Literature DB >> 29532229

County socioeconomic characteristics and pediatric renal transplantation outcomes.

Rebecca Miller1, Clifford Akateh2, Noelle Thompson3, Dmitry Tumin4,5, Don Hayes6,7, Sylvester M Black2, Joseph D Tobias4,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Existing risk adjustment models for solid organ transplantation omit socioeconomic status (SES). With limited data available on transplant candidates' SES, linkage of transplant outcomes data to geographic SES measures has been proposed. We investigate the utility of county SES for understanding differences in pediatric kidney transplantation (KTx) outcomes.
METHODS: We identified patients < 18 years of age receiving first-time KTx using United Network for Organ Sharing registry data in two eras: 2006-2010 and 2011-2015, corresponding to periods of county SES data collection. In each era, counties were ranked by 1-year rates of survival with intact graft, and by county SES score. We used Spearman correlation (ρ) to evaluate the association between county rankings on SES and transplant outcomes in each era and consistency between these measures across eras. We also evaluated the utility of county SES for improving prediction of individual KTx outcomes.
RESULTS: The analysis included 2972 children and 108 counties. County SES and transplant outcomes were not correlated in either 2006-2010 (ρ = 0.06; p = 0.525) or 2011-2015 (ρ = 0.162, p = 0.093). County SES rankings were strongly correlated between eras (ρ = 0.99, p < 0.001), whereas county rankings of transplant outcomes were not correlated between eras (ρ = 0.16, p = 0.097). Including county SES quintile in individual-level models of transplant outcomes did not improve model predictive utility.
CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric kidney transplant outcomes are unstable from period to period at the county level and are not correlated with county-level SES. Appropriate adjustment for SES disparities in transplant outcomes could require further collection of detailed individual SES data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kidney transplant; Socioeconomic status; Transplant outcomes; UNOS; United Network for Organ Sharing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29532229      PMCID: PMC6425941          DOI: 10.1007/s00467-018-3928-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol        ISSN: 0931-041X            Impact factor:   3.714


  37 in total

1.  Racial disparities in access to renal transplantation--clinically appropriate or due to underuse or overuse?

Authors:  A M Epstein; J Z Ayanian; J H Keogh; S J Noonan; N Armistead; P D Cleary; J S Weissman; J A David-Kasdan; D Carlson; J Fuller; D Marsh; R M Conti
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-23       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Access to care, health status, and health disparities in the United States and Canada: results of a cross-national population-based survey.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; David U Himmelstein; Steffie Woolhandler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Influence of socioeconomic status on allograft and patient survival following kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Frank L Ward; Patrick O'Kelly; Fionnuala Donohue; Coilin ÓhAiseadha; Trutz Haase; Jonathan Pratschke; Declan G deFreitas; Howard Johnson; Peter J Conlon; Conall M O'Seaghdha
Journal:  Nephrology (Carlton)       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Implications of expanded medicaid eligibility for patient outcomes after liver transplantation: Caveat emptor.

Authors:  Barry Schlansky; Carmel Shachar
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.799

5.  Neighborhood level effects of socioeconomic status on liver transplant selection and recipient survival.

Authors:  R Cutler Quillin; Gregory C Wilson; Koffi Wima; Samuel F Hohmann; Jeffrey M Sutton; Joshua J Shaw; Ian M Paquette; E Steve Woodle; Daniel E Abbott; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  Association of race and socioeconomic position with outcomes in pediatric heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  T P Singh; D C Naftel; L Addonizio; W Mahle; M T Foushee; S Zangwill; E D Blume; J K Kirklin; R Singh; J K Johnston; R Chinnock
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  OPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual Data Report: Kidney.

Authors:  A Hart; J M Smith; M A Skeans; S K Gustafson; D E Stewart; W S Cherikh; J L Wainright; A Kucheryavaya; M Woodbury; J J Snyder; B L Kasiske; A K Israni
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Impact of socioeconomic factors on outcome of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert L Barrack; Erin L Ruh; Jiajing Chen; Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Javad Parvizi; Craig J Della Valle; William G Hamilton; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Neighborhood poverty and racial disparities in kidney transplant waitlisting.

Authors:  Rachel E Patzer; Sandra Amaral; Haimanot Wasse; Nataliya Volkova; David Kleinbaum; William M McClellan
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 10.121

10.  County socioeconomic characteristics and heart transplant outcomes in the United States.

Authors:  Dmitry Tumin; Jessica Horan; Emily A Shrider; Sakima A Smith; Joseph D Tobias; Don Hayes; Randi E Foraker
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  5 in total

1.  County Rankings Have Limited Utility When Predicting Liver Transplant Outcomes.

Authors:  Clifford Akateh; Rebecca Miller; Eliza W Beal; Dmitry Tumin; Joseph D Tobias; Don Hayes; Sylvester M Black
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  The unfinished journey toward transplant equity: an analysis of racial/ethnic disparities for children after the implementation of the Kidney Allocation System in 2014.

Authors:  Olga Charnaya; Laura Zeiser; Dolev Yisar; Aviva Goldberg; Dorry L Segev; Allan Massie; Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang; Priya Verghese
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.651

3.  Are Income-based Differences in TKA Use and Outcomes Reduced in a Single-payer System? A Large-database Comparison of the United States and Canada.

Authors:  Bella Mehta; Kaylee Ho; Vicki Ling; Susan Goodman; Michael Parks; Bheeshma Ravi; Samprit Banerjee; Fei Wang; Said Ibrahim; Peter Cram
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 4.  Paediatric kidney transplantation in under-resourced regions-a panoramic view.

Authors:  Arpana Iyengar; M I McCulloch
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 3.651

Review 5.  Policy in pediatric nephrology: successes, failures, and the impact on disparities.

Authors:  Jill R Krissberg; Scott M Sutherland; Lisa J Chamberlain; Paul H Wise
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.714

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.