Literature DB >> 29532263

Adding a speed-accuracy trade-off to discrete-state models: A comment on Heck and Erdfelder (2016).

Jeffrey J Starns1.   

Abstract

Heck and Erdfelder (2016) developed a model that extends discrete-state multinomial processing tree models to response time (RT) data. Their model is an important advance, but it does not have a mechanism to produce the speed-accuracy trade-off, the bedrock empirical observation that rushed decisions are less accurate. I present a similar model, the "discrete-race" model, with a simple mechanism for the speed-accuracy trade-off. In the model, information that supports detection of the stimulus type is available for some proportion of items and unavailable for others. Both the amount of time needed for detection to succeed and the amount of time that the decision maker waits before guessing are variable from trial to trial. Responses are based on detection when it is available and has a finishing time before the guess time for that trial. In other words, the decision maker sometimes loses opportunities to respond correctly on the basis of detection by first making a guess. These lost opportunities are more common when the guess-time distribution tends to have low wait times, which decreases accuracy. I report simulations showing that the model can accurately recover parameter values and is strongly constrained by the speed-accuracy trade-offs across conditions with different levels of response caution.

Keywords:  Discrete-state models; Recognition memory; Response time (RT) models

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29532263     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1456-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  20 in total

1.  Time-dependent Poisson counter models of response latency in simple judgment.

Authors:  P L Smith; T Van Zandt
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Francis Tuerlinckx
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

3.  Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling.

Authors:  W H Batchelder; D M Riefer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

4.  Differentiation and response bias in episodic memory: evidence from reaction time distributions.

Authors:  Amy H Criss
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The two recollections.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; C F A Gomes; R Moran
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Linking process and measurement models of recognition-based decisions.

Authors:  Daniel W Heck; Edgar Erdfelder
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Evidence for discrete-state processing in recognition memory.

Authors:  Jordan M Province; Jeffrey N Rouder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Recognition memory models and binary-response ROCs: a comparison by minimum description length.

Authors:  David Kellen; Karl Christoph Klauer; Arndt Bröder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

9.  Discrete-slots models of visual working-memory response times.

Authors:  Christopher Donkin; Robert M Nosofsky; Jason M Gold; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Jeffrey J Starns
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  1 in total

1.  Adding a speed-accuracy trade-off to discrete-state models: A comment on Heck and Erdfelder (2016).

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.