Literature DB >> 32236476

Intersections of machine learning and epidemiological methods for health services research.

Sherri Rose1.   

Abstract

The field of health services research is broad and seeks to answer questions about the health care system. It is inherently interdisciplinary, and epidemiologists have made crucial contributions. Parametric regression techniques remain standard practice in health services research with machine learning techniques currently having low penetrance in comparison. However, studies in several prominent areas, including health care spending, outcomes and quality, have begun deploying machine learning tools for these applications. Nevertheless, major advances in epidemiological methods are also as yet underleveraged in health services research. This article summarizes the current state of machine learning in key areas of health services research, and discusses important future directions at the intersection of machine learning and epidemiological methods for health services research.
© The Author(s) 2020; all rights reserved. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Machine learning; health outcomes; health quality; health services research

Year:  2021        PMID: 32236476      PMCID: PMC7825941          DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyaa035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  57 in total

1.  Observing versus Predicting: Initial Patterns of Filling Predict Long-Term Adherence More Accurately Than High-Dimensional Modeling Techniques.

Authors:  Jessica M Franklin; William H Shrank; Joyce Lii; Alexis K Krumme; Olga S Matlin; Troyen A Brennan; Niteesh K Choudhry
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Exploring the predictive power of interaction terms in a sophisticated risk equalization model using regression trees.

Authors:  S H C M van Veen; R C van Kleef; W P M M van de Ven; R C J A van Vliet
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Using Super Learner Prediction Modeling to Improve High-dimensional Propensity Score Estimation.

Authors:  Richard Wyss; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Mark van der Laan; Samuel D Lendle; Cheng Ju; Jessica M Franklin
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Mental Health Risk Adjustment with Clinical Categories and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Akritee Shrestha; Savannah Bergquist; Ellen Montz; Sherri Rose
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Assumption Trade-Offs When Choosing Identification Strategies for Pre-Post Treatment Effect Estimation: An Illustration of a Community-Based Intervention in Madagascar.

Authors:  Ann M Weber; Mark J van der Laan; Maya L Petersen
Journal:  J Causal Inference       Date:  2015-03

6.  Variation In Accountable Care Organization Spending And Sensitivity To Risk Adjustment: Implications For Benchmarking.

Authors:  Sherri Rose; Alan M Zaslavsky; J Michael McWilliams
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Machine-Learning Algorithms Predict Graft Failure After Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Lawrence Lau; Yamuna Kankanige; Benjamin Rubinstein; Robert Jones; Christopher Christophi; Vijayaragavan Muralidharan; James Bailey
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Population-Level Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes From Claims Data and Analysis of Risk Factors.

Authors:  Narges Razavian; Saul Blecker; Ann Marie Schmidt; Aaron Smith-McLallen; Somesh Nigam; David Sontag
Journal:  Big Data       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.128

9.  Achieving Mental Health Care Parity Might Require Changes In Payments And Competition.

Authors:  Thomas G McGuire
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Using routinely collected data to understand and predict adverse outcomes in opioid agonist treatment: Protocol for the Opioid Agonist Treatment Safety (OATS) Study.

Authors:  Sarah Larney; Matthew Hickman; David A Fiellin; Timothy Dobbins; Suzanne Nielsen; Nicola R Jones; Richard P Mattick; Robert Ali; Louisa Degenhardt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  6 in total

1.  Is the Way Forward to Step Back? Documenting the Frequency With Which Study Goals Are Misaligned With Study Methods and Interpretations in the Epidemiologic Literature.

Authors:  Katrina L Kezios
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.280

2.  Using random forest to identify longitudinal predictors of health in a 30-year cohort study.

Authors:  Bette Loef; Albert Wong; Nicole A H Janssen; Maciek Strak; Jurriaan Hoekstra; H Susan J Picavet; H C Hendriek Boshuizen; W M Monique Verschuren; Gerrie-Cor M Herber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Reproducibility of prediction models in health services research.

Authors:  Lazaros Belbasis; Orestis A Panagiotou
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2022-06-11

Review 4.  Current Artificial Intelligence (AI) Techniques, Challenges, and Approaches in Controlling and Fighting COVID-19: A Review.

Authors:  Umar Albalawi; Mohammed Mustafa
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 5.  [Perspectives for rheumatological health services research at the German Rheumatism Research Center].

Authors:  K Albrecht; F Milatz; J Callhoff; I Redeker; K Minden; A Strangfeld; A Regierer
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Multivariable prediction models for health care spending using machine learning: a protocol of a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew W Huang; Martin Haslberger; Neto Coulibaly; Omar Galárraga; Arman Oganisian; Lazaros Belbasis; Orestis A Panagiotou
Journal:  Diagn Progn Res       Date:  2022-03-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.