BACKGROUND: Secondary use of electronic health record (EHR) data can reduce costs of research and quality reporting. However, EHR data must be consistent within and across organizations. Flowsheet data provide a rich source of interprofessional data and represents a high volume of documentation; however, content is not standardized. Health care organizations design and implement customized content for different care areas creating duplicative data that is noncomparable. In a prior study, 10 information models (IMs) were derived from an EHR that included 2.4 million patients. There was a need to evaluate the generalizability of the models across organizations. The pain IM was selected for evaluation and refinement because pain is a commonly occurring problem associated with high costs for pain management. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to validate and further refine a pain IM from EHR flowsheet data that standardizes pain concepts, definitions, and associated value sets for assessments, goals, interventions, and outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted using an iterative consensus-based approach to map, analyze, and evaluate data from 10 organizations. RESULTS: The aggregated metadata from the EHRs of 8 large health care organizations and the design build in 2 additional organizations represented flowsheet data from 6.6 million patients, 27 million encounters, and 683 million observations. The final pain IM has 30 concepts, 4 panels (classes), and 396 value set items. Results are built on Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) pain assessment terms and extend the need for additional terms to support interoperability. CONCLUSION: The resulting pain IM is a consensus model based on actual EHR documentation in the participating health systems. The IM captures the most important concepts related to pain. Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart.
BACKGROUND: Secondary use of electronic health record (EHR) data can reduce costs of research and quality reporting. However, EHR data must be consistent within and across organizations. Flowsheet data provide a rich source of interprofessional data and represents a high volume of documentation; however, content is not standardized. Health care organizations design and implement customized content for different care areas creating duplicative data that is noncomparable. In a prior study, 10 information models (IMs) were derived from an EHR that included 2.4 million patients. There was a need to evaluate the generalizability of the models across organizations. The pain IM was selected for evaluation and refinement because pain is a commonly occurring problem associated with high costs for pain management. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to validate and further refine a pain IM from EHR flowsheet data that standardizes pain concepts, definitions, and associated value sets for assessments, goals, interventions, and outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted using an iterative consensus-based approach to map, analyze, and evaluate data from 10 organizations. RESULTS: The aggregated metadata from the EHRs of 8 large health care organizations and the design build in 2 additional organizations represented flowsheet data from 6.6 million patients, 27 million encounters, and 683 million observations. The final pain IM has 30 concepts, 4 panels (classes), and 396 value set items. Results are built on Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) pain assessment terms and extend the need for additional terms to support interoperability. CONCLUSION: The resulting pain IM is a consensus model based on actual EHR documentation in the participating health systems. The IM captures the most important concepts related to pain. Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart.
Authors: Bonnie L Westra; Beverly Christie; Steven G Johnson; Lisiane Pruinelli; Anne LaFlamme; Suzan G Sherman; Jung In Park; Connie W Delaney; Grace Gao; Stuart Speedie Journal: Comput Inform Nurs Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Marcelline R Harris; Laura Heermann Langford; Holly Miller; Mary Hook; Patricia C Dykes; Susan A Matney Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2015-02-10 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Marilyn Chow; Murielle Beene; Ann O'Brien; Patricia Greim; Tim Cromwell; Donna DuLong; Diane Bedecarré Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2015-02-05 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Steven G Johnson; Matthew D Byrne; Beverly Christie; Connie W Delaney; Anne LaFlamme; Jung In Park; Lisiane Pruinelli; Suzan G Sherman; Stuart Speedie; Bonnie L Westra Journal: AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc Date: 2015-03-25
Authors: Bonnie L Westra; Kay S Lytle; Luann Whittenburg; Mischa Adams; Samira Ali; Meg Furukawa; Stephanie Hartleben; Mary Hook; Steve Johnson; Sarah Collins Rossetti; Tess Theresa Settergren Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2020-11-01 Impact factor: 4.497