OBJECTIVES: We sought to establish the prognostic value of a comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) examination in risk stratification of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients. BACKGROUND: With annual mortality rates ranging between 1% and 5%, depending on patient selection, a small but significant number of HCM patients are at risk for an adverse event. Therefore, the identification of and prophylactic therapy (i.e., defibrillator placement) in patients with HCM who are at risk of dying are imperative. METHODS: Two-hundred forty-three consecutive patients with HCM were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent initial CMR, and 220 were available for clinical follow-up. The mean follow-up time was 1,090 days after CMR. End points were all-cause and cardiac mortality. RESULTS: During follow-up 20 of the 220 patients died, and 2 patients survived sudden cardiac death due to adequate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharge. Most events (n = 16) occurred for cardiac reasons; the remaining 6 events were related to cancer and accidents. Our data indicate that the presence of scar visualized by CMR yields an odds ratio of 5.47 for all-cause mortality and of 8.01 for cardiac mortality. This might be superior to classic clinical risk factors, because in our dataset the presence of 2 risk factors yields an odds ratio of 3.86 for all-cause and of 2.20 for cardiac mortality, respectively. Multivariable analysis also revealed the presence of late gadolinium enhancement as a good independent predictor of death in HCM patients. CONCLUSIONS: Among our population of largely low or asymptomatic HCM patients, the presence of scar indicated by CMR is a good independent predictor of all-cause and cardiac mortality.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to establish the prognostic value of a comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) examination in risk stratification of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients. BACKGROUND: With annual mortality rates ranging between 1% and 5%, depending on patient selection, a small but significant number of HCM patients are at risk for an adverse event. Therefore, the identification of and prophylactic therapy (i.e., defibrillator placement) in patients with HCM who are at risk of dying are imperative. METHODS: Two-hundred forty-three consecutive patients with HCM were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent initial CMR, and 220 were available for clinical follow-up. The mean follow-up time was 1,090 days after CMR. End points were all-cause and cardiac mortality. RESULTS: During follow-up 20 of the 220 patients died, and 2 patients survived sudden cardiac death due to adequate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharge. Most events (n = 16) occurred for cardiac reasons; the remaining 6 events were related to cancer and accidents. Our data indicate that the presence of scar visualized by CMR yields an odds ratio of 5.47 for all-cause mortality and of 8.01 for cardiac mortality. This might be superior to classic clinical risk factors, because in our dataset the presence of 2 risk factors yields an odds ratio of 3.86 for all-cause and of 2.20 for cardiac mortality, respectively. Multivariable analysis also revealed the presence of late gadolinium enhancement as a good independent predictor of death in HCM patients. CONCLUSIONS: Among our population of largely low or asymptomatic HCM patients, the presence of scar indicated by CMR is a good independent predictor of all-cause and cardiac mortality.
Authors: Tomas G Neilan; Ravi V Shah; Siddique A Abbasi; Hoshang Farhad; John D Groarke; John A Dodson; Otavio Coelho-Filho; Ciaran J McMullan; Bobak Heydari; Gregory F Michaud; Roy M John; Rob van der Geest; Michael L Steigner; Ron Blankstein; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-08-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Julian G Westphal; Angelos G Rigopoulos; Constantinos Bakogiannis; Sarah E Ludwig; Sophie Mavrogeni; Boris Bigalke; Torsten Doenst; Matthias Pauschinger; Carsten Tschöpe; P Christian Schulze; Michel Noutsias Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 4.214
Authors: Christopher T Sibley; Radwa A Noureldin; Neville Gai; Marcelo Souto Nacif; Songtao Liu; Evrim B Turkbey; James O Mudd; Rob J van der Geest; João A C Lima; Marc K Halushka; David A Bluemke Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-10-22 Impact factor: 11.105