Literature DB >> 29522138

Pacritinib vs Best Available Therapy, Including Ruxolitinib, in Patients With Myelofibrosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

John Mascarenhas1, Ronald Hoffman1, Moshe Talpaz2, Aaron T Gerds3, Brady Stein4, Vikas Gupta5, Anita Szoke6, Mark Drummond7, Alexander Pristupa8, Tanya Granston9, Robert Daly9, Suliman Al-Fayoumi9, Jennifer A Callahan9, Jack W Singer9, Jason Gotlib10, Catriona Jamieson11, Claire Harrison12, Ruben Mesa13, Srdan Verstovsek14.   

Abstract

Importance: Myelofibrosis is a hematologic malignancy characterized by splenomegaly and debilitating symptoms. Thrombocytopenia is a poor prognostic feature and limits use of Janus kinase 1 (JAK1)/Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor ruxolitinib. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of JAK2 inhibitor pacritinib with that of best available therapy (BAT), including ruxolitinib, in patients with myelofibrosis and thrombocytopenia. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this phase 3 randomized international multicenter study-the PERSIST-2 study-of pacritinib vs BAT, 311 patients with myelofibrosis and platelet count 100 × 109/L or less were recruited for analysis. Crossover from BAT was allowed after week 24 or for progression of splenomegaly. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to pacritinib 400 mg once daily, pacritinib 200 mg twice daily, or BAT. Main Outcomes and Measures: Coprimary end points were rates of patients achieving 35% or more spleen volume reduction (SVR) and 50% or more reduction in total symptom score (TSS) at week 24. Efficacy analyses were performed on the intention-to-treat efficacy population, comprising all patients with a randomization date allowing for week 24 data.
Results: Overall, 311 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.70 [9.08] years; 171 men [55%] and 140 women [45%]) were included in the study; 149 patients (48%) had prior ruxolitinib. The most common BAT was ruxolitinib (44 patients [45%]); 19 patients (19%) received watchful-waiting only. The intention-to-treat efficacy population included 75 patients randomized to pacritinib once daily; 74, pacritinib twice daily, and 72, BAT. Pacritinib (arms combined) was more effective than BAT for 35% or more SVR (27 patients [18%] vs 2 patients [3%]; P = .001) and had a nonsignificantly greater rate of 50% or more reduction in TSS (37 patients [25%] vs 10 patients [14%]; P = .08). Pacritinib twice daily led to significant improvements in both end points over BAT (≥35% SVR: 16 patients [22%] vs 2 patients [3%]; P = .001; ≥50% reduction in TSS: 24 patients [32%] vs 10 patients [14%]; P = .01). Clinical improvement in hemoglobin and reduction in transfusion burden were greatest with pacritinib twice daily. For pacritinib once daily, pacritinib twice daily, and BAT, the most common (>10%) grade 3 or 4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (32 patients [31%], 34 patients [32%], 18 patients [18%]), and anemia (28 patients [27%], 23 patients [22%], 14 patients [14%]). In the pacritinib once daily, twice daily, and BAT arms, discontinuation owing to adverse events occurred in 15 patients (14%), 10 patients (9%), and 4 patients (4%). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with myelofibrosis and thrombocytopenia, including those with prior anti-JAK therapy, pacritinib twice daily was more effective than BAT, including ruxolitinib, for reducing splenomegaly and symptoms. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02055781.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29522138      PMCID: PMC5885169          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  14 in total

Review 1.  Intention-to-treat principle.

Authors:  V M Montori; G H Guyatt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-11-13       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  One thousand patients with primary myelofibrosis: the mayo clinic experience.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi; Terra L Lasho; Thitina Jimma; Christy M Finke; Naseema Gangat; Rakhee Vaidya; Kebede H Begna; Aref Al-Kali; Rhett P Ketterling; Curtis A Hanson; Animesh Pardanani
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Pacritinib versus best available therapy for the treatment of myelofibrosis irrespective of baseline cytopenias (PERSIST-1): an international, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Ruben A Mesa; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Adam Mead; Miklos Egyed; Anita Szoke; Aleksandr Suvorov; Janos Jakucs; Andrew Perkins; Ritam Prasad; Jiri Mayer; Judit Demeter; Peter Ganly; Jack W Singer; Huafeng Zhou; James P Dean; Peter A Te Boekhorst; Jyoti Nangalia; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Claire N Harrison
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 18.959

4.  DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status.

Authors:  Naseema Gangat; Domenica Caramazza; Rakhee Vaidya; Geeta George; Kebede Begna; Susan Schwager; Daniel Van Dyke; Curtis Hanson; Wenting Wu; Animesh Pardanani; Francisco Cervantes; Francesco Passamonti; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  What are RBC-transfusion-dependence and -independence?

Authors:  R P Gale; G Barosi; T Barbui; F Cervantes; K Dohner; B Dupriez; V Gupta; C Harrison; R Hoffman; J-J Kiladjian; R Mesa; M F Mc Mullin; F Passamonti; V Ribrag; G Roboz; G Saglio; A Vannucchi; S Verstovsek
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 3.156

6.  New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment.

Authors:  Francisco Cervantes; Brigitte Dupriez; Arturo Pereira; Francesco Passamonti; John T Reilly; Enrica Morra; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Ruben A Mesa; Jean-Loup Demory; Giovanni Barosi; Elisa Rumi; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Integrated genomic analysis illustrates the central role of JAK-STAT pathway activation in myeloproliferative neoplasm pathogenesis.

Authors:  Raajit Rampal; Fatima Al-Shahrour; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Jay P Patel; Jean-Philippe Brunel; Craig H Mermel; Adam J Bass; Jennifer Pretz; Jihae Ahn; Todd Hricik; Outi Kilpivaara; Martha Wadleigh; Lambert Busque; D Gary Gilliland; Todd R Golub; Benjamin L Ebert; Ross L Levine
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  How I treat myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Francisco Cervantes
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  Definition and management of ruxolitinib treatment failure in myelofibrosis.

Authors:  A Pardanani; A Tefferi
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 11.037

Review 10.  Profile of pacritinib and its potential in the treatment of hematologic disorders.

Authors:  Eleftheria Hatzimichael; Evangelos Tsolas; Evangelos Briasoulis
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2014-08-19
View more
  68 in total

Review 1.  Managing myelofibrosis (MF) that "blasts" through: advancements in the treatment of relapsed/refractory and blast-phase MF.

Authors:  Robyn M Scherber; Ruben A Mesa
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

Review 2.  The Rationale for Immunotherapy in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Authors:  Lucia Masarova; Prithviraj Bose; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.952

3.  Preclinical activity and a pilot phase I study of pacritinib, an oral JAK2/FLT3 inhibitor, and chemotherapy in FLT3-ITD-positive AML.

Authors:  Jae Yoon Jeon; Qiuhong Zhao; Daelynn R Buelow; Mitch Phelps; Alison R Walker; Alice S Mims; Sumithira Vasu; Gregory Behbehani; James Blachly; William Blum; Rebecca B Klisovic; John C Byrd; Ramiro Garzon; Sharyn D Baker; Bhavana Bhatnagar
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 4.  New Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose; Mansour Alfayez; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-01-24

5.  Interferon Therapy in Myelofibrosis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Bewersdorf; Smith Giri; Rong Wang; Nikolai Podoltsev; Robert T Williams; Raajit K Rampal; Martin S Tallman; Amer M Zeidan; Maximilian Stahl
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2020-05-28

6.  Determining the recommended dose of pacritinib: results from the PAC203 dose-finding trial in advanced myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Aaron T Gerds; Michael R Savona; Bart L Scott; Moshe Talpaz; Miklos Egyed; Claire N Harrison; Abdulraheem Yacoub; Alessandro Vannucchi; Adam J Mead; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Jennifer O'Sullivan; Valentin García-Gutiérrez; Prithviraj Bose; Raajit K Rampal; Carole B Miller; Jeanne Palmer; Stephen T Oh; Sarah A Buckley; Diane R Mould; Kaori Ito; Shanthakumar Tyavanagimatt; Jennifer A Smith; Karisse Roman-Torres; Sri Devineni; Adam R Craig; John O Mascarenhas
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-11-24

Review 7.  Targeting Janus Kinases and Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 to Treat Inflammation, Fibrosis, and Cancer: Rationale, Progress, and Caution.

Authors:  Uddalak Bharadwaj; Moses M Kasembeli; Prema Robinson; David J Tweardy
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 25.468

8.  Outcomes of patients with myelofibrosis treated with compassionate use pacritinib: a sponsor-independent international study.

Authors:  J Mascarenhas; E Virtgaym; M Stal; H Blacklock; A T Gerds; R Mesa; P Ganly; D Snyder; I Tabbara; D Tremblay; E Moshier
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 9.  Modern management of splenomegaly in patients with myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Douglas Tremblay; Myron Schwartz; Richard Bakst; Rahul Patel; Thomas Schiano; Marina Kremyanskaya; Ronald Hoffman; John Mascarenhas
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 10.  Proactive steps to optimize the management of polycythemia vera and myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Ruben A Mesa
Journal:  Clin Adv Hematol Oncol       Date:  2019-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.