Literature DB >> 28336242

Pacritinib versus best available therapy for the treatment of myelofibrosis irrespective of baseline cytopenias (PERSIST-1): an international, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Ruben A Mesa1, Alessandro M Vannucchi2, Adam Mead3, Miklos Egyed4, Anita Szoke5, Aleksandr Suvorov6, Janos Jakucs7, Andrew Perkins8, Ritam Prasad9, Jiri Mayer10, Judit Demeter11, Peter Ganly12, Jack W Singer13, Huafeng Zhou13, James P Dean13, Peter A Te Boekhorst14, Jyoti Nangalia15, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian16, Claire N Harrison17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Available therapies for myelofibrosis can exacerbate cytopenias and are not indicated for patients with severe thrombocytopenia. Pacritinib, which inhibits both JAK2 and FLT3, induced spleen responses with limited myelosuppression in phase 1/2 trials. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pacritinib versus best available therapy in patients with myelofibrosis irrespective of baseline cytopenias.
METHODS: This international, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial (PERSIST-1) was done at 67 sites in 12 countries. Patients with higher-risk myelofibrosis (with no exclusions for baseline anaemia or thrombocytopenia) were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive oral pacritinib 400 mg once daily or best available therapy (BAT) excluding JAK2 inhibitors until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Randomisation was stratified by risk category, platelet count, and region. Treatment assignments were known to investigators, site personnel, patients, clinical monitors, and pharmacovigilance personnel. The primary endpoint was spleen volume reduction (SVR) of 35% or more from baseline to week 24 in the intention-to-treat population as assessed by blinded, centrally reviewed MRI or CT. We did safety analyses in all randomised patients who received either treatment. Here we present the final data. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01773187.
FINDINGS: Between Jan 8, 2013, and Aug 1, 2014, 327 patients were randomly assigned to pacritinib (n=220) or BAT (n=107). Median follow-up was 23·2 months (IQR 14·8-28·7). At week 24, the primary endpoint of SVR of 35% or more was achieved by 42 (19%) patients in the pacritinib group versus five (5%) patients in the BAT group (p=0·0003). 90 patients in the BAT group crossed over to receive pacritinib at a median of 6·3 months (IQR 5·8-6·7). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events through week 24 were anaemia (n=37 [17%]), thrombocytopenia (n=26 [12%]), and diarrhoea (n=11 [5%]) in the pacritinib group, and anaemia (n=16 [15%]), thrombocytopenia (n=12 [11%]), dyspnoea (n=3 [3%]), and hypotension (n=3 [3%]) in the BAT group. The most common serious adverse events that occurred through week 24 were anaemia (10 [5%]), cardiac failure (5 [2%]), pyrexia (4 [2%]), and pneumonia (4 [2%]) with pacritinib, and anaemia (5 [5%]), sepsis (2 [2%]), and dyspnoea (2 [2%]) with BAT. Deaths due to adverse events were observed in 27 (12%) patients in the pacritinib group and 14 (13%) patients in the BAT group throughout the duration of the study.
INTERPRETATION: Pacritinib therapy was well tolerated and induced significant and sustained SVR and symptom reduction, even in patients with severe baseline cytopenias. Pacritinib could be a treatment option for patients with myelofibrosis, including those with baseline cytopenias for whom options are particularly limited. FUNDING: CTI BioPharma Corp.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28336242      PMCID: PMC8209752          DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30027-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Haematol        ISSN: 2352-3026            Impact factor:   18.959


  26 in total

1.  JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Claire Harrison; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali; Heinz Gisslinger; Roger Waltzman; Viktoriya Stalbovskaya; Mari McQuitty; Deborah S Hunter; Richard Levy; Laurent Knoops; Francisco Cervantes; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Tiziano Barbui; Giovanni Barosi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  How I treat myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  CYT387, a selective JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor: in vitro assessment of kinase selectivity and preclinical studies using cell lines and primary cells from polycythemia vera patients.

Authors:  A Pardanani; T Lasho; G Smith; C J Burns; E Fantino; A Tefferi
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Specificity and mechanism-of-action of the JAK2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors ruxolitinib and SAR302503 (TG101348).

Authors:  T Zhou; S Georgeon; R Moser; D J Moore; A Caflisch; O Hantschel
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  How I treat myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Francisco Cervantes
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  IRAK signalling in cancer.

Authors:  G W Rhyasen; D T Starczynowski
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Safety and efficacy of CYT387, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis.

Authors:  A Pardanani; R R Laborde; T L Lasho; C Finke; K Begna; A Al-Kali; W J Hogan; M R Litzow; A Leontovich; M Kowalski; A Tefferi
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  A major role for the protein tyrosine kinase JAK1 in the JAK/STAT signal transduction pathway in response to interleukin-6.

Authors:  D Guschin; N Rogers; J Briscoe; B Witthuhn; D Watling; F Horn; S Pellegrini; K Yasukawa; P Heinrich; G R Stark
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-04-03       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 9.  Profile of pacritinib and its potential in the treatment of hematologic disorders.

Authors:  Eleftheria Hatzimichael; Evangelos Tsolas; Evangelos Briasoulis
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2014-08-19

10.  Interim analysis of safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis and low platelet counts.

Authors:  Moshe Talpaz; Ronald Paquette; Lawrence Afrin; Solomon I Hamburg; Josef T Prchal; Katarzyna Jamieson; Howard R Terebelo; Gregory L Ortega; Roger M Lyons; Ramon V Tiu; Elliott F Winton; Kavita Natrajan; Olatoyosi Odenike; David Claxton; Wei Peng; Peter O'Neill; Susan Erickson-Viitanen; Lance Leopold; Victor Sandor; Richard S Levy; Hagop M Kantarjian; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 17.388

View more
  76 in total

Review 1.  Managing myelofibrosis (MF) that "blasts" through: advancements in the treatment of relapsed/refractory and blast-phase MF.

Authors:  Robyn M Scherber; Ruben A Mesa
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

Review 2.  The Rationale for Immunotherapy in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Authors:  Lucia Masarova; Prithviraj Bose; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 3.  Leveraging JAK-STAT regulation in myelofibrosis to improve outcomes with allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant.

Authors:  Michael Byrne; Bipin Savani; Michael R Savona
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2018-07-16

4.  Preclinical activity and a pilot phase I study of pacritinib, an oral JAK2/FLT3 inhibitor, and chemotherapy in FLT3-ITD-positive AML.

Authors:  Jae Yoon Jeon; Qiuhong Zhao; Daelynn R Buelow; Mitch Phelps; Alison R Walker; Alice S Mims; Sumithira Vasu; Gregory Behbehani; James Blachly; William Blum; Rebecca B Klisovic; John C Byrd; Ramiro Garzon; Sharyn D Baker; Bhavana Bhatnagar
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 5.  Management of Myelofibrosis-Related Cytopenias.

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.952

6.  Nuclear-Cytoplasmic Transport Is a Therapeutic Target in Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Dongqing Yan; Anthony D Pomicter; Srinivas Tantravahi; Clinton C Mason; Anna V Senina; Jonathan M Ahmann; Qiang Wang; Hein Than; Ami B Patel; William L Heaton; Anna M Eiring; Phillip M Clair; Kevin C Gantz; Hannah M Redwine; Sabina I Swierczek; Brayden J Halverson; Erkan Baloglu; Sharon Shacham; Jamshid S Khorashad; Todd W Kelley; Mohamed E Salama; Rodney R Miles; Kenneth M Boucher; Josef T Prchal; Thomas O'Hare; Michael W Deininger
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  JAK2 inhibitors for myeloproliferative neoplasms: what is next?

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Predictive models for splenic response to JAK-inhibitor therapy in patients with myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Kamal Menghrajani; Philip S Boonstra; Jessica A Mercer; Cecelia Perkins; Krisstina L Gowin; Alissa A Weber; Ruben Mesa; Jason R Gotlib; Lixia Wang; Jack W Singer; Moshe Talpaz
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2018-09-20

Review 9.  New Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose; Mansour Alfayez; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-01-24

Review 10.  SOHO State-of-the-Art Update and Next Questions: MPN.

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose; Jason Gotlib; Claire N Harrison; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2018-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.