Literature DB >> 29537715

Magnetic resonance elastography and T1 mapping for early diagnosis and classification of chronic pancreatitis.

Min Wang1, Feng Gao2, Xiaoqi Wang3, Yanqing Liu1, Ruoyun Ji1, Lizhuo Cang1, Yu Shi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early detection and classification of chronic pancreatitis (CP) are both important and challenging.
PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic performance of MR elastography (MRE) and T1 mapping of the pancreas for different stages of CP. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective.
SUBJECTS: Clinical and imaging records of 81 patients (from 5/2015 to 7/2017) with suspected CP were analyzed. Patients were categorized into the normal control (n = 35), mild CP (n = 30), and moderate/severe CP groups (n = 16) according to the Cambridge Classification based on concordant endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or ultrasound endoscopy findings. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T pancreatic MRI, which included MRE and T1 mapping. ASSESSMENT: T1 relaxation times, pancreatic stiffness values, the main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter, and pancreatic thickness were measured in all patients. Statistical Tests: Cutoff values of T1 relaxation times and pancreatic stiffness values for diagnosis of CP were calculated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Associations of imaging parameters with different stages of CP were assessed using logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Both T1 relaxation times (865 ± 220 msec vs. 1075 ± 221 msec vs. 1350 ± 139 msec) and pancreatic stiffness (1.21 ± 0.13 kPa vs. 1.50 ± 0.15 kPa vs. 1.90 ± 0.16 kPa) differed significantly (P < 0.001) among the control, mild CP, and moderate/severe CP groups. Pancreatic stiffness (>1.34 kPa) achieved significantly higher area under the curve (AUC) than T1 relaxation time (>908.4 msec) for detection of mild CP (AUC: 0.928 vs. 0.751, P = 0.011). Pancreatic stiffness values (>1.61 kPa) also achieved significantly higher AUC than T1 relaxation time (>1131.6 msec) (AUC: 0.981 vs. 0.910, P = 0.033) for diagnosing moderate/severe CP from the other two groups. Multiple regression analysis showed that T1 relaxation time and stiffness were the independent factors associated with mild CP (P = 0.025 and <0.001, respectively). DATA
CONCLUSION: Both MRE and T1 mapping are promising quantitative imaging methods for evaluation of CP; MRE slightly outperformed T1 mapping. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.
© 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MR elastography; T1 mapping; chronic pancreatitis; diagnosis

Year:  2018        PMID: 29537715      PMCID: PMC6138575          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  34 in total

1.  EUS-based criteria for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: the Rosemont classification.

Authors:  Marc F Catalano; Anand Sahai; Michael Levy; Joseph Romagnuolo; Maurits Wiersema; William Brugge; Martin Freeman; Kenji Yamao; Marcia Canto; Lyndon V Hernandez
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Quantitative elastography associated with endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Julio Iglesias-Garcia; J Enrique Domínguez-Muñoz; Marga Castiñeira-Alvariño; Maria Luaces-Regueira; Jose Lariño-Noia
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 3.  Elastography for the pancreas: Current status and future perspective.

Authors:  Natsuko Kawada; Sachiko Tanaka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Usefulness of shear wave elastography as a quantitative diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Takamichi Kuwahara; Yoshiki Hirooka; Hiroki Kawashima; Eizaburo Ohno; Takuya Ishikawa; Takeshi Yamamura; Kazuhiro Furukawa; Kohei Funasaka; Masanao Nakamura; Ryoji Miyahara; Osamu Watanabe; Masatoshi Ishigami; Senju Hashimoto; Hidemi Goto
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.029

Review 6.  Diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: Functional testing.

Authors:  J Enrique Domínguez Muñoz
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.043

7.  Usefulness of percutaneous elastography by acoustic radiation force impulse for the non-invasive diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Camilo Julio Llamoza-Torres; Maria Fuentes-Pardo; Francisco Javier Álvarez-Higueras; Fernando Alberca-de-Las-Parras; Fernando Carballo-Álvarez
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Feasibility of using 3D MR elastography to determine pancreatic stiffness in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Yu Shi; Kevin J Glaser; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Ephraim I Ben-Abraham; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  MR elastography for the assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection: does histologic necroinflammation influence the measurement of hepatic stiffness?

Authors:  Yu Shi; Qiyong Guo; Fei Xia; Bogdan Dzyubak; Kevin J Glaser; Qiuju Li; Jiahui Li; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Diagnostic performance of imaging modalities in chronic pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Y Issa; M A Kempeneers; H C van Santvoort; T L Bollen; S Bipat; M A Boermeester
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  13 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance fingerprinting of the pancreas at 1.5 T and 3.0 T.

Authors:  Eva M Serrao; Dimitri A Kessler; Bruno Carmo; Lucian Beer; Kevin M Brindle; Guido Buonincontri; Ferdia A Gallagher; Fiona J Gilbert; Edmund Godfrey; Martin J Graves; Mary A McLean; Evis Sala; Rolf F Schulte; Joshua D Kaggie
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Influence of fat deposition on T1 mapping of the pancreas: evaluation by dual-flip-angle MR imaging with and without fat suppression.

Authors:  Mayumi Higashi; Masahiro Tanabe; Munemasa Okada; Matakazu Furukawa; Etsushi Iida; Katsuyoshi Ito
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging T1 relaxation times for the liver, pancreas and spleen in healthy children at 1.5 and 3 tesla.

Authors:  Leah A Gilligan; Jonathan R Dillman; Jean A Tkach; Stavra A Xanthakos; Jacqueline K Gill; Andrew T Trout
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-05-02

4.  Precision Medicine in Pancreatic Disease-Knowledge Gaps and Research Opportunities: Summary of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop.

Authors:  Mark E Lowe; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Caprioli; Jyoti Choudhary; Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate; Anil K Dasyam; Christopher E Forsmark; Fred S Gorelick; Joe W Gray; Mark Haupt; Kimberly A Kelly; Kenneth P Olive; Sylvia K Plevritis; Noa Rappaport; Holger R Roth; Hanno Steen; S Joshua Swamidass; Temel Tirkes; Aliye Uc; Kirill Veselkov; David C Whitcomb; Aida Habtezion
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  Accelerating the Drug Delivery Pipeline for Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis: Summary of the Working Group on Drug Development and Trials in Chronic Pancreatitis at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop.

Authors:  Christopher E Forsmark; Dana K Andersen; John T Farrar; Megan Golden; Aida Habtezion; Sohail Z Husain; Liang Li; Julia Mayerle; Stephen J Pandol; Aliye Uc; Zixi Zhu; Dhiraj Yadav
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 6.  Quantitative pancreatic MRI: a pathology-based review.

Authors:  Manil D Chouhan; Louisa Firmin; Samantha Read; Zahir Amin; Stuart A Taylor
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  New and Emerging Applications of Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Other Abdominal Organs.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Ying Deng; Danielle Jondal; David M Woodrum; Yu Shi; Meng Yin; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10

8.  Normative Pancreatic Stiffness Levels and Related Influences Established by Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Volunteers.

Authors:  Youli Xu; Xiaoli Cai; Yu Shi; Meng Yin; Gongyu Lan; Xianyi Zhang; Ruoyun Ji
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  T1 mapping for the diagnosis of early chronic pancreatitis: correlation with Cambridge classification system.

Authors:  Monica Cheng; Mark A Gromski; Evan L Fogel; John M DeWitt; Aashish A Patel; Temel Tirkes
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  The pancreatic exocrine function in patients with pancreatic endocrine insufficiency: the evaluation with cine-dynamic magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using a spatially selective inversion-recovery pulse and T1 mapping.

Authors:  Mayumi Higashi; Masahiro Tanabe; Teppei Yonezawa; Matakazu Furukawa; Etsushi Iida; Katsuyoshi Ito
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.