Literature DB >> 29539395

On the Origin of Microtubules' High-Pressure Sensitivity.

Mimi Gao1, Melanie Berghaus1, Simone Möbitz1, Vitor Schuabb1, Nelli Erwin1, Marius Herzog1, Karin Julius2, Christian Sternemann2, Roland Winter3.   

Abstract

For over 50 years, it has been known that the mitosis of eukaryotic cells is inhibited already at high hydrostatic pressure conditions of 30 MPa. This effect has been attributed to the disorganization of microtubules, the main component of the spindle apparatus. However, the structural details of the depolymerization and the origin of the pressure sensitivity have remained elusive. It has also been a puzzle how complex organisms could still successfully inhabit extreme high-pressure environments such as those encountered in the depth of oceans. We studied the pressure stability of microtubules at different structural levels and for distinct dynamic states using high-pressure Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and Synchrotron small-angle x-ray scattering. We show that microtubules are hardly stable under abyssal conditions, where pressures up to 100 MPa are reached. This high-pressure sensitivity can be mainly attributed to the internal voids and packing defects in the microtubules. In particular, we show that lateral and longitudinal contacts feature different pressure stabilities, and they define also the pressure stability of tubulin bundles. The intactness of both contact types is necessary for the functionality of microtubules in vivo. Despite being known to dynamically stabilize microtubules and prevent their depolymerization, we found that the anti-cancer drug taxol and the accessory protein MAP2c decrease the pressure stability of microtubule protofilaments. Moreover, we demonstrate that the cellular environment itself is a crowded place and accessory proteins can increase the pressure stability of microtubules and accelerate their otherwise highly pressure-sensitive de novo formation.
Copyright © 2018 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29539395      PMCID: PMC5883572          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  67 in total

1.  AFM force measurements on microtubule-associated proteins: the projection domain exerts a long-range repulsive force.

Authors:  R Mukhopadhyay; J H Hoh
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2001-09-21       Impact factor: 4.124

2.  High-pressure FTIR study of the stability of horseradish peroxidase. Effect of heme substitution, ligand binding, Ca++ removal, and reduction of the disulfide bonds.

Authors:  L Smeller; F Meersman; J Fidy; K Heremans
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 3.  Microtubule nucleation.

Authors:  Didier Job; Odile Valiron; Berl Oakley
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 8.382

4.  Cell biology: join the crowd.

Authors:  R John Ellis; Allen P Minton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Cavities determine the pressure unfolding of proteins.

Authors:  Julien Roche; Jose A Caro; Douglas R Norberto; Philippe Barthe; Christian Roumestand; Jamie L Schlessman; Angel E Garcia; Bertrand E García-Moreno; Catherine A Royer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Kinetic Insights into the Elongation Reaction of Actin Filaments as a Function of Temperature, Pressure, and Macromolecular Crowding.

Authors:  Mimi Gao; Roland Winter
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.102

7.  High-resolution microtubule structures reveal the structural transitions in αβ-tubulin upon GTP hydrolysis.

Authors:  Gregory M Alushin; Gabriel C Lander; Elizabeth H Kellogg; Rui Zhang; David Baker; Eva Nogales
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Crowders and Cosolvents-Major Contributors to the Cellular Milieu and Efficient Means to Counteract Environmental Stresses.

Authors:  Mimi Gao; Christoph Held; Satyajit Patra; Loana Arns; Gabriele Sadowski; Roland Winter
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.102

9.  Tubulin secondary structure analysis, limited proteolysis sites, and homology to FtsZ.

Authors:  J M de Pereda; D Leynadier; J A Evangelio; P Chacón; J M Andreu
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1996-11-12       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Pressure-induced depolymerization of spindle microtubules. I. Changes in birefringence and spindle length.

Authors:  E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of X-ray free-electron laser-induced shockwaves on haemoglobin microcrystals delivered in a liquid jet.

Authors:  Marie Luise Grünbein; Alexander Gorel; Lutz Foucar; Sergio Carbajo; William Colocho; Sasha Gilevich; Elisabeth Hartmann; Mario Hilpert; Mark Hunter; Marco Kloos; Jason E Koglin; Thomas J Lane; Jim Lewandowski; Alberto Lutman; Karol Nass; Gabriela Nass Kovacs; Christopher M Roome; John Sheppard; Robert L Shoeman; Miriam Stricker; Tim van Driel; Sharon Vetter; R Bruce Doak; Sébastien Boutet; Andrew Aquila; Franz Josef Decker; Thomas R M Barends; Claudiu Andrei Stan; Ilme Schlichting
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Morphological and molecular evolution of hadal amphipod's eggs provides insights into embryogenesis under high hydrostatic pressure.

Authors:  Wenhao Li; Faxiang Wang; Shouwen Jiang; Binbin Pan; Qi Liu; Qianghua Xu
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-09-12

Review 3.  Molecular cancer cell responses to solid compressive stress and interstitial fluid pressure.

Authors:  Purboja Purkayastha; Manish K Jaiswal; Tanmay P Lele
Journal:  Cytoskeleton (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-07-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.