Literature DB >> 17986613

Conifer ovulate cones accumulate pollen principally by simple impaction.

James E Cresswell1, Kevin Henning, Christophe Pennel, Mohamed Lahoubi, Michael A Patrick, Phillipe G Young, Gavin R Tabor.   

Abstract

In many pine species (Family Pinaceae), ovulate cones structurally resemble a turbine, which has been widely interpreted as an adaptation for improving pollination by producing complex aerodynamic effects. We tested the turbine interpretation by quantifying patterns of pollen accumulation on ovulate cones in a wind tunnel and by using simulation models based on computational fluid dynamics. We used computer-aided design and computed tomography to create computational fluid dynamics model cones. We studied three species: Pinus radiata, Pinus sylvestris, and Cedrus libani. Irrespective of the approach or species studied, we found no evidence that turbine-like aerodynamics made a significant contribution to pollen accumulation, which instead occurred primarily by simple impaction. Consequently, we suggest alternative adaptive interpretations for the structure of ovulate cones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17986613      PMCID: PMC2084310          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0706434104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  7 in total

1.  Aerodynamics of saccate pollen and its implications for wind pollination.

Authors:  Andrew B Schwendemann; George Wang; Meredith L Mertz; Ryan T McWilliams; Scott L Thatcher; Jeffrey M Osborn
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.844

2.  How the Venus flytrap snaps.

Authors:  Yoël Forterre; Jan M Skotheim; Jacques Dumais; L Mahadevan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Simulated and empiric wind pollination patterns of conifer ovulate cones.

Authors:  K J Niklas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Pollination and airflow patterns around conifer ovulate cones.

Authors:  K J Niklas; K T U
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-07-30       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Factors limiting seed production of Taxus brevifolia (Taxaceae) in Western Oregon.

Authors:  S Difazio; M Wilson; N Vance
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.844

6.  How accessible are receptive megastrobili to pollen? the example of jack pine (Pinus banksiana).

Authors:  A M Roussy; P G Kevan
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.844

7.  Pollen production, microsporangium dehiscence and pollen flow in Himalayan cedar (Cedrus deodara Roxb. ex d. Don).

Authors:  V P Khanduri; C M Sharma
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.357

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Why are the seed cones of conifers so diverse at pollination?

Authors:  Juan M Losada; Andrew B Leslie
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Surface morphology enhances deposition efficiency in biomimetic, wind-driven fog collection.

Authors:  A Shahrokhian; J Feng; H King
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.118

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.