Literature DB >> 31885066

Health risk assessment of heavy metals in cosmetic products sold in Iran: the Monte Carlo simulation.

Mansour Ghaderpoori1,2, Bahram Kamarehie1, Ali Jafari1, Abdol Azim Alinejad3, Yalda Hashempour4, Mohammad Hossein Saghi5, Mahmood Yousefi6, Gea Oliveri Conti7, Ali Akbar Mohammadi8, Afshin Ghaderpoury9, Margherita Ferrante10.   

Abstract

Cosmetics can contain harmful compounds such as heavy metals. Several metals have a cumulative effect on the body, especially fatty tissues, and may have different health effects on the human body over the long term. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to assess the health risks of heavy metals in cosmetics in Iran. Also, in this study, Monte Carlo simulation was used to investigate uncertainties. In this study, heavy metals data of cosmetics were extracted from studies carried out at intervals 2010-2018. International and Iranian databases such as Google Scholar, Web of Science, Springer, Science Direct, PubMed, Scopus, Irandoc, Magiran, Scientific Information Database (SID), and Information Institute for Scientific (ISC) were searched for this purpose. In this study, the index of the Margin of Safety was calculated to determine the risk of human contact with metallic impurities in cosmetic products used by humans. In the selected period, 11 studies were conducted on the measurement of heavy metals in cosmetics in Iran. In these studies, cosmetics such as eye shadow, eye pencil, powder, cream, and lipstick were studied. The Margin of Safety (MoS) values calculated for different metals were higher than the established safe standard by WHO. The highest and lowest amount of systemic exposure dosage in all types of cosmetic investigated (lipstick, cream, eye pencil, face powder, and eye shadow) was related to Fe and Hg. The mean hazardous quotient (HQ) for Cd, Cr, Ni, Cu, Mn, Zn, Pb, and Hg was 1.05E-03, 1.03E-01, 7.95E-03, 2.59E-03, 1.05E-03, 4.98E-03, 7.22E-04, 1.85E-01, and 1.35E-05, respectively. The highest HQ (6.10E-01) was found for Pb, which was observed in the cream.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cosmetic; Health risk assessment; Heavy metals; Monte Carlo simulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31885066     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-07423-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   5.190


  33 in total

1.  Exposure data for cosmetic products: facial cleanser, hair conditioner, and eye shadow.

Authors:  L J Loretz; A M Api; L Babcock; L M Barraj; J Burdick; K C Cater; G Jarrett; S Mann; Y H L Pan; T A Re; K J Renskers; C G Scrafford
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 6.023

2.  Effects of heavy metal accumulation on some reproductive characters in Armadillidium granulatum Brandt (Crustacea, Isopoda, Oniscidea).

Authors:  V Mazzei; G Longo; M V Brundo; C Copat; G Oliveri Conti; M Ferrante
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 6.291

3.  Trace elements in seafood from the Mediterranean sea: An exposure risk assessment.

Authors:  Chiara Copat; Alfina Grasso; Maria Fiore; Antonio Cristaldi; Pietro Zuccarello; Salvatore Santo Signorelli; Gea Oliveri Conti; Margherita Ferrante
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 6.023

4.  Measurement of nickel, cobalt and chromium in toy make-up by atomic absorption spectroscopy.

Authors:  Monica Corazza; Federica Baldo; Antonella Pagnoni; Roberta Miscioscia; Annarosa Virgili
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.437

5.  Non-cancer, cancer, and dermal sensitization risk assessment of heavy metals in cosmetics.

Authors:  Duck Soo Lim; Tae Hyun Roh; Min Kook Kim; Yong Chan Kwon; Seul Min Choi; Seung Jun Kwack; Kyu Bong Kim; Sungpil Yoon; Hyung Sik Kim; Byung-Mu Lee
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2018-03-28

Review 6.  Toxic metals contained in cosmetics: a status report.

Authors:  Beatrice Bocca; Anna Pino; Alessandro Alimonti; Giovanni Forte
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.271

7.  Assessment of lead in cosmetic products.

Authors:  Iman Al-Saleh; Sami Al-Enazi; Neptune Shinwari
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.271

8.  Carcinogenic and Non-carcinogenic Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Groundwater Wells in Neyshabur Plain, Iran.

Authors:  Hossein Najafi Saleh; Maryam Panahande; Mahmood Yousefi; Farzaneh Baghal Asghari; Gea Oliveri Conti; Elham Talaee; Ali Akbar Mohammadi
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Assessment of lead and cadmium levels in frequently used cosmetic products in Iran.

Authors:  H Nourmoradi; M Foroghi; M Farhadkhani; M Vahid Dastjerdi
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2013-09-23

10.  Heavy metal content of selected personal care products (PCPs) available in Ibadan, Nigeria and their toxic effects.

Authors:  Sunday Samuel Omenka; Adebola Abosede Adeyi
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2016-08-05
View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of cigarette butt on concentration of heavy metals in landfill leachate: health and ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Javad Torkashvand; Kazem Godini; Samira Norouzi; Mitra Gholami; Mojtaba Yeganeh; Mahdi Farzadkia
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2021-02-19

2.  Trace Metal Lead Exposure in Typical Lip Cosmetics From Electronic Commercial Platform: Investigation, Health Risk Assessment and Blood Lead Level Analysis.

Authors:  Yanan Li; Yanyan Fang; Zehua Liu; Yahan Zhang; Kangli Liu; Luping Jiang; Boyuan Yang; Yongdie Yang; Yongwei Song; Chaoyang Liu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-11-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.