Literature DB >> 29540401

Indications for and clinical procedures resulting from magnetic resonance imaging of the knee in older patients: Are we choosing wisely?

Marc-Etienne Parent1, François Vézina2, Nathalie Carrier3, Ariel Masetto4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the indications for and clinical procedures resulting from knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in older patients.
DESIGN: We retrospectively analyzed 215 medical records of patients 50 years of age and older who had undergone a unilateral knee MRI in 2009.
SETTING: Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke in Quebec. PARTICIPANTS: Patients 50 years of age and older who underwent a knee MRI in 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was an invasive procedure in the same knee that underwent an MRI. Medical charts were reviewed up to 2014 for patient characteristics, MRI indication, ordering physician specialty, radiography before MRI, MRI findings, and clinical procedures resulting from the MRI.
RESULTS: The patients' mean (SD) age was 60.6 (7.5) years. The main MRI indications were meniscopathy (148 [68.8%]) and chronic pain (92 [42.8%]). The main MRI findings were osteoarthritis (OA) (185 [86.0%]) and meniscal lesions (170 [79.1%]). Only 82 (38.1%) patients had a plain radiograph in the 24 months preceding the MRI, usually without a standing anteroposterior view. Findings on pre-MRI radiography (n = 201) demonstrated OA in 144 (71.6%) patients. Overall, 87 (40.5%) patients were seen by an orthopedic surgeon and 27 (31.0%) of these patients underwent an invasive intervention. Among the 81 patients with moderate to severe OA on MRI, 36 (44.4%) had radiographic evidence of moderate to severe OA and only 3 (3.7%) underwent arthroscopic meniscectomy.
CONCLUSION: Our study reproduces the known association between OA and degenerative meniscal changes in older patients. We have found a surprising underuse of the standing anteroposterior view on radiography. Most patients in our cohort could have been appropriately diagnosed and treated based on such radiographic information, as demonstrated by pre-MRI findings, thus avoiding the MRI and subsequent evaluation by an orthopedic surgeon. Meniscectomy was rarely performed, particularly in patients with advanced OA. Educational and pragmatic measures must be emphasized to encourage the use of radiography and to limit the inappropriate use of MRI, a costly technique. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29540401      PMCID: PMC5851409     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  17 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and computed tomography for the detection of chondral lesions of the knee.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Benjamin T Drew; Andoni P Toms; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: evidence-based guideline, 2nd edition.

Authors:  David S Jevsevar
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 3.  Choosing the right diagnostic imaging modality in musculoskeletal diagnosis.

Authors:  Andrea L Aagesen; Maged Melek
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 2.907

4.  Choosing wisely: the American College of Rheumatology's Top 5 list of things physicians and patients should question.

Authors:  Jinoos Yazdany; Gabriela Schmajuk; Mark Robbins; David Daikh; Ashley Beall; Edward Yelin; Jennifer Barton; Adam Carlson; Mary Margaretten; Joann Zell; Lianne S Gensler; Victoria Kelly; Kenneth Saag; Charles King
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 5.  Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative tears of the meniscus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Moin Khan; Nathan Evaniew; Asheesh Bedi; Olufemi R Ayeni; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging use by primary care physicians.

Authors:  R A Baldor; M E Quirk; D Dohan
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Meniscal abnormalities in the asymptomatic population at MR imaging.

Authors:  J Kornick; E Trefelner; S McCarthy; R Lange; K Lynch; P Jokl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  The clinical importance of meniscal tears demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging in osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Timothy Bhattacharyya; Daniel Gale; Peter Dewire; Saara Totterman; M Elon Gale; Sara McLaughlin; Thomas A Einhorn; David T Felson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  A randomized trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Alexandra Kirkley; Trevor B Birmingham; Robert B Litchfield; J Robert Giffin; Kevin R Willits; Cindy J Wong; Brian G Feagan; Allan Donner; Sharon H Griffin; Linda M D'Ascanio; Janet E Pope; Peter J Fowler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Use of knee magnetic resonance imaging by primary care physicians in patients aged 40 years and older.

Authors:  David J Petron; Patrick E Greis; Stephen K Aoki; Stuart Black; Derek Krete; Kinjal B Sohagia; Robert Burks
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.843

View more
  4 in total

1.  Protocol for the Request of Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Elderly Patients with Suspected Osteoarthritis: Reduction in Test Requests and Impact on Management and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Gustavo Gonçalves Arliani; Juliana Munhoz Vergara; Isaias Duarte Mesquita Júnior; Victor Otávio Oliveira; Paulo Henrique Schmidt Lara; Gabriel Ferraz Ferreira
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-03-31

2.  Preferences and beliefs of Dutch orthopaedic surgeons and patients reduce the implementation of "Choosing Wisely" recommendations in degenerative knee disease.

Authors:  T Rietbergen; R L Diercks; I Anker-van der Wel; M E van den Akker-van Marle; N Lopuhaä; R P A Janssen; H M J van der Linden-van der Zwaag; R G H H Nelissen; P J Marang-van de Mheen; L van Bodegom-Vos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Radiographic vs. MRI vs. arthroscopic assessment and grading of knee osteoarthritis - are we using appropriate imaging?

Authors:  Samuel Newman; Huzefah Ahmed; Nader Rehmatullah
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-01-03

Review 4.  Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elin Kjelle; Eivind Richter Andersen; Arne Magnus Krokeide; Lesley J J Soril; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Fiona M Clement; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.795

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.