Literature DB >> 24058223

EFFECTIVELY SELECTING A TARGET POPULATION FOR A FUTURE COMPARATIVE STUDY.

Lihui Zhao1, Lu Tian, Tianxi Cai, Brian Claggett, L J Wei.   

Abstract

When comparing a new treatment with a control in a randomized clinical study, the treatment effect is generally assessed by evaluating a summary measure over a specific study population. The success of the trial heavily depends on the choice of such a population. In this paper, we show a systematic, effective way to identify a promising population, for which the new treatment is expected to have a desired benefit, utilizing the data from a current study involving similar comparator treatments. Specifically, using the existing data, we first create a parametric scoring system as a function of multiple multiple baseline covariates to estimate subject-specific treatment differences. Based on this scoring system, we specify a desired level of treatment difference and obtain a subgroup of patients, defined as those whose estimated scores exceed this threshold. An empirically calibrated threshold-specific treatment difference curve across a range of score values is constructed. The subpopulation of patients satisfying any given level of treatment benefit can then be identified accordingly. To avoid bias due to overoptimism, we utilize a cross-training-evaluation method for implementing the above two-step procedure. We then show how to select the best scoring system among all competing models. Furthermore, for cases in which only a single pre-specified working model is involved, inference procedures are proposed for the average treatment difference over a range of score values using the entire data set, and are justified theoretically and numerically. Lastly, the proposals are illustrated with the data from two clinical trials in treating HIV and cardiovascular diseases. Note that if we are not interested in designing a new study for comparing similar treatments, the new procedure can also be quite useful for the management of future patients, so that treatment may be targeted towards those who would receive nontrivial benefits to compensate for the risk or cost of the new treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross-training-evaluation; Lasso procedure; Personalized medicine; Prediction; Ridge regression; Stratified medicine; Subgroup analysis; Variable selection

Year:  2013        PMID: 24058223      PMCID: PMC3775385          DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2013.770705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  17 in total

1.  A graphical method to assess treatment-covariate interactions using the Cox model on subsets of the data.

Authors:  M Bonetti; R D Gelber
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Quantifying and comparing the predictive accuracy of continuous prognostic factors for binary outcomes.

Authors:  Chaya S Moskowitz; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?".

Authors:  Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jan 1-7       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Analysis of randomized comparative clinical trial data for personalized treatment selections.

Authors:  Tianxi Cai; Lu Tian; Peggy H Wong; L J Wei
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  The charisma of subgroups and the subgroups of CHARISMA.

Authors:  Marc A Pfeffer; John A Jarcho
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-03-12       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The standard error of an estimate of expectation of life, with special reference to expectation of tumourless life in experiments with mice.

Authors:  J O IRWIN
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1949-06

7.  Renal function and effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in patients with chronic stable coronary disease in the Prevention of Events with ACE inhibition (PEACE) trial.

Authors:  Scott D Solomon; Madeline M Rice; Kathleen A Jablonski; Powell Jose; Michael Domanski; Marc Sabatine; Bernard J Gersh; Jean Rouleau; Marc A Pfeffer; Eugene Braunwald
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  A controlled trial of two nucleoside analogues plus indinavir in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection and CD4 cell counts of 200 per cubic millimeter or less. AIDS Clinical Trials Group 320 Study Team.

Authors:  S M Hammer; K E Squires; M D Hughes; J M Grimes; L M Demeter; J S Currier; J J Eron; J E Feinberg; H H Balfour; L R Deyton; J A Chodakewitz; M A Fischl
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-09-11       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition in stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Eugene Braunwald; Michael J Domanski; Sarah E Fowler; Nancy L Geller; Bernard J Gersh; Judith Hsia; Marc A Pfeffer; Madeline M Rice; Yves D Rosenberg; Jean L Rouleau
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-11-07       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  The calibration of treatment effects from clinical trials to target populations.

Authors:  Constantine Frangakis
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.486

View more
  47 in total

Review 1.  Treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis - insights from real-world observational studies.

Authors:  Maria Trojano; Mar Tintore; Xavier Montalban; Jan Hillert; Tomas Kalincik; Pietro Iaffaldano; Tim Spelman; Maria Pia Sormani; Helmut Butzkueven
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 2.  Personalized evidence based medicine: predictive approaches to heterogeneous treatment effects.

Authors:  David M Kent; Ewout Steyerberg; David van Klaveren
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-12-10

3.  Change-Plane Analysis for Subgroup Detection and Sample Size Calculation.

Authors:  Ailin Fan; Rui Song; Wenbin Lu
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Treatment selections using risk-benefit profiles based on data from comparative randomized clinical trials with multiple endpoints.

Authors:  Brian Claggett; Lu Tian; Davide Castagno; Lee-Jen Wei
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Optimal stratification in outcome prediction using baseline information.

Authors:  Florence H Yong; Lu Tian; Sheng Yu; Tianxi Cai; L J Wei
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.445

6.  Evaluating Markers for Guiding Treatment.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker; Marco Bonetti
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Optimal treatment regimes for survival endpoints using a locally-efficient doubly-robust estimator from a classification perspective.

Authors:  Xiaofei Bai; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Wenbin Lu; Rui Song
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  A general statistical framework for subgroup identification and comparative treatment scoring.

Authors:  Shuai Chen; Lu Tian; Tianxi Cai; Menggang Yu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Statistical data presentation: a primer for rheumatology researchers.

Authors:  Durga Prasanna Misra; Olena Zimba; Armen Yuri Gasparyan
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.631

10.  Evaluating marker-guided treatment selection strategies.

Authors:  Roland A Matsouaka; Junlong Li; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.