Literature DB >> 11109709

Time-dependent Poisson counter models of response latency in simple judgment.

P L Smith1, T Van Zandt.   

Abstract

An important class of sequential-sampling models for response time (RT) assumes that evidence for competing response alternatives accrues in parallel and that a response is made when the evidence total for a particular response exceeds a criterion. One member of this class of models is the Poisson counter model, in which evidence accrues in unit increments and the waiting time between increments is exponentially distributed. This paper generalizes the counter model to allow the Poisson event rate to vary with time. General expressions are obtained for the RT distributions for the two- and the m-alternative cases. Closed-form expressions are obtained for response probabilities under a proportional-rates assumption and for mean RT under conditions in which the integrated event rate increases as an arbitrary power of time. An application in the area of early vision is described, in which the Poisson event rates are proportional to the outputs of sustained and transient channels.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11109709     DOI: 10.1348/000711000159349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1102            Impact factor:   3.380


  18 in total

1.  A comparison of two response time models applied to perceptual matching.

Authors:  T Van Zandt; H Colonius; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-06

2.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Francis Tuerlinckx
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

3.  Nice Guys Finish Fast and Bad Guys Finish Last: Facilitatory vs. Inhibitory Interaction in Parallel Systems.

Authors:  Ami Eidels; Joseph W Houpt; Nicholas Altieri; Lei Pei; James T Townsend
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.223

4.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Dual diffusion model for single-cell recording data from the superior colliculus in a brightness-discrimination task.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Yukako T Hasegawa; Ryohei P Hasegawa; Philip L Smith; Mark A Segraves
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Studying visual search using systems factorial methodology with target-distractor similarity as the factor.

Authors:  Mario Fifić; James T Townsend; Ami Eidels
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-05

7.  A diffusion model explanation of the worst performance rule for reaction time and IQ.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Florian Schmiedek; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Intelligence       Date:  2008

8.  The overconstraint of response time models: rethinking the scaling problem.

Authors:  Chris Donkin; Scott D Brown; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12

Review 9.  Workload capacity spaces: a unified methodology for response time measures of efficiency as workload is varied.

Authors:  James T Townsend; Ami Eidels
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

10.  A Race Model for Responses and Response Times in Tests.

Authors:  Jochen Ranger; Jörg-Tobias Kuhn; José-Luis Gaviria
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.