Literature DB >> 32591634

Machine learning for genetic prediction of psychiatric disorders: a systematic review.

Matthew Bracher-Smith1, Karen Crawford1,2, Valentina Escott-Price3,4.   

Abstract

Machine learning methods have been employed to make predictions in psychiatry from genotypes, with the potential to bring improved prediction of outcomes in psychiatric genetics; however, their current performance is unclear. We aim to systematically review machine learning methods for predicting psychiatric disorders from genetics alone and evaluate their discrimination, bias and implementation. Medline, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Scopus were searched for terms relating to genetics, psychiatric disorders and machine learning, including neural networks, random forests, support vector machines and boosting, on 10 September 2019. Following PRISMA guidelines, articles were screened for inclusion independently by two authors, extracted, and assessed for risk of bias. Overall, 63 full texts were assessed from a pool of 652 abstracts. Data were extracted for 77 models of schizophrenia, bipolar, autism or anorexia across 13 studies. Performance of machine learning methods was highly varied (0.48-0.95 AUC) and differed between schizophrenia (0.54-0.95 AUC), bipolar (0.48-0.65 AUC), autism (0.52-0.81 AUC) and anorexia (0.62-0.69 AUC). This is likely due to the high risk of bias identified in the study designs and analysis for reported results. Choices for predictor selection, hyperparameter search and validation methodology, and viewing of the test set during training were common causes of high risk of bias in analysis. Key steps in model development and validation were frequently not performed or unreported. Comparison of discrimination across studies was constrained by heterogeneity of predictors, outcome and measurement, in addition to sample overlap within and across studies. Given widespread high risk of bias and the small number of studies identified, it is important to ensure established analysis methods are adopted. We emphasise best practices in methodology and reporting for improving future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32591634      PMCID: PMC7610853          DOI: 10.1038/s41380-020-0825-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Psychiatry        ISSN: 1359-4184            Impact factor:   15.992


  57 in total

1.  A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models.

Authors:  Evangelia Christodoulou; Jie Ma; Gary S Collins; Ewout W Steyerberg; Jan Y Verbakel; Ben Van Calster
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Will Machine Learning Enable Us to Finally Cut the Gordian Knot of Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Neeraj Tandon; Rajiv Tandon
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 3.  The impact of machine learning techniques in the study of bipolar disorder: A systematic review.

Authors:  Diego Librenza-Garcia; Bruno Jaskulski Kotzian; Jessica Yang; Benson Mwangi; Bo Cao; Luiza Nunes Pereira Lima; Mariane Bagatin Bermudez; Manuela Vianna Boeira; Flávio Kapczinski; Ives Cavalcante Passos
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Computational Psychiatry and the Challenge of Schizophrenia.

Authors:  John H Krystal; John D Murray; Adam M Chekroud; Philip R Corlett; Genevieve Yang; Xiao-Jing Wang; Alan Anticevic
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 5.  Random forests for genomic data analysis.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Hemant Ishwaran
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 5.736

Review 6.  Detecting gene-gene interactions that underlie human diseases.

Authors:  Heather J Cordell
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Improving individual predictions: Machine learning approaches for detecting and attacking heterogeneity in schizophrenia (and other psychiatric diseases).

Authors:  Hugo G Schnack
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Regularized machine learning in the genetic prediction of complex traits.

Authors:  Sebastian Okser; Tapio Pahikkala; Antti Airola; Tapio Salakoski; Samuli Ripatti; Tero Aittokallio
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 9.  Machine learning, statistical learning and the future of biological research in psychiatry.

Authors:  R Iniesta; D Stahl; P McGuffin
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 7.723

10.  Genetic variants and their interactions in disease risk prediction - machine learning and network perspectives.

Authors:  Sebastian Okser; Tapio Pahikkala; Tero Aittokallio
Journal:  BioData Min       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.522

View more
  17 in total

1.  Perspective on Beyond Statistical Significance: Finding Meaningful Effects.

Authors:  Howard J Edenberg
Journal:  Complex Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-20

Review 2.  The performance of artificial intelligence-driven technologies in diagnosing mental disorders: an umbrella review.

Authors:  Alaa Abd-Alrazaq; Dari Alhuwail; Jens Schneider; Carla T Toro; Arfan Ahmed; Mahmood Alzubaidi; Mohannad Alajlani; Mowafa Househ
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-07-07

3.  Ancestry may confound genetic machine learning: Candidate-gene prediction of opioid use disorder as an example.

Authors:  Alexander S Hatoum; Frank R Wendt; Marco Galimberti; Renato Polimanti; Benjamin Neale; Henry R Kranzler; Joel Gelernter; Howard J Edenberg; Arpana Agrawal
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 4.852

4.  From genetics to systems biology of stress-related mental disorders.

Authors:  Shareefa Dalvie; Chris Chatzinakos; Obada Al Zoubi; Foivos Georgiadis; Lee Lancashire; Nikolaos P Daskalakis
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2021-09-12

Review 5.  Artificial Intelligence for Mental Health Care: Clinical Applications, Barriers, Facilitators, and Artificial Wisdom.

Authors:  Ellen E Lee; John Torous; Munmun De Choudhury; Colin A Depp; Sarah A Graham; Ho-Cheol Kim; Martin P Paulus; John H Krystal; Dilip V Jeste
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2021-02-08

6.  Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning for clinical outcome prediction.

Authors:  Rowland W Pettit; Robert Fullem; Chao Cheng; Christopher I Amos
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2021-12-20

7.  Genetic variations analysis for complex brain disease diagnosis using machine learning techniques: opportunities and hurdles.

Authors:  Hala Ahmed; Louai Alarabi; Shaker El-Sappagh; Hassan Soliman; Mohammed Elmogy
Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci       Date:  2021-09-20

Review 8.  Machine learning for the life-time risk prediction of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas W Rowe; Ioanna K Katzourou; Joshua O Stevenson-Hoare; Matthew R Bracher-Smith; Dobril K Ivanov; Valentina Escott-Price
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2021-10-21

9.  Machine learning methods applied to genotyping data capture interactions between single nucleotide variants in late onset Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Magdalena Arnal Segura; Giorgio Bini; Dietmar Fernandez Orth; Eleftherios Samaras; Maya Kassis; Fotis Aisopos; Jordi Rambla De Argila; George Paliouras; Peter Garrard; Claudia Giambartolomei; Gian Gaetano Tartaglia
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2022-04-05

10.  Can minimal clinically important differences in patient reported outcome measures be predicted by machine learning in patients with total knee or hip arthroplasty? A systematic review.

Authors:  Benedikt Langenberger; Andreas Thoma; Verena Vogt
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.