Literature DB >> 29534239

Multivariate Pattern Analysis of Genotype-Phenotype Relationships in Schizophrenia.

Amanda B Zheutlin1, Adam M Chekroud1,2,3, Renato Polimanti3, Joel Gelernter3, Fred W Sabb4, Robert M Bilder5, Nelson Freimer6, Edythe D London6, Christina M Hultman7, Tyrone D Cannon1,3.   

Abstract

Genetic risk variants for schizophrenia have been linked to many related clinical and biological phenotypes with the hopes of delineating how individual variation across thousands of variants corresponds to the clinical and etiologic heterogeneity within schizophrenia. This has primarily been done using risk score profiling, which aggregates effects across all variants into a single predictor. While effective, this method lacks flexibility in certain domains: risk scores cannot capture nonlinear effects and do not employ any variable selection. We used random forest, an algorithm with this flexibility designed to maximize predictive power, to predict 6 cognitive endophenotypes in a combined sample of psychiatric patients and controls (N = 739) using 77 genetic variants strongly associated with schizophrenia. Tenfold cross-validation was applied to the discovery sample and models were externally validated in an independent sample of similar ancestry (N = 336). Linear approaches, including linear regression and task-specific polygenic risk scores, were employed for comparison. Random forest models for processing speed (P = .019) and visual memory (P = .036) and risk scores developed for verbal (P = .042) and working memory (P = .037) successfully generalized to an independent sample with similar predictive strength and error. As such, we suggest that both methods may be useful for mapping a limited set of predetermined, disease-associated SNPs to related phenotypes. Incorporating random forest and other more flexible algorithms into genotype-phenotype mapping inquiries could contribute to parsing heterogeneity within schizophrenia; such algorithms can perform as well as standard methods and can capture a more comprehensive set of potential relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29534239      PMCID: PMC6101611          DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sby005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Bull        ISSN: 0586-7614            Impact factor:   9.306


  39 in total

1.  The mystery of missing heritability: Genetic interactions create phantom heritability.

Authors:  Or Zuk; Eliana Hechter; Shamil R Sunyaev; Eric S Lander
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A linear complexity phasing method for thousands of genomes.

Authors:  Olivier Delaneau; Jonathan Marchini; Jean-François Zagury
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  SNAP: a web-based tool for identification and annotation of proxy SNPs using HapMap.

Authors:  Andrew D Johnson; Robert E Handsaker; Sara L Pulit; Marcia M Nizzari; Christopher J O'Donnell; Paul I W de Bakker
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  An application of Random Forests to a genome-wide association dataset: methodological considerations & new findings.

Authors:  Benjamin A Goldstein; Alan E Hubbard; Adele Cutler; Lisa F Barcellos
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 2.797

5.  Variability in working memory performance explained by epistasis vs polygenic scores in the ZNF804A pathway.

Authors:  Kristin K Nicodemus; April Hargreaves; Derek Morris; Richard Anney; Michael Gill; Aiden Corvin; Gary Donohoe
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 21.596

6.  Statistical epistasis and progressive brain change in schizophrenia: an approach for examining the relationships between multiple genes.

Authors:  N C Andreasen; M A Wilcox; B-C Ho; E Epping; S Ziebell; E Zeien; B Weiss; T Wassink
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 15.992

7.  Genetic contributions to variation in general cognitive function: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies in the CHARGE consortium (N=53949).

Authors:  G Davies; N Armstrong; J C Bis; J Bressler; V Chouraki; S Giddaluru; E Hofer; C A Ibrahim-Verbaas; M Kirin; J Lahti; S J van der Lee; S Le Hellard; T Liu; R E Marioni; C Oldmeadow; I Postmus; A V Smith; J A Smith; A Thalamuthu; R Thomson; V Vitart; J Wang; L Yu; L Zgaga; W Zhao; R Boxall; S E Harris; W D Hill; D C Liewald; M Luciano; H Adams; D Ames; N Amin; P Amouyel; A A Assareh; R Au; J T Becker; A Beiser; C Berr; L Bertram; E Boerwinkle; B M Buckley; H Campbell; J Corley; P L De Jager; C Dufouil; J G Eriksson; T Espeseth; J D Faul; I Ford; R F Gottesman; M E Griswold; V Gudnason; T B Harris; G Heiss; A Hofman; E G Holliday; J Huffman; S L R Kardia; N Kochan; D S Knopman; J B Kwok; J-C Lambert; T Lee; G Li; S-C Li; M Loitfelder; O L Lopez; A J Lundervold; A Lundqvist; K A Mather; S S Mirza; L Nyberg; B A Oostra; A Palotie; G Papenberg; A Pattie; K Petrovic; O Polasek; B M Psaty; P Redmond; S Reppermund; J I Rotter; H Schmidt; M Schuur; P W Schofield; R J Scott; V M Steen; D J Stott; J C van Swieten; K D Taylor; J Trollor; S Trompet; A G Uitterlinden; G Weinstein; E Widen; B G Windham; J W Jukema; A F Wright; M J Wright; Q Yang; H Amieva; J R Attia; D A Bennett; H Brodaty; A J M de Craen; C Hayward; M A Ikram; U Lindenberger; L-G Nilsson; D J Porteous; K Räikkönen; I Reinvang; I Rudan; P S Sachdev; R Schmidt; P R Schofield; V Srikanth; J M Starr; S T Turner; D R Weir; J F Wilson; C van Duijn; L Launer; A L Fitzpatrick; S Seshadri; T H Mosley; I J Deary
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 15.992

8.  Building a genetic risk model for bipolar disorder from genome-wide association data with random forest algorithm.

Authors:  Li-Chung Chuang; Po-Hsiu Kuo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes.

Authors:  Goncalo R Abecasis; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Mark A DePristo; Richard M Durbin; Robert E Handsaker; Hyun Min Kang; Gabor T Marth; Gil A McVean
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Dual-process theory, conflict processing, and delusional belief.

Authors:  Michael V Bronstein; Gordon Pennycook; Jutta Joormann; Philip R Corlett; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-06-12

2.  Will Machine Learning Enable Us to Finally Cut the Gordian Knot of Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Neeraj Tandon; Rajiv Tandon
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Predicting Barriers to Treatment for Depression in a U.S. National Sample: A Cross-Sectional, Proof-of-Concept Study.

Authors:  Adam M Chekroud; David Foster; Amanda B Zheutlin; Danielle M Gerhard; Brita Roy; Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Abhishek Chandra; Michelle Degli Esposti; Girish Subramanyan; Ralitza Gueorguieva; Martin Paulus; John H Krystal
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Machine learning for genetic prediction of psychiatric disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew Bracher-Smith; Karen Crawford; Valentina Escott-Price
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 15.992

Review 5.  Polygenic risk scores in psychiatry: Will they be useful for clinicians?

Authors:  Janice M Fullerton; John I Nurnberger
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-07-31

6.  Predicting rehospitalization within 2 years of initial patient admission for a major depressive episode: a multimodal machine learning approach.

Authors:  Micah Cearns; Nils Opel; Scott Clark; Claas Kaehler; Anbupalam Thalamuthu; Walter Heindel; Theresa Winter; Henning Teismann; Heike Minnerup; Udo Dannlowski; Klaus Berger; Bernhard T Baune
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 6.222

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.