| Literature DB >> 29536321 |
Antonio Esposito1,2, Anna Palmisano3,4, Sofia Antunes5, Caterina Colantoni3,4, Paola Maria Vittoria Rancoita6, Davide Vignale3,4, Francesca Baratto7, Paolo Della Bella7, Alessandro Del Maschio3,4, Francesco De Cobelli3,4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Diffuse remodeling of myocardial extra-cellular matrix is largely responsible for left ventricle (LV) dysfunction and arrhythmias. Our hypothesis is that the texture analysis of late iodine enhancement (LIE) cardiac computed tomography (cCT) images may improve characterization of the diffuse extra-cellular matrix changes. Our aim was to extract volumetric extracellular volume (ECV) and LIE texture features of non-scarred (remote) myocardium from cCT of patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia (rVT), and to compare these radiomic features with LV-function, LV-remodeling, and underlying cardiac disease. PROCEDURES: Forty-eight patients suffering from rVT were prospectively enrolled: 5/48 with idiopathic VT (IVT), 23/48 with post-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (ICM), 9/48 with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM), and 11/48 with scars from a previous healed myocarditis (MYO). All patients underwent echocardiography to assess LV systolic and diastolic function and cCT with pre-contrast, angiographic, and LIE scan to obtain end-diastolic volume (EDV), ECV, and first-order texture parameters of Hounsfield Unit (HU) of remote myocardium in LIE [energy, entropy, HU-mean, HU-median, standard deviation (SD), and mean absolute deviation (MAD)].Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac computed tomography; Extracellular volume fraction; Heterogeneity; Late iodine enhancement; Myocardial characterization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29536321 PMCID: PMC6153681 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-018-1175-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Imaging Biol ISSN: 1536-1632 Impact factor: 3.488
Baseline characteristics
| All patients | ICM | IDCM | MYO | IVT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, year | 61 ± 15 | 67 ± 8* | 67 ± 6° | 46 ± 18*,° | 56 ± 20 | 0.00008* |
| Sex, female/male | 4/44 | 0/23 | 2/8 | 2/11 | 0/5 | n.s. |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 26 ± 3 | 26 ± 3 | 27 ± 4 | 24 ± 2 | 25 ± 3 | n.s. |
| Hypertension | 23/48 | 9/23 | 2/9 | 3/11 | 3/5 | n.s. |
| Diabetes | 7/48 | 5/23 | 2/9 | 0/11 | 0/5 | n.s. |
| Hyperlipidemia | 18/48 | 9/23*° | 2/9 | 1/11° | 0/5* | 0.03* |
| ICD (pts) | 36/48 | 20/23 | 8/9 | 6/11 | 2/5 | n.s. |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 66 ± 10 | 64 ± 9 | 74 ± 14 | 63 ± 10 | 63 ± 10 | n.s. |
| EF, % | 43 ± 13 | 38 ± 10 *,§ | 34 ± 11°,¶ | 52 ± 7*,° | 58 ± 13 §,¶ | 0.003*; 0.002°; 0.001§; 0.0005¶ |
| EDD, mm | 59 ± 9 | 61 ± 8§ | 66 ± 7°,¶ | 54 ± 7° | 47 ± 8§,¶ | 0.004°; 0.002§; 0.0001¶ |
| EDV, ml | 276 ± 88 | 301 ± 87*,§ | 332 ± 35*,§ | 218 ± 51*,° | 184 ± 35§,¶ | 0.025*; 0.001°; 0.046§; 0.003¶ |
| Diastolic function | 15 | * | ° | *,° | 3 | 0.0005*; 0.002° |
| Left atrium volume, ml | 133 ± 62 | 133 ± 39* | 193 ± 98*,°,¶ | 102 ± 32° | 91 ± 42¶ | 0.04*; 0.003°; 0.02¶ |
Values are mean ± SD, unless otherwise indicated. Statistically significant diferences are indicated by symbols near to each variable; the relative p value is reported in the last column and labeled with the same symbol
ICM ischemic cardiomyopathy, IDCM idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, MYO post-myocarditis syndrome, IVT idiopathic ventricular tachycardia, BMI Body Mass Index, ICD implantable cardioventer defibrillator, EF left ventricular ejection fraction, EDD left ventricular end diastolic diameter, EDV left ventricular end diastolic volume, LAV left atrium volume, n.s. no statistically significant difference
Texture features of late iodine enhanced (LIE) images and volumetric extracellular volume fraction (ECV) from cardiac CT examination
| All patients | ICM | IDCM | MYO | IVT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECV | 42 ± 7 | 44 ± 6 | 44 ± 4 | 38 ± 6 | 39 ± 9 | n.s. |
| Energy (× | 8 ± 6 | 8 ± 6 | 10 ± 6 | 8 ± 6 | 7 ± 6 | n.s. |
| Entropy | 6 ± 0.3 | 6 ± 0.3 | 6 ± 0.4 | 6 ± 0.4 | 6 ± 0.4 | n.s. |
| HU mean | 200 ± 48 | 205 ± 42 | 227 ± 9 | 183 ± 60 | 168 ± 68 | n.s. |
| HU median | 206 ± 51 | 211 ± 44 | 236 ± 9 | 186 ± 60 | 169 ± 71 | n.s. |
| SD | 42 ± 12 | 45 ± 8*,** | 49 ± 14°,°° | 34 ± 9*,° | 29 ± 6**,°° | 0.01*; |
| MAD | 29 ± 8 | 31 ± 6*,** | 34 ± 11°,°° | 23 ± 6 *,° | 20 ± 3**,°° | 0.02*; |
Data are mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. Statistically significant diferences are indicated by symbols near to each variable; the relative p value is reported in the last column and labeled with the same symbol
n.s. no statistically significant difference
Correlation between ECV, LIE texture features, clinical, functional, and volumetric parameters from cCT and echocardiography
| ECV | Energy | Entropy | HU mean | HU median | SD | MAD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, year | rho = 0.3748 | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. |
| BMI | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. |
| ICD | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. |
| Heart rate | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. |
| ECG-gating mode | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. |
| EF, % | rho = − 0.3335 | n.s. | n.s. | rho = − 0.4112 | rho = − 0.4703 | rho = − 0.3943 | rho = − 0.3889 |
| EDD, mm | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | rho = 0.3490 | rho = 0.4190 | rho = 0.3830 | rho = 0.3489 |
| EDV, ml | rho = 0.3776 | n.s. | n.s. | rho = 0.3183 | rho = 0.3678 | rho = 0.3490 | rho = 0.3108 |
| Diastolic function | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | rho = 0.3837 | rho = 0.3330 |
| LAV, ml | rho = 0.3120 | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | rho = 0.4344 | rho = 0.3575 |
Diastolic function is scored in a 4-point scale (0: normal pattern, 1: impaired myocardial relaxation, 2: pseudo-normalized pattern, 3: restrictive pattern)
BMI Body Mass Index, ICD implantable cardioventer defibrillator, EF ejection fraction, EDD left ventricular end diastolic diameter, EDV left ventricular end diastolic volume, LAV left atrium volume, n.s. no statistically significant correlation
Fig. 1Color-coded HU magnitude maps of Late Iodine Enhancement (LIE) images, overlapped with the angiographic scan, are reported for one patient of each group. Reported maps allow to visually assess the higher heterogeneity of the non-scarred myocardium in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM) patients, rather than in those with post-myocarditis syndrome (MYO) and idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (IVT). The respective histograms showed a wider dispersion of HU value, suggesting higher heterogeneity in both ICM and IDCM patients rather than in the patients with MYO and IVT, regardless of the similar volumes and function of left ventricle (LV).
Fig. 2Single-patient scatter plots of a extra-cellular volume fraction (ECV), b standard deviation (SD), and c mean absolute deviation (MAD) texture features. ECV was not significantly different among groups. SD and MAD were significantly higher in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM) patients compared with both patients with post-myocarditis syndrome (MYO) and idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (IVT).
Fig. 3Bar plots of prevalence of each type of heart disease according to a ECV, b SD, and c MAD values categorized in tertile of their distribution. Numerical values indicating the first and second tertiles of each parameter are reported in round brackets. Distribution of heart disease was significantly different for SD (p = 0.0168) and MAD (p = 0.0070), while it was not significantly different for ECV (p = 1.000). ECV values were comparable among classes. SD and MAD showed significantly lower values (mainly G first tertile of their distribution) in MYO and IVT patients. p value was adjusted according to the Bonferroni correction. ICM ischemic cardiomyopathy, IDCM idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, MYO post-myocarditis syndrome, IVT idiopathic ventricular tachycardia.