Literature DB >> 33232476

Determining the recommended dose of pacritinib: results from the PAC203 dose-finding trial in advanced myelofibrosis.

Aaron T Gerds1, Michael R Savona2, Bart L Scott3, Moshe Talpaz4, Miklos Egyed5, Claire N Harrison6, Abdulraheem Yacoub7, Alessandro Vannucchi8, Adam J Mead9, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian10, Jennifer O'Sullivan9, Valentin García-Gutiérrez11, Prithviraj Bose12, Raajit K Rampal13, Carole B Miller14, Jeanne Palmer15, Stephen T Oh16, Sarah A Buckley17, Diane R Mould18, Kaori Ito18, Shanthakumar Tyavanagimatt17, Jennifer A Smith17, Karisse Roman-Torres17, Sri Devineni17, Adam R Craig17, John O Mascarenhas19.   

Abstract

PAC203 is a randomized dose-finding study of pacritinib, an oral JAK2/IRAK1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced myelofibrosis who are intolerant of or resistant to ruxolitinib. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to pacritinib 100 mg once per day, 100 mg twice per day, or 200 mg twice per day. Enhanced eligibility criteria, monitoring, and dose modifications were implemented to mitigate risk of cardiac and hemorrhagic events. Efficacy was based on ≥35% spleen volume response (SVR) and ≥50% reduction in the 7-component total symptom score (TSS) through week 24. Of 161 patients, 73% were intolerant of and 76% had become resistant to ruxolitinib; 50% met criteria for both. Severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50 × 103/μL) was present in 44%. SVR rates were highest with 200 mg twice per day (100 mg once per day, 0%; 100 mg twice per day, 1.8%; 200 mg twice per day, 9.3%), particularly among patients with baseline platelet counts <50 × 103/μL (17%; 4 of 24). Although TSS response rate was similar across doses (100 mg once per day, 7.7%; 100 mg twice per day, 7.3%; 200 mg twice per day, 7.4%), median percent reduction in TSS suggested a dose-response relationship (-3%, -16%, and -27%, respectively). Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling based on all available data showed greatest SVR and TSS reduction at 200 mg twice per day compared with lower doses. Common adverse events were gastrointestinal events, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. There was no excess of grade ≥3 hemorrhagic or cardiac events at 200 mg twice per day. Pacritinib 200 mg twice per day demonstrated clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile and was selected as the recommended dose for a pivotal phase 3 study in patients with myelofibrosis and severe thrombocytopenia. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03165734.
© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33232476      PMCID: PMC7686901          DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Adv        ISSN: 2473-9529


  25 in total

1.  A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Srdan Verstovsek; Ruben A Mesa; Jason Gotlib; Richard S Levy; Vikas Gupta; John F DiPersio; John V Catalano; Michael Deininger; Carole Miller; Richard T Silver; Moshe Talpaz; Elliott F Winton; Jimmie H Harvey; Murat O Arcasoy; Elizabeth Hexner; Roger M Lyons; Ronald Paquette; Azra Raza; Kris Vaddi; Susan Erickson-Viitanen; Iphigenia L Koumenis; William Sun; Victor Sandor; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Targeted deep sequencing in primary myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi; Terra L Lasho; Christy M Finke; Yoseph Elala; Curtis A Hanson; Rhett P Ketterling; Naseema Gangat; Animesh Pardanani
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2016-11-30

3.  Symptom burden profile in myelofibrosis patients with thrombocytopenia: Lessons and unmet needs.

Authors:  Allison H Scotch; Heidi Kosiorek; Robyn Scherber; Amylou C Dueck; Stefanie Slot; Sonja Zweegman; Peter A W Te Boekhorst; Suzan Commandeur; Harry Schouten; Federico Sackmann; Ana Kerguelen Fuentes; Dolores Hernández-Maraver; Heike L Pahl; Martin Griesshammer; Frank Stegelmann; Konstanze Döhner; Thomas Lehmann; Karin Bonatz; Andreas Reiter; Francoise Boyer; Gabriel Etienne; Jean-Christophe Ianotto; Dana Ranta; Lydia Roy; Jean-Yves Cahn; Claire N Harrison; Deepti Radia; Pablo Muxi; Norman Maldonado; Carlos Besses; Francisco Cervantes; Peter L Johansson; Tiziano Barbui; Giovanni Barosi; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Chiara Paoli; Francesco Passamonti; Bjorn Andreasson; Maria L Ferrari; Alessandro Rambaldi; Jan Samuelsson; Gunnar Birgegard; Zhijian Xiao; Zefeng Xu; Yue Zhang; Xiujuan Sun; Junqing Xu; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Peihong Zhang; Robert Peter Gale; Ruben A Mesa; Holly L Geyer
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 3.156

4.  DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status.

Authors:  Naseema Gangat; Domenica Caramazza; Rakhee Vaidya; Geeta George; Kebede Begna; Susan Schwager; Daniel Van Dyke; Curtis Hanson; Wenting Wu; Animesh Pardanani; Francisco Cervantes; Francesco Passamonti; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  What are RBC-transfusion-dependence and -independence?

Authors:  R P Gale; G Barosi; T Barbui; F Cervantes; K Dohner; B Dupriez; V Gupta; C Harrison; R Hoffman; J-J Kiladjian; R Mesa; M F Mc Mullin; F Passamonti; V Ribrag; G Roboz; G Saglio; A Vannucchi; S Verstovsek
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 3.156

6.  Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: differences between improvement and worsening.

Authors:  David Cella; Elizabeth A Hahn; Kelly Dineen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  The Myelodepletive Phenotype in Myelofibrosis: Clinical Relevance and Therapeutic Implication.

Authors:  Bridget K Marcellino; Srdan Verstovsek; John Mascarenhas
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2020-02-26

8.  Safety and Efficacy of Fedratinib in Patients With Primary or Secondary Myelofibrosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Animesh Pardanani; Claire Harrison; Jorge E Cortes; Francisco Cervantes; Ruben A Mesa; Donald Milligan; Tamás Masszi; Elena Mishchenko; Eric Jourdan; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Mark W Drummond; Mindaugas Jurgutis; Kazimierz Kuliczkowski; Emanuil Gheorghita; Francesco Passamonti; Frank Neumann; Abhay Patki; Guozhi Gao; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 31.777

9.  Mutation landscape in patients with myelofibrosis receiving ruxolitinib or hydroxyurea.

Authors:  Annalisa Pacilli; Giada Rotunno; Carmela Mannarelli; Tiziana Fanelli; Alessandro Pancrazzi; Elisa Contini; Francesco Mannelli; Francesca Gesullo; Niccolò Bartalucci; Giuditta Corbizi Fattori; Chiara Paoli; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Paola Guglielmelli
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 11.037

10.  Long-term findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study of ruxolitinib vs best available therapy for myelofibrosis.

Authors:  C N Harrison; A M Vannucchi; J-J Kiladjian; H K Al-Ali; H Gisslinger; L Knoops; F Cervantes; M M Jones; K Sun; M McQuitty; V Stalbovskaya; P Gopalakrishna; T Barbui
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 11.528

View more
  9 in total

1.  Disease Modification in Myelofibrosis: An Elusive Goal?

Authors:  Pankit Vachhani; Srdan Verstovsek; Prithviraj Bose
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Role of JAK inhibitors in myeloproliferative neoplasms: current point of view and perspectives.

Authors:  Giuseppe G Loscocco; Alessandro M Vannucchi
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 3.  JAK Be Nimble: Reviewing the Development of JAK Inhibitors and JAK Inhibitor Combinations for Special Populations of Patients with Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Andrew T Kuykendall; Rami S Komrokji
Journal:  J Immunother Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-06-22

4.  Retrospective analysis of pacritinib in patients with myelofibrosis and severe thrombocytopenia.

Authors:  Srdan Verstovsek; Ruben Mesa; Moshe Talpaz; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Claire N Harrison; Stephen T Oh; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Raajit Rampal; Bart L Scott; Sarah A Buckley; Adam R Craig; Karisse Roman-Torres; John O Mascarenhas
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 11.047

Review 5.  Next Generation Therapeutics for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Douglas Tremblay; John Mascarenhas
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 6.  The clinical dilemma of JAK inhibitor failure in myelofibrosis: Predictive characteristics and outcomes.

Authors:  John O Mascarenhas; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 6.921

Review 7.  JAK2 Alterations in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Molecular Insights for Superior Precision Medicine Strategies.

Authors:  Charlotte Ej Downes; Barbara J McClure; Daniel P McDougal; Susan L Heatley; John B Bruning; Daniel Thomas; David T Yeung; Deborah L White
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-07-12

8.  Efficacy and tolerability of Janus kinase inhibitors in myelofibrosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Damien Luque Paz; Jérémie Riou; Léa Sureau; Corentin Orvain; Jean-Christophe Ianotto; Valérie Ugo; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 11.037

Review 9.  SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Identifying and Treating "Progression" in Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2021-06-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.