Literature DB >> 31226640

Dual-process theory, conflict processing, and delusional belief.

Michael V Bronstein1, Gordon Pennycook2, Jutta Joormann3, Philip R Corlett4, Tyrone D Cannon5.   

Abstract

Many reasoning biases that may contribute to delusion formation and/or maintenance are common in healthy individuals. Research indicating that reasoning in the general population proceeds via analytic processes (which depend upon working memory and support hypothetical thought) and intuitive processes (which are autonomous and independent of working memory) may therefore help uncover the source of these biases. Consistent with this possibility, recent studies imply that impaired conflict processing might reduce engagement in analytic reasoning, thereby producing reasoning biases and promoting delusions in individuals with schizophrenia. Progress toward understanding this potential pathway to delusions is currently impeded by ambiguity about whether any of these deficits or biases is necessary or sufficient for the formation and maintenance of delusions. Resolving this ambiguity requires consideration of whether particular cognitive deficits or biases in this putative pathway have causal primacy over other processes that may also participate in the causation of delusions. Accordingly, the present manuscript critically evaluates whether impaired conflict processing is the primary initiating deficit in the generation of reasoning biases that may promote the development and/or maintenance of delusions. Suggestions for future research that may elucidate mechanistic pathways by which reasoning deficits might engender and maintain delusions are subsequently offered.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conflict detection; Delusions; Dual stream modulation failure; Dual-process theory; Reasoning bias

Year:  2019        PMID: 31226640      PMCID: PMC6947658          DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0272-7358


  98 in total

1.  How conscious experience and working memory interact.

Authors:  Bernard J. Baars; Stan Franklin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Working-memory capacity protects model-based learning from stress.

Authors:  A Ross Otto; Candace M Raio; Alice Chiang; Elizabeth A Phelps; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Levels of conflict in reasoning modulate right lateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Melanie Stollstorff; Oshin Vartanian; Vinod Goel
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Intuition, reason, and metacognition.

Authors:  Valerie A Thompson; Jamie A Prowse Turner; Gordon Pennycook
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Disrupted resting-state functional connectivity in minimally treated chronic schizophrenia.

Authors:  Xijin Wang; Mingrui Xia; Yunyao Lai; Zhengjia Dai; Qingjiu Cao; Zhang Cheng; Xue Han; Lei Yang; Yanbo Yuan; Yong Zhang; Keqing Li; Hong Ma; Chuan Shi; Nan Hong; Philip Szeszko; Xin Yu; Yong He
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Data gathering: biased in psychosis?

Authors:  Frank Van Dael; Dagmar Versmissen; Ilse Janssen; Inez Myin-Germeys; Jim van Os; Lydia Krabbendam
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Combined neurocognitive and metacognitive rehabilitation in schizophrenia: Effects on bias against disconfirmatory evidence.

Authors:  M Buonocore; M Bosia; R Riccaboni; M Bechi; M Spangaro; M Piantanida; F Cocchi; C Guglielmino; L Bianchi; E Smeraldi; R Cavallaro
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 5.361

Review 8.  Holding on to false beliefs: The bias against disconfirmatory evidence over the course of psychosis.

Authors:  Sarah Eisenacher; Mathias Zink
Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry       Date:  2016-08-30

Review 9.  Neuregulin 1 in neural development, synaptic plasticity and schizophrenia.

Authors:  Lin Mei; Wen-Cheng Xiong
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Delusion formation and reasoning biases in those at clinical high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  M R Broome; L C Johns; I Valli; J B Woolley; P Tabraham; C Brett; L Valmaggia; E Peters; P A Garety; P K McGuire
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry Suppl       Date:  2007-12
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  A review of risky decision-making in psychosis-spectrum disorders.

Authors:  John R Purcell; Emma N Herms; Jaime Morales; William P Hetrick; Krista M Wisner; Joshua W Brown
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2021-12-20

2.  Association Between Failures in Perceptual Updating and the Severity of Psychosis in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Sonia Bansal; Gi-Yeul Bae; Benjamin M Robinson; Britta Hahn; James Waltz; Molly Erickson; Pantelis Leptourgos; Phillip Corlett; Steven J Luck; James M Gold
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 21.596

3.  A Neural Circuit for Spirituality and Religiosity Derived From Patients With Brain Lesions.

Authors:  Michael A Ferguson; Frederic L W V J Schaper; Alexander Cohen; Shan Siddiqi; Sarah M Merrill; Jared A Nielsen; Jordan Grafman; Cosimo Urgesi; Franco Fabbro; Michael D Fox
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Education alone is insufficient to combat online medical misinformation.

Authors:  Michael V Bronstein; Sophia Vinogradov
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 5.  Derationalizing Delusions.

Authors:  Vaughan Bell; Nichola Raihani; Sam Wilkinson
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-11-20

6.  Is intuition allied with jumping to conclusions in decision-making? An intensive longitudinal study in patients with delusions and in non-clinical individuals.

Authors:  Thea Zander-Schellenberg; Sarah A K Kuhn; Julian Möller; Andrea H Meyer; Christian Huber; Roselind Lieb; Christina Andreou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Willingness to vaccinate against SARS-CoV-2: The role of reasoning biases and conspiracist ideation.

Authors:  Michael V Bronstein; Erich Kummerfeld; Angus MacDonald; Sophia Vinogradov
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 3.641

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.