Marcelline R Harris1, Laura Heermann Langford2, Holly Miller3, Mary Hook4, Patricia C Dykes5, Susan A Matney6. 1. Department of Systems Leadership and Effectiveness Science, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA mrhrrs@umich.edu. 2. Homer Warner Center for Informatics Research, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 3. Terminology Division, Knowledge Based Systems, Veterans Health Administration Office of Informatics and Analytics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 4. Knowledge-Based Nursing Department, Aurora Health System, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 5. Center for Nursing Excellence, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 6. 3M Health Information Systems, Murray, UT, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Currently, the processes for harmonizing and extending standards by leveraging the knowledge within local documentation artifacts are not well described. We describe a collaborative project to develop common information models, terminology bindings, and term definitions based on nursing documentation systems, and carry the findings through to the adoption in standards development organizations (SDOs) and technical implementations in clinical applications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nursing flowsheet documents from six large organizations were analyzed to generate a common information model and terminologies that fully expressed documentation across all systems, and were sufficient for evidence-based decision support, reporting, and analysis. RESULTS: Significant gaps in existing standards were identified. The models and terminologies were submitted to and incorporated by SDOs, are published, implemented, and now serving as a foundation for an eMeasure. DISCUSSION: There are few examples in the literature of success working through the standards development process from a bottom-up perspective. Subsequently, standards do not yet fully address the need for detailed clinical data that enables, for example, decision support as well as a range of reporting and analytic requirements. Recommendations from this project include transparent processes within SDOs, registries that make models and associated terminologies freely available, and coordinated governance processes. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the feasibility of using documentation artifacts in a bottom-up approach to develop common models and sets of terms that are complete from the perspective of clinical implementation. Importantly, we demonstrated a process by which a community of practice can contribute to closing gaps in existing standards using SDO processes.
OBJECTIVE: Currently, the processes for harmonizing and extending standards by leveraging the knowledge within local documentation artifacts are not well described. We describe a collaborative project to develop common information models, terminology bindings, and term definitions based on nursing documentation systems, and carry the findings through to the adoption in standards development organizations (SDOs) and technical implementations in clinical applications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nursing flowsheet documents from six large organizations were analyzed to generate a common information model and terminologies that fully expressed documentation across all systems, and were sufficient for evidence-based decision support, reporting, and analysis. RESULTS: Significant gaps in existing standards were identified. The models and terminologies were submitted to and incorporated by SDOs, are published, implemented, and now serving as a foundation for an eMeasure. DISCUSSION: There are few examples in the literature of success working through the standards development process from a bottom-up perspective. Subsequently, standards do not yet fully address the need for detailed clinical data that enables, for example, decision support as well as a range of reporting and analytic requirements. Recommendations from this project include transparent processes within SDOs, registries that make models and associated terminologies freely available, and coordinated governance processes. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the feasibility of using documentation artifacts in a bottom-up approach to develop common models and sets of terms that are complete from the perspective of clinical implementation. Importantly, we demonstrated a process by which a community of practice can contribute to closing gaps in existing standards using SDO processes.
Authors: Paul E Drawz; Patrick Archdeacon; Clement J McDonald; Neil R Powe; Kimberly A Smith; Jenna Norton; Desmond E Williams; Uptal D Patel; Andrew Narva Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-06-25 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Bonnie L Westra; Beverly Christie; Steven G Johnson; Lisiane Pruinelli; Anne LaFlamme; Suzan G Sherman; Jung In Park; Connie W Delaney; Grace Gao; Stuart Speedie Journal: Comput Inform Nurs Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Bonnie L Westra; Kay S Lytle; Luann Whittenburg; Mischa Adams; Samira Ali; Meg Furukawa; Stephanie Hartleben; Mary Hook; Steve Johnson; Sarah Collins Rossetti; Tess Theresa Settergren Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2020-11-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Bonnie L Westra; Steven G Johnson; Samira Ali; Karen M Bavuso; Christopher A Cruz; Sarah Collins; Meg Furukawa; Mary L Hook; Anne LaFlamme; Kay Lytle; Lisiane Pruinelli; Tari Rajchel; Theresa Tess Settergren; Kathryn F Westman; Luann Whittenburg Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Bonnie L Westra; Beverly Christie; Steven G Johnson; Lisiane Pruinelli; Anne LaFlamme; Jung In Park; Suzan G Sherman; Matthew D Byrne; Piper Ranallo; Stuart Speedie Journal: AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc Date: 2016-07-20
Authors: G M Keenan; Y Yao; K Dunn Lopez; V E C Sousa; J Stifter; T G R Macieira; A D Boyd; T H Herdman; S Moorhead; A McDaniel; D J Wilkie Journal: Int J Nurs Knowl Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 1.222