Literature DB >> 24209722

Choosing the right diagnostic imaging modality in musculoskeletal diagnosis.

Andrea L Aagesen1, Maged Melek.   

Abstract

Radiological studies can confirm or rule out competing diagnoses for musculoskeletal injuries and pain. Obtaining a detailed history and physical examination is pivotal for localizing the pain generator and choosing the most appropriate imaging studies, based on the suspected injured tissue. Judicious use of imaging is important to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure, minimize cost, and avoid therapy targeting asymptomatic imaging abnormalities. This article compares and contrasts the diagnostic imaging commonly used for detecting musculoskeletal injuries.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthrogram; Computed tomography; Diagnostic imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Radiographs; Radiology

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24209722     DOI: 10.1016/j.pop.2013.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prim Care        ISSN: 0095-4543            Impact factor:   2.907


  6 in total

1.  Impact of systematic ultrasound of the knee on the rheumatologist's clinical decision in patients consulting for knee pain.

Authors:  Mathilde Couturier; Anaïs Arbault; Davy Laroche; Elise Contant; Aurélien Lambert; Pierre Pottecher; Paul Ornetti
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Indications for and clinical procedures resulting from magnetic resonance imaging of the knee in older patients: Are we choosing wisely?

Authors:  Marc-Etienne Parent; François Vézina; Nathalie Carrier; Ariel Masetto
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Radiographic sclerotic contour loss in the identification of glenoid bone loss.

Authors:  Troy D Bornes; Jacob L Jaremko; Lauren A Beaupre; Martin J Bouliane
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Appropriateness of knee MRI prescriptions: clinical, economic and technical issues.

Authors:  F M Solivetti; A Guerrisi; N Salducca; F Desiderio; D Graceffa; G Capodieci; P Romeo; I Sperduti; S Canitano
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  MRi of the knee compared to specialized radiography for measurements of articular cartilage height in knees with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Jacob Fyhring Mortensen; Kristian Breds Geoffroy Mongelard; Dimitar Ivanov Radev; Andreas Kappel; Lasse Enkebølle Rasmussen; Svend Erik Østgaard; Anders Odgaard
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-12

Review 6.  Systematic review of quantitative imaging biomarkers for neck and shoulder musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Judith E Gold; David M Hallman; Fredrik Hellström; Martin Björklund; Albert G Crenshaw; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Mary F Barbe; Sayed Ali
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.