Christoph Langer1, M Both, H Harders, M Lutz, M Eden, C Kühl, B Sattler, O Jansen, P Schaefer, N Frey. 1. Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Schittenhelmstr. 12, 24105, Kiel, Germany, christoph.langer@uksh.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Late enhancement (LE) multi-slice computed tomography (leMDCT) was introduced for the visualization of (intra-) myocardial fibrosis in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM). LE is associated with adverse cardiac events. This analysis focuses on leMDCT derived LV muscle mass (LV-MM) which may be related to LE resulting in LE proportion for potential risk stratification in HCM. METHODS: N=26 HCM-patients underwent leMDCT (64-slice-CT) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). In leMDCT iodine contrast (Iopromid, 350 mg/mL; 150mL) was injected 7 minutes before imaging. Reconstructed short cardiac axis views served for planimetry. The study group was divided into three groups of varying LV-contrast. LeMDCT was correlated with CMR. RESULTS: The mean age was 64.2 ± 14 years. The groups of varying contrast differed in weight and body mass index (p < 0.05). In the group with good LV-contrast assessment of LV-MM resulted in 147.4 ± 64.8 g in leMDCT vs. 147.1 ± 65.9 in CMR (p > 0.05). In the group with sufficient contrast LV-MM appeared with 172 ± 30.8 g in leMDCT vs. 165.9 ± 37.8 in CMR (p > 0.05). Overall intra-/inter-observer variability of semiautomatic assessment of LV-MM showed an accuracy of 0.9 ± 8.6 g and 0.8 ± 9.2 g in leMDCT. All leMDCT-measures correlated well with CMR (r > 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: LeMDCT primarily performed for LE-visualization in HCM allows for accurate LV-volumetry including LV-MM in > 90% of the cases. KEY POINTS: • LeMDCT of relatively low contrast allows for LV planimetry in HCM. • The correlation of leMDCT-based LV volumetry with gold-standard CMR was excellent (r > 0.9). • LeMDCT requires approximately 2.0mL/kgBW of dye to achieve acceptable contrast.
OBJECTIVES: Late enhancement (LE) multi-slice computed tomography (leMDCT) was introduced for the visualization of (intra-) myocardial fibrosis in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM). LE is associated with adverse cardiac events. This analysis focuses on leMDCT derived LV muscle mass (LV-MM) which may be related to LE resulting in LE proportion for potential risk stratification in HCM. METHODS: N=26 HCM-patients underwent leMDCT (64-slice-CT) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). In leMDCTiodine contrast (Iopromid, 350 mg/mL; 150mL) was injected 7 minutes before imaging. Reconstructed short cardiac axis views served for planimetry. The study group was divided into three groups of varying LV-contrast. LeMDCT was correlated with CMR. RESULTS: The mean age was 64.2 ± 14 years. The groups of varying contrast differed in weight and body mass index (p < 0.05). In the group with good LV-contrast assessment of LV-MM resulted in 147.4 ± 64.8 g in leMDCT vs. 147.1 ± 65.9 in CMR (p > 0.05). In the group with sufficient contrast LV-MM appeared with 172 ± 30.8 g in leMDCT vs. 165.9 ± 37.8 in CMR (p > 0.05). Overall intra-/inter-observer variability of semiautomatic assessment of LV-MM showed an accuracy of 0.9 ± 8.6 g and 0.8 ± 9.2 g in leMDCT. All leMDCT-measures correlated well with CMR (r > 0.9). CONCLUSIONS:LeMDCT primarily performed for LE-visualization in HCM allows for accurate LV-volumetry including LV-MM in > 90% of the cases. KEY POINTS: • LeMDCT of relatively low contrast allows for LV planimetry in HCM. • The correlation of leMDCT-based LV volumetry with gold-standard CMR was excellent (r > 0.9). • LeMDCT requires approximately 2.0mL/kgBW of dye to achieve acceptable contrast.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Waren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Bernard J Gersh; Barry J Maron; Robert O Bonow; Joseph A Dearani; Michael A Fifer; Mark S Link; Srihari S Naidu; Rick A Nishimura; Steve R Ommen; Harry Rakowski; Christine E Seidman; Jeffrey A Towbin; James E Udelson; Clyde W Yancy Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Wessel P Brouwer; Tjeerd Germans; Maaike C Head; Jolanda van der Velden; Martijn W Heymans; Imke Christiaans; Arjan C Houweling; Arthur A Wilde; Albert C van Rossum Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Albert C Lardo; Marco A S Cordeiro; Caterina Silva; Luciano C Amado; Richard T George; Anastasios P Saliaris; Karl H Schuleri; Veronica R Fernandes; Menekhem Zviman; Saman Nazarian; Henry R Halperin; Katherine C Wu; Joshua M Hare; Joao A C Lima Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-01-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Andre D Furtado; Marcus Carlsson; Max Wintermark; Karen Ordovas; Maythem Saeed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging Date: 2008 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Jeanette Schulz-Menger; David A Bluemke; Jens Bremerich; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Raymond J Kim; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Christopher M Kramer; Dudley J Pennell; Sven Plein; Eike Nagel Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Antonio Esposito; Anna Palmisano; Sofia Antunes; Caterina Colantoni; Paola Maria Vittoria Rancoita; Davide Vignale; Francesca Baratto; Paolo Della Bella; Alessandro Del Maschio; Francesco De Cobelli Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 3.488