Literature DB >> 29529654

CORR Insights®: Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study.

Kodali Siva R K Prasad1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 29529654      PMCID： PMC6259685          DOI： 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN： 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Clinical experience of revision of metal on metal hip arthroplasty for aseptic lymphocyte dominated vasculitis associated lesions (ALVAL).

Authors:  Asim Rajpura; Martyn L Porter; Anil K Gambhir; Anthony J Freemont; Timothy N Board
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  Periprosthetic joint infection: the last frontier.

Authors:  J Parvizi; F S Haddad
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome.

Authors:  G Grammatopoulos; G Grammatopolous; H Pandit; Y-M Kwon; R Gundle; P McLardy-Smith; D J Beard; D W Murray; H S Gill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-08

4.  Revisions of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: lessons learned and improved outcome.

Authors:  Koen A De Smet; Catherine Van Der Straeten; Maarten Van Orsouw; Rachid Doubi; Katrien Backers; George Grammatopoulos
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Scoring the Current Risk Stratification Guidelines in Follow-up Evaluation of Patients After Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty: A Proposal for a Metal-on-Metal Risk Score Supporting Clinical Decision-Making.

Authors:  Daniel K Hussey; Rami Madanat; Gabrielle S Donahue; Ola Rolfson; Charles R Bragdon; Orhun K Muratoglu; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Complications Are Not Increased With Acetabular Revision of Metal-on-metal Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Colin T Penrose; Thorsten M Seyler; Samuel S Wellman; Michael P Bolognesi; Paul F Lachiewicz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Risk stratification algorithm for management of patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: consensus statement of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, and the Hip Society.

Authors:  Young-Min Kwon; Adolph V Lombardi; Joshua J Jacobs; Thomas K Fehring; Courtland G Lewis; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Revision of Failed Hip Resurfacing and Large Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Dual-Mobility Components.

Authors:  Nimrod Snir; Brian K Park; Garret Garofolo; Scott E Marwin
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.390

9.  High complication rate after revision of large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jacob T Munro; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Hemant G Pandit; David W Murray
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.