Literature DB >> 29524076

Non-compact myocardium assessment by cardiac magnetic resonance: dependence on image analysis method.

Vincenzo Positano1, Antonella Meloni2, Francesca Macaione3, Maria Filomena Santarelli4, Laura Pistoia2, Andrea Barison2, Salvatore Novo3, Alessia Pepe2.   

Abstract

To compare image analysis methods for the assessment of left ventricle non-compaction from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. CMR images were analyzed in 20 patients and 10 normal subjects. A reference model of the MR signal was introduced and validated based on image data. Non-compact (NC) myocardium size and distribution were assessed by tracing a single, continuous contour delimiting trabeculated region (Jacquier) or by one-by-one selection of trabeculae (Grothoff). The global non-compact/compact (NC/C) ratio, the NC mass, and the segmental NC/C ratio were assessed. Results were compared with the reference model. A significant difference between Grothoff and Jacquier approaches in the estimation of NC/C ratio (32.08 ± 6.63 vs. 19.81 ± 5.72, p < 0.0001) and NC mass (26.59 ± 8.36 vs. 14.15 ± 5.73 g/m2, p < 0.0001) was found. The Grothoff approach better matches the expected signal distribution. Inter-observer reproducibility of both Grothoff and Jacquier methods was adequate (9.71 and 8.22%, respectively) with no significant difference between observers. Jacquier and Grothoff approaches are not interchangeable so that specific diagnostic thresholds should be used for different image analysis methods. Grothoff method seems to better capture the true extension of trabeculated tissue.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-assisted image analysis; Isolated noncompaction of the ventricular myocardium; Magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29524076     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-018-1331-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  33 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Standardized T2* map of normal human heart in vivo to correct T2* segmental artefacts.

Authors:  Vincenzo Positano; Alessia Pepe; Maria Filomena Santarelli; Barbara Scattini; Daniele De Marchi; Anna Ramazzotti; Gianluca Forni; Caterina Borgna-Pignatti; Maria Eliana Lai; Massimo Midiri; Aurelio Maggio; Massimo Lombardi; Luigi Landini
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Noise in MRI.

Authors:  A Macovski
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy: an overdiagnosed disease.

Authors:  Markus Niemann; Stefan Störk; Frank Weidemann
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Correlation of trabeculae and papillary muscles with clinical and cardiac characteristics and impact on CMR measures of LV anatomy and function.

Authors:  Michael L Chuang; Philimon Gona; Gilion L T F Hautvast; Carol J Salton; Susan J Blease; Susan B Yeon; Marcel Breeuwer; Christopher J O'Donnell; Warren J Manning
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-11

6.  Reference values of cardiac volumes, dimensions, and new functional parameters by MR: A multicenter, multivendor study.

Authors:  Giovanni Donato Aquaro; Giovanni Camastra; Lorenzo Monti; Massimo Lombardi; Alessia Pepe; Silvia Castelletti; Viviana Maestrini; Giancarlo Todiere; Piergiorgio Masci; Gabriella di Giovine; Andrea Barison; Santo Dellegrottaglie; Martina Perazzolo Marra; Gianluca Pontone; Gianluca Di Bella
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Left Ventricular Noncompaction in Patients Referred for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Alexander Ivanov; Devindra S Dabiesingh; Geetha P Bhumireddy; Ambreen Mohamed; Ahmed Asfour; William M Briggs; Jean Ho; Saadat A Khan; Alexandra Grossman; Igor Klem; Terrence J Sacchi; John F Heitner
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 7.792

8.  The relationship of left ventricular trabeculation to ventricular function and structure over a 9.5-year follow-up: the MESA study.

Authors:  Filip Zemrak; Mark A Ahlman; Gabriella Captur; Saidi A Mohiddin; Nadine Kawel-Boehm; Martin R Prince; James C Moon; William G Hundley; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke; Steffen E Petersen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Morphogenetic aspects of the septomarginal trabecula in the human heart.

Authors:  Adam Kosiński; Dariusz Kozłowski; Janusz Nowiński; Ewa Lewicka; Alicja Dąbrowska-Kugacka; Grzegorz Raczak; Marek Grzybiak
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.318

10.  Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post processing.

Authors:  Jeanette Schulz-Menger; David A Bluemke; Jens Bremerich; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Raymond J Kim; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Christopher M Kramer; Dudley J Pennell; Sven Plein; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  4 in total

1.  The prognostic role of CMR using global planimetric criteria in patients with excessive left ventricular trabeculation.

Authors:  Francesca Macaione; Antonella Meloni; Vincenzo Positano; Andrea Barison; Giancarlo Todiere; Laura Pistoia; Daniela Di Lisi; Giuseppina Novo; Salvatore Novo; Alessia Pepe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Influence of observer-dependency on left ventricular hypertrabeculation mass measurement and its relationship with left ventricular volume and ejection fraction -  comparison between manual and semiautomatic CMR image analysis methods.

Authors:  Marcin Kubik; Alicja Dąbrowska-Kugacka; Karolina Dorniak; Marta Kutniewska-Kubik; Ludmiła Daniłowicz-Szymanowicz; Ewa Lewicka; Edyta Szurowska; Grzegorz Raczak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Left ventricular noncompaction: a disorder with genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity-a narrative review.

Authors:  Keiichi Hirono; Fukiko Ichida
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2022-08

Review 4.  Ventricular non-compaction review.

Authors:  Shaurya Srivastava; Majid Yavari; Abdullah Al-Abcha; Sandeep Banga; George Abela
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.654

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.