| Literature DB >> 29522442 |
Shailesh Gurung1, Dima White2, Gregory Archer3, Dan Zhao4, Yuhua Farnell5, J Allen Byrd6, E David Peebles7, Morgan Farnell8.
Abstract
Hatched male layer chicks are currently euthanized by maceration in the United States. Public concerns on the use of maceration have led to the search for alternative methods. We hypothesized that gas inhalation and low atmospheric pressure stunning (LAPS) are viable and humane alternatives to instantaneous mechanical destruction. The objective of this study was to evaluate the physiological and behavioral responses of recently hatched male layer chicks when subjected to carbon dioxide, nitrogen inhalation, or LAPS. The study consisted of seven treatments: breathing air (NEG), 25% carbon dioxide (CO₂), 50% CO₂, 75% CO₂, 90% CO₂, 100% nitrogen (N₂), or LAPS. Ten day-of-hatch, male layer chicks were randomly assigned to each treatment, and each treatment was replicated on ten different days. A custom-made vacuum system was used to reduce air pressure inside the chamber from 100.12 kPa to 15.3 kPa for the LAPS treatment. Serum corticosterone and serotonin levels were measured using commercially available competitive enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Latencies to loss of posture and motionlessness were determined from video recordings. The 25% and 50% CO₂ treatments were discontinued after the first replication, as the majority of the chicks recovered. The chicks in the negative (NEG) group had significantly higher levels of corticosterone than the other four euthanasia treatments. On the other hand, the serotonin levels of chicks in the NEG group was significantly lower when compared to the other four euthanasia treatments. The latencies to loss of posture and motionlessness of chicks exposed to 75% and 90% CO₂ were significantly shorter than those in the LAPS and N₂ inhalation treatments. These data suggest that the stress responses of chicks to the CO₂, N₂, and LAPS treatments do not differ among each other. However, the CO₂ inhalation method was faster in inducing loss of posture and motionlessness in chicks than the LAPS and N₂ inhalation treatments.Entities:
Keywords: euthanasia; gas inhalation; low atmospheric pressure stunning; male layer chicks
Year: 2018 PMID: 29522442 PMCID: PMC5867525 DOI: 10.3390/ani8030037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Figure 1Carbon dioxide wash-in curve (concentration vs. time). The carbon dioxide concentration in the beginning of the treatment was 0.04% which increased to 90% as the chamber was being filled by carbon dioxide gas. An infrared CO2 sensor measured the gas concentration inside the chamber during the experiment.
Figure 2Oxygen wash-out curve (concentration vs. time). The oxygen concentration at the beginning of the treatment was 20.9%, which decreased to less than 2% as the chamber was being filled by nitrogen gas. An electrochemical oxygen sensor measured the oxygen concentration inside the chamber.
Figure 3Pressure wash-out curve (pressure vs. time). The air pressure of the chamber was decreased from 100.12 kPa to 15.3 kPa during the LAPS treatment. The custom-built vacuum system was equipped with a vacuum controller, which measured and maintained negative air pressure within the chamber.
Figure 4Mean serum corticosterone levels of male layer chicks. The CORT concentrations were measured in duplicate and expressed in ng/mL. Bars (mean ± SEM) with different superscripts (a,b) are significantly different by Fisher’s LSD test (p < 0.05). Number of samples per treatment was 100.
Figure 5Mean serum serotonin levels of male layer chicks. The 5-HT concentrations were measured in duplicate and expressed in µg/mL. Bars (mean ± SEM) with different superscripts are significantly different by Fisher’s LSD test (p < 0.05). Number of samples per treatment was 20.
Figure 6Mean latencies to loss of posture and motionlessness of male layer chicks. The latencies are expressed in s. Bars (mean ± SEM) with different superscripts are significantly different by Fisher’s LSD test (p < 0.05). Number of samples per treatment was 10.