 mg/l, 2.8 mg/l, 9.9 mg/l, 45.7 mg/l, 326.06 mg/l and 269.61 mg/l, respectively. Also, the average concentration of the parameters during rainy season was 77.3 mg/l, 18.27 mg/l, 30.3 mg/l, 1.9 mg/l, 12.54 mg/l, 39 mg/l, 269.1 mg/l and 316.17 mg/l, respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Divandarreh; Drinking water; Physicochemical quality; Rural area

Year:  2018        PMID: 30229041      PMCID: PMC6141269          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.06.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table Value of the data Based on the obtained data proper measure can be taken in order to deliver appropriate water quality to consumers. The collected data can be used for the preparation of research map in the field of water treatment by another researcher. The collected data can be useful for the codification of local standards along with other researcher׳s data.

Data

The specified parameters in the experiments are included calcium ion, magnesium ion, sodium ion, chloride ion, sulfate ion, temperature, total alkalinity, electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS) and pH analyzed according to standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater [1]. Water stability was evaluated based on RSI, LSI, PSI, AI and LS. The sampling points and study area was shown in Fig. 1. The chemical and physical characteristics of intended water samples are presented in Tables 1 and 2. Tables 3 and 4 shows the equations and indicators for categorizing the water stability. Calculation of water quality indices is shown in Table 5. Table 6 illustrates the stability indices in water resource. The condition of water stability in the water resources is shown in Table 7.
Fig. 1

Location and sampling points in Divandarreh city.

Table 1

Analyses of water quality parameters of the study area during dry seasons in 2015.

Sample nos.Ca+2(mg/l)Mg+2(mg/l)Na+(mg/l)K+(mg/l)Cl (mg/l)SO42(mg/l)AlkTH (mg/l)pHEC (μmhos/cm)TDS (mg/l)Tem C
16419152.45.587.05276238.97.8843728322.1
2649.790.42.9010.7200200.67.732320921.2
39625311.813.1845.6380343.87.6464241720.3
412820714.412.5557.74604037.7584755021.7
572102618.4938.8254221.58.0441927321.4
6645140.42.9316.6150180.87.9326717319.7
76410.2190.42.3626.2264202.337.3440626420.5
86210100.72.5412.9140196.57.5724515921.2
9481580.31.157.8140182.257.6219812821.8
1048880.63.0714190153.27.7728118220.3
1151.2980.41.569.6120165.47.8419012220.8
1243.220.560.32.0919.9230193.067.8235122819.9
1363.214.5100.42.4846.3210218.187.5641026819.2
1482.81330.31.5732.62202618.129919419.7
1558.410.5110.21.74417.5190189.587.6930019519.8
1659.23100.312.0225.2210160.57.8139525619.8
177212.7142.93.9621.7240232.77.8840726620.3
18762.6370.525.6965.4340200.87.7357437319.3
19111.23.1464.227.71562.2384290.876.9363041120
201044.575513.3371.7396278.688.1286256020.5
211123.7560.119.8959.8260295.47.4648931719.8
2255.25.48913.624.3954.9420160.417.3783654519.8
23922.5766.315.08260.6380240.47.6165142120.4
24723.59411.813.7260.2480194.537.44114174120.2
252112.5756.219.370.3380537.887.9592860520
261232582.820.4776.5340315.87.156336620.5
2795.21.6722.415.2763.1340244.648.1569445019.7
2898.4667311.6342.8230270.97.8853234518.8
2971.21908.419.7810450182.157.58108970818.9
3012030141.612.5144.9120424.57.6919312518.7
314030187.53.330220224.57.8336723919
326844912.70364160352.67.628118219.6
336030134.64.0324.3230274.57.7333021318.8
34156401615.5633.22105568.0439625820
3519042160.511.9934.8260649.38.2843428120.2
Max211449413.627.71364480649.38.28114174122.1
Min40130.11.150120153.26.93190122187
SD39.512.3303.4859.84103118.230.29251.6163.80.87
Mean85.6413.4134.112.89.945.7270.7269.617.73497.35323.0620.11
Table 2

Analyses of water quality parameters of the study area during rainy seasons in 2015.

Sample NoCa+2 (mg/l)Mg+2 (mg/l)Na+ (mg/l)K+ (mg/l)Cl (mg/l)SO42(mg/l)AlkTH (mg/l)pHEC (μmhos/cm)TDS (mg/l)Tem C
193.326290.212.826.57400341.157.4157737522
265.618.560.34.1915.8180240.787.2131720522
311222271.115.648.4340371.37.3260539321.5
46017.07161.36.5436.1180220.847.1130119621.8
56419.5140.23.7331.9200240.937.338625121.8
651.512.5140.23.8316.6140180.637.1427418021.9
76613.3130.21.6529.8200220.26.9533621921.8
8489.770.31.8417.3140160.37.3422014321.6
99316.6203.89.8321260301.397.3253534621.7
10541140.32.6121.3160180.657.1128218321
116814.6121.13.2723.6240230.59739625721.8
125912.740.22.6024.2140200.206.730219721.2
13722260.32.9142.9180271.37.342827721.8
1466.313.220.21.5732.6190220.537.131520521.6
1557.111.580.22.4034.2170190.487.2534722521.7
16489.770.23.6719.490160.267.217511421.6
17569.770.21.553.2150180.267.3427117721.2
189219.5553.336.8438.9280310.937.6965142321.9
195622203.119.3545.4210231.37.3337724621.9
209624.35612.123.452.2260340.847.865942822.2
2185.418.6525.416.440.8220290.697.349131622.8
229927.48514.935.0858.4380361.217.6985355722.9
238417724.219.1857.5320280.557.764441922.2
2415238.784215.8250.2360540.607.85110377521.2
2511229.3661.22859.4310401.67.7488457521.5
269022.6521.321.685.1300318.797.4158638021.6
278121.3945.420.625.9260290.97.670145421.4
286918.8640.419.675.7210250.527.153434721.6
2915537.3961.433.8643.1420542.37.9115274921.6
30508.970.28.550.5100161.947.1921013722
3171.117.6160.221.7445.3230250.797.347030622.2
32518.260.3436.2170161.536.931820621.4
3377.216.3110.21235.1160260.656.9539025422.3
3475.317.5140.38.01942.3180260.877.642027320.9
357614.6140.214.426.5210250.597.142627820.9
MAX15538.79614.936.8485.1420542.37.9115277522.9
MIN488.220.21.515.890160.256.717511420.9
SD267.329.673.2910.4716.418493.220.3236.8158.60.45
Mean77.318.2730.31.912.5439226.9269.17.3483.9316.1721.73
Table 3

List of indices and water quality in present work.

Water quality parameterFormulaReferences
Soluble Sodium Percentage (SSP)SSP=Na+KCa+Mg+Na+K*100[8]
Kelly׳s Ratio(KR)KR=NaCa+Mg[7]
Permeability Index (PI)PI =Na+K+HCO3Ca+Mg+Na+K*100[7]
Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)SAR=Na(Ca+Mg2)*100[5], [7]
Magnesium Hazard (MH)MH=MgCa+Mg[7]
Table 4

Corrosion and saturation indicator, equation and criteria for categorizing the stability of the water used in the present work [4], [5].

IndexEquationIndex valueWater condition
Ryznar stability index (RSI)RSI=2pHs–pHRSI<6Super saturated
pHs=A+B–log (Ca2+)–log (Alk)6<RSI<7Saturated
RSI>7Under saturated
Langelier saturation index (LSILSI=pH–pHsLSI>0Super saturated
LSI=0Saturated
LSI<0Under saturated
Aggressive index (AI)AI=pH+log[(alk)(H)]AI>12Non aggressive
10<AI<12Moderately aggressive
AI<10Very aggressive
Puckorius scaling index (PSI)PSI=2 (pHeq)–pHsPSI<6Scaling is unlikely to occur
pH=1.465+logPSI>7Likely to dissolve scale
(T.ALK)+4.54
pHeq 1.465×log
(T.ALK)+4.54
Table 5

Calculation of water quality indices in present work.

SampleDry season
Rainy season
SSPKRPIMHSARSSPKRPIMHSAR
113.030.1451.8632.90.42215.690.1847.4131.50.68
29.130.150.28200.285.30.0539.1731.760.16
316.90.247.14300.7313.960.1641.3724.50.60
428.450.3852.8720.51.5414.20.15847.66320.47
520.720.2657.318.70.7611.330.12744.7433.460.4
614.630.1751.711.420.4514.550.1750.4728.60.45
717.150.259.8220.820.5811.490.1347.96250.38
810.340.1145210.3128.90.09852.04250.24
98.910.09646.9340.2613.850.1443.4122.750.5
1010.610.11462.1921.60.284.80.0547.5625.150.13
119.790.1048.1222.50.2710.680.1149.1826.16160.34
126.520.06853.743.90.184.290.0440.5826.210.12
139.270.147.9427.50.34.730.0434.9833.530.16
142.580.0638.0920.560.082.050.0241.3324.730.06
1511.390.12752.6822.90.358.50.0948.724.940.25
1612.120.13662.977.70.348.820.0943.5250.24
1712.810.1350.0522.50.47.920.08548.0522.230.23
1828.770.470.675.31.1328.520.3953.2025.911.35
1926.600.34458.274.41.17317.070.1950.4439.330.57
2037.830.5866.276.71.9528.760.3650.3929.51.32
2129.210.4153.975.21.41729.260.3952.4226.441.32
2256.831.292.1813.93.0536.140.51358.2631.351.94
2341.900.772.074.32.1336.640.5662.5625.031.87
2453.031.0586.917.42.9325.560.3442.3329.61.57
2524.120.3041.731.91.4026.580.3647.2430.151.43
2629.110.455.612.61.4226.510.3652.1329.31.27
2739.490.6468.692.72.042.130.7062.7230.262.4
2835.580.5458.6891.7735.850.5659.6731.011.76
2953.181.0788.082.32.928.010.3945.4728.421.8
307.120.0722.50290.38.740.0944.8922.70.24
3117.900.1752.79550.5212.280.1446.33290.44
325.600.05627.3851.640.207.690.0855.47210.2
3311.100.1042.67450.348.500.093725.840.3
346.100.06321.8129.70.310.590.1140.127.70.38
355.180.05420.326.70.2710.930.124424.070.38
Max56.831.292.18553.0542.130.762.7239.332.4
Min2.580.0220.31.90.082.050.0235210.06
SD14.960.3016.8014.70.8710.990.176.693.90.66
Aver20.660.30353.69200.9416.60.2147.827.70.74
Table 6

Calculation stability indexes in water resource in the present work.

SampleDry season
Rainy season
RSILSIAIPSIRSILSIAIPSI
16.720.5912.527.86.60.4112.48.10
26.90.2712.27.537.7−0.2311.77.44
37.210.5912.68.066.70.3112.38
46.40.9012.928.227.86−0.3711.547.44
55.650.7512.77.737.55−0.1211.817.52
66.70.3612.317.38.16−0.51511.47.23
77.80−0.002127.87.9−0.4611.477.52
87.11−0.00811.917.238−0.3311.67.22
97.54−0.04211.847.237.050.13712.107.75
107.560.18412.137.4828.08−0.4811.457.34
117.330.11912.037.17.70−0.3811.567.7
127.620.24612.2157.648.53−0.91411.017.23
137.60.08412.087.67.6−0.1311.817.44
146.90.812.87.6057.8−0.3311.67.5
1570.17312.137.57.84−0.311.647.4
167.220.3212.307.68.50−0.711.236.9
177.10.5412.517.77.9−0.2611.77.3
1870.5112.5486.70.5212.57.80
197.50−0.06128.077.6−0.1311.87.6
205.91.0913.138.16.60.6212.67.75
216.60.32312.327.757.220.0411.977.60
2270.0812.138.156.340.6812.668.062
236.9730.5412.558.0636.60.5612.537.92
246.700.312.48.266.010.92138.0
256.341.1913.258.0636.430.6612.77.86
266.420.1212.1286.90.2712.247.87
275.801.02013.06870.3212.327.74
286.380.6012.637.647.71−0.3011.77.6
2970.3812.58.25.81.0613.118.15
306.710.2912.247.18.4−0.6011.36.94
316.980.1812.177.67.37−0.0311.917.64
327.700.07512.07.348.3−0.711.247.39
337.320.2812.277.647.92−0.4911.447.34
346.90.98137.67.30.1712.137.44
355.851.413.47.747.62−0.2611.77.57
Max7.801.413.48.268.51.0613.18.15
Min5.65−0.0611.847.15.8−0.91411.016.86
SD0.560.380.40.330.720.50.530.31
Aver6.90.4312.427.717.4−0.03127.6
Table 7

Water stability conditions in present work.

SampleDry season
Rainy season
RSILSIAIPSIRSILSIAIPSI
1S*StNA*CtSStNACt
2SStNACtCtCtMACt
3Ct**StNACtSStNACt
4SStNACtCtCtMACt
5St***StNACtCtCtMACt
6SStNACtCtCtMACt
7CtCtMA**CtCtCtMACt
8CtCtMACtCtCtMACt
9CtCtMACtCtStNACt
10CtStNACtCtCtMACt
11CtStNACtCtCtMACt
12CtStNACtCtCtMACt
13CtStNACtCtCtMACt
14SStNACtCtCtMACt
15SStNACtCtCtMACt
16CtStNACtCtCtMACt
17CtStNACtCtCtMACt
18SStNACtSStNACt
19CtCtMACtCtCtMACt
20StStNACtSStNACt
21SStNACtCtStMACt
22SStNACtSStNACt
23SStNACtSStNACt
24SStNACtSStNACt
25SStNACtSStNACt
26SStNACtSStNACt
27StStNACtSStNACt
28SStNACtCtCtMACt
29SStNACtStStNACt
30SStNACtCtCtMACt
31SStNACtCtCtMACt
32CtStNACtCtCtMACt
33CtStNACtCtCtMACt
34SStNACtCtStNACt
35StStNACtCtCtMACt

S*: Saturated Ct**: Corrosion tendency St***: Scaling tendency NA*: Non-Aggressive MA**: Moderately Aggressive.

Location and sampling points in Divandarreh city. Analyses of water quality parameters of the study area during dry seasons in 2015. Analyses of water quality parameters of the study area during rainy seasons in 2015. List of indices and water quality in present work. Corrosion and saturation indicator, equation and criteria for categorizing the stability of the water used in the present work [4], [5]. Calculation of water quality indices in present work. Calculation stability indexes in water resource in the present work. Water stability conditions in present work. S*: Saturated Ct**: Corrosion tendency St***: Scaling tendency NA*: Non-Aggressive MA**: Moderately Aggressive.

Experimental design, materials and methods

Description of study area

Divandarreh, one of the cities of Kurdistan province, located at west of Iran (35°54′N, 47°01′E). The city area is about 4203 km2 (approximately 15% of Kurdistan province area). The highest and lowest temperatures of air are 32 °C and −20 °C, respectively. According to the latest population census in Iran (2016), Divandarreh population was 81,000 persons.

Determine of water characteristics

To assessment of physiochemical parameters of the drinking water in rural area of Divandarreh province, 35 villages selected as sampling points. The samples were collected in rainy and dried seasons in 2015. The collected samples were delivered to laboratory in suitable conditions. After that, the samples were analyzed according to the standard methods for water and wastewater [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Measurement of temporary hardness, calcium, magnesium and chloride were carried out using titration method. Concentrations of fluoride, nitrate, and sulfate were determined by DR5000 spectrophotometer [1]. The EC and pH were analyzed with (Jenway 470 Conductivity meter) and pH meter (model Jenway 350), respectively.
Subject areaChemistry
More specific subject areaDrinking water quality
Type of dataTables and map
How data was acquiredAnalyses of temporary hardness, calcium, magnesium were conducted using titration method. The electrical conductivity and pH of samples were determined with (Jenway 470 Conductivity meter) and pH meter (model Jenway 350), respectively. Measurement of sulfate anions and cations was done by spectrophotometry (DR 5000; Hach) in water.
Data formatAnalyzed
Experimental factorsThe water samples stored at room temperature and were analyzed according to the APHA approach.
Experimental featuresThe levels of physical and chemical parameters were determined.
Data source locationDivandarreh, Kurdistan province, Iran
Data accessibilityData are included in this article
  2 in total

1.  Data on water quality index for the groundwater in rural area Neyshabur County, Razavi province, Iran.

Authors:  Mahmood Yousefi; Hossein Najafi Saleh; Ali Akbar Mohammadi; Amir Hossein Mahvi; Mansour Ghadrpoori; Hamed Suleimani
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2017-11-01

2.  Heavy metals analysis and quality assessment in drinking water - Khorramabad city, Iran.

Authors:  Mansour Ghaderpoori; Bahram Kamarehie; Ali Jafari; Afshin Ghaderpoury; Mohammadamin Karami
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2017-12-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.