Kerry R Belton1, Yuan Tian1,2, Limin Zhang1,2, Mallappa Anitha1, Philip B Smith3, Gary H Perdew1, Andrew D Patterson1. 1. Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Center for Molecular Toxicology and Carcinogenesis , The Pennsylvania State University , University Park , Pennsylvania 16802 , United States. 2. CAS Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, National Centre for Magnetic Resonance in Wuhan, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics , University of Chinese Academy of Sciences , Wuhan 430071 , P. R. China. 3. Metabolomics Facility , The Pennsylvania State University , University Park , Pennsylvania 16802 , United States.
Abstract
The liver and the mammary gland have complementary metabolic roles during lactation. Substrates synthesized by the liver are released into the circulation and are taken up by the mammary gland for milk production. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) has been identified as a lactation regulator in mice, and its activation has been associated with myriad morphological, molecular, and functional defects such as stunted gland development, decreased milk production, and changes in gene expression. In this study, we identified adverse metabolic changes in the lactation network (mammary, liver, and serum) associated with AHR activation using 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based metabolomics. Pregnant mice expressing Ahr d (low affinity) or Ahr b (high affinity) were fed diets containing beta naphthoflavone (BNF), a potent AHR agonist. Mammary, serum, and liver metabolomics analysis identified significant changes in lipid and TCA cycle intermediates in the Ahr b mice. We observed decreased amino acid and glucose levels in the mammary gland extracts of Ahr b mice fed BNF. The serum of BNF fed Ahr b mice had significant changes in LDL/VLDL (increased) and HDL, PC, and GPC (decreased). Quantitative PCR analysis revealed ∼50% reduction in the expression of key lactogenesis mammary genes including whey acid protein, α-lactalbumin, and β-casein. We also observed morphologic and developmental disruptions in the mammary gland that are consistent with previous reports. Our observations support that AHR activity contributes to metabolism regulation in the lactation network.
The liver and the mammary gland have complementary metabolic roles during lactation. Substrates synthesized by the liver are released into the circulation and are taken up by the mammary gland for milk production. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) has been identified as a lactation regulator in mice, and its activation has been associated with myriad morphological, molecular, and functional defects such as stunted gland development, decreased milk production, and changes in gene expression. In this study, we identified adverse metabolic changes in the lactation network (mammary, liver, and serum) associated with AHR activation using 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based metabolomics. Pregnant mice expressing Ahr d (low affinity) or Ahr b (high affinity) were fed diets containing beta naphthoflavone (BNF), a potent AHR agonist. Mammary, serum, and liver metabolomics analysis identified significant changes in lipid and TCA cycle intermediates in the Ahr b mice. We observed decreased amino acid and glucose levels in the mammary gland extracts of Ahr b mice fed BNF. The serum of BNF fed Ahr b mice had significant changes in LDL/VLDL (increased) and HDL, PC, and GPC (decreased). Quantitative PCR analysis revealed ∼50% reduction in the expression of key lactogenesis mammary genes including whey acid protein, α-lactalbumin, and β-casein. We also observed morphologic and developmental disruptions in the mammary gland that are consistent with previous reports. Our observations support that AHR activity contributes to metabolism regulation in the lactation network.
Mammary gland differentiation
during lactation is complex and is
associated with extensive changes in its structure and function.[1] During pregnancy, the gland becomes highly proliferative,
initiating the development of epithelial ductal branching, elongation,
and development of lobulo-alveolar structure. This differentiation
process is hormone-dependent and its completion enables the synthesis
of milk. The lactation process is regulated by endogenous hormones
including prolactin, insulin, and corticosteroids.[2]Strikingly, significant numbers of women annually
are unable to
initiate and nutritionally support their infants through breastfeeding
or have difficulty doing so.[3] Human epidemiological
studies have demonstrated associations between environmental toxicants
and defects in lactation and suggest exposure to endocrine disruptors
(e.g., 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin, TCDD) during pregnancy have
the potential to disrupt lactation.[4−7] Several studies have shown that mammary
gland differentiation defects are mediated through the aryl hydrocarbon
receptor (AHR).[3,6,8−10] However, the precise metabolic consequences of this
dysregulation remain largely unclear and differences between mouse
and humanAHR in terms of their relative ligand affinities and selectivity
further complicate understanding the role of the AHR in the mammary
gland.[11] Despite these complexities, the
mouse has proven to be an invaluable tool for dissecting AHR signaling
pathways in the mammary gland.[3,10,12−14]The AHR is a transcription factor expressed
in various cell types
and tissues, and studies have confirmed AHR maintains an important
role in xenobiotic metabolism, immune homeostasis, and development.[15] AHR plays a critical role in cell cycle control,
regulation of apoptosis, and cell proliferation.[16] The general role of the AHR in the mammary gland is not
clearly understood, although mouse studies have revealed several critical
physiological functions for this receptor related to mammary gland
differentiation and lactation. For example, AHR protein was detected
in the mammary glands during estrous-stimulated growth and branching
of terminal end buds (TEBs).[17] Comparative
analysis of mammary gland development in Ahr with Ahr littermates revealed a 50% decline
in the formation of TEBs in Ahrmice. These reports highlight the physiological role AHR likely
plays in coordinating development, differentiation, cell growth, and
signaling of hormones in mammary tissue.The mouseAhr (high
affinity) or Ahr (low
affinity) alleles express AHR that exhibits significant differences
in TCDD responsiveness. The Ahr allele exhibits about 10-fold higher affinity for TCDD compared
with Ahr expressed from the Ahr.[18] Mice that
express either the Ahr or Ahr alleles on
the same genetic background provide an excellent model to further
understand various mechanisms of AHR-mediated toxicity.[19] In this study beta naphthoflavone (5,6-benzoflavone,
BNF), a potent agonist of the AHR, was given to pregnant mice via
the diet to study its effects on lactation and metabolism. We report
that dietary exposure to BNF significantly repressed mammary gland
differentiation in the Ahr (high affinity) mice and induced metabolic abnormalities.
Understanding mechanisms of AHR activation that lead to lactation
dysregulation may suggest preventative strategies in humans.
Materials
and Methods
Chemical Reagents
5,6-Benzoflavone, carmine alum, paraformaldehyde,
methyl salicylate, sodium chloride, K2HPO4,
and NaH2PO4 (all analytical grade) were obtained
from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. Ltd. (St Louis, MO). Sodium 3-trimethylsilyl
[2,2,3,3-d4] propionate (TSP-d4) and D2O (99.9%) were purchased from Cambridge
Isotope Laboratories (Miami, FL).
Animals and Treatments
C57Bl/6J mice expressing the Ahror Ahr allele
(6–8 weeks) were maintained
at The Pennsylvania State University. The Ahr (low affinity) mice served as an additional
control to determine if the effects of BNF were AHR-dependent. Female
mice were housed in pairs with male mice and checked daily for the
presence of vaginal plugs. Once vaginal plugs were observed in females,
the males were removed, and the pregnant mice were housed in pairs
for the remainder of the study. Mice were given diets containing 0.5
and 50 ppm BNF (0.5 mg or 50 mg per kilogram of AIN-76A diet, respectively)
and control (Dyets, Inc., Bethlehem, PA) ad libitum and were maintained
on a 12-h light cycle. BNF shows higher affinity for the Ahr allele.[20] Doses were chosen based on previous reports;[21,22] however, no studies to date have directly assessed the impact of
BNF on lactation. Females were maintained on the diet treatment from
conception until birth of their pups. Females were sacrificed 1 day
after birth using CO2 asphyxiation. Mammary glands were
removed, immediately used or frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored
at −80 °C. All animal treatments were conducted with the
approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of The
Pennsylvania State University.
Whole Mount Analysis
The right and left inguinal mammary
glands (#5 and #10) were carefully dissected 1 day after giving birth,
spread on a glass slide, and fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde
solution. Samples were rehydrated (70% ethanol for 30 min, 50% ethanol
for 30 min, 30% ethanol for 20 min, 10% ethanol for 20 min, and distilled
water for 5 min). Staining was performed overnight with carmine alum
(0.2% carmine dye and 0.5% aluminum potassium sulfate), followed by
dehydration the following day (70% ethanol for 30 min, 90% ethanol
for 30 min, and 100% for 30 min). Mammary glands were cleared with
xylene overnight and maintained in methyl salicylate. Sections were
examined on a Keyence BZ-9000 (Itasca, IL) and Olympus BX60 wide-field
microscope (Olympus). Evaluation of mammary differentiation was performed
without knowledge of treatment by three individuals. Images of the
glands were given a differentiation score based on a four-point scale
(1 = poor development/differentiation to 4 = excellent growth and
development). The subjective scoring scales were based on the differentiation
stage including degree of alveoli population, coverage of the adipose
tissue, and density of alveoli present in the parenchymal tissue.
HC11 Cell Culture and Induction with Lactogenic Hormones
Mouse mammary epithelial cells (HC11) were used with the permission
of Dr. Bernd Groner (Institute for Biomedical Research, Frankfurt,
Germany). HC11 cells were maintained at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in RPMI (HyClone, Logan, UT) medium containing 10% fetal
bovine serum (HyClone, Logan, UT), ITS-X full form (5 μg/mL;
Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), penicillin (100 IU/mL)/streptomycin (100
μg/mL), glutamine (1X; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and murineepidermal growth factor (EGF; 10 ng/mL; BD Biosciences, San Jose,
CA). For differentiation with lactogenic hormones (LH), ovine prolactin
(5 μg/mL; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and dexamethasone (10 nM/mL;
Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in EGF-free medium were used. For lactogenic
differentiation, 1 × 106 cells per well were seeded
onto 6-well tissue culture plates and grown to confluency. Two-day
confluent cultures were washed twice with PBS and grown for 48 additional
hours in culture media without EGF. EGF-free media was removed and
replaced with media containing LH and grown for 24 h. This media was
removed after 24 h. For treatment, LH mediaFBS were reduced to 2%.
Cells were treated with vehicle (0.1% DMSO), 25, 50, and 100 μM
BNF based on previous reports.[23] Throughout
each BNF treatment assay, medium was replaced every 24 h.
Quantitative
Real-Time PCR
The left and right abdominal
mammary glands (#4 and #9) were carefully dissected and flash frozen
in liquid nitrogen 1 day after giving birth. RNA was extracted from
frozen mammary tissue (∼50 mg) or cells using TRIzol reagent
(Invitrogen). All RNA samples were diluted to 1 μg/μL
using nuclease free water. cDNA was synthesized in a 20 μL reaction
volume using 1.0 μg of total RNA in 15 μL of nuclease
free water, 4 μL qScript cDNA supermix (Quanta, Maryland). A
total of 1 μL of cDNA was added to 3.6 μL of nuclease
free water and 0.4 μL of each forward and reverse primers were
added to the solution (900 nM forward, 900 nM reverse). Gene-specific
primers were used in each reaction, and all results were normalized
to β-actin. qPCR assays were carried out using SYBR Green PCR
Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, California) on an ABI Prism 7900HT
Fast Real-Time PCR sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems).
The reactions were analyzed according to the ΔΔCT method.
qPCR conditions were 40 cycles at 95 °C for 20 s; 95 °C
for 0.01 s; 60 °C for 30 s; 95 °C for 15 s; 60 °C for
15 s; and 95 °C for 15 s. Primers can be found in the Supporting Information (Table S1).
1H NMR-Based Metabolomics Experiments
Serum,
liver, and inguinal mammary gland sample preparation for NMR analyses
were performed as previously described.[24] Serum samples were prepared by mixing 200 μL of serum with
400 μL of saline solution containing 30% D2O; 550
μL of samples was transferred into 5 mm NMR tubes after vortexing
and centrifugation (11180g, 10 min, 4 °C). Inguinal
mammary glands (#8 and #10) and liver tissues (∼50 mg) were
extracted three times with 600 μL of a precooled methanol–water
mixture (2/1, v/v) using the Precellys tissue homogenizer (Bertin
Technologies, Rockville, MD). After centrifugation at 11180g for 10 min at 4 °C, the combined supernatants were
dried. Each of the aqueous extracts was separately reconstituted into
600 μL of phosphate buffer (K2HPO4/NaH2PO4, 0.1 M, pH 7.4, 50% v/v D2O) containing
0.005% sodium 3-trimethylsilyl [2,2,3,3-d4] propionate (TSP-d4) as chemical shift
reference. Following centrifugation, 550 μL of each extract
was transferred into a 5 mm NMR tube for NMR analysis. For more detailed
methods regarding 1H NMR spectroscopy, see Supporting Information.
Data Analysis
All experimental data were analyzed using
either one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post analysis (Ahr group) or unpaired t-test (Ahr). Sample sizes are indicated in the figure legends. Graphical illustrations
and statistical analysis were performed with GraphPad Prism version
6.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). P-values <0.05
were considered statistically significant.
Results
Effects of
Dietary BNF on Mammary Gland Morphology
Ahr and Ahrmice were treated with dietary BNF
(0.5 or 50 ppm) throughout pregnancy. Food intake for 6–8 weeks
old mice was estimated to be between 2.5 and 3.3 g/day. The dose of
BNF provided to mice on the 0.5 ppm diet was calculated to be approximately
1–1.5 μg/kg/day while the dose of BNF provided to mice
on the 50 ppm BNF diet was calculated to be approximately 100–150
μg/kg/day. No differences in food intake or body weight were
observed between the doses or genotypes (data not shown).One
day after parturition, mammary glands collected from control (no BNF)
and low affinity Ahrmice treated with BNF were completely populated with alveoli, to
such an extent that they covered the adipose tissue. As a result of
the dense alveoli present, ductal structures were challenging to observe
(Figure A,D,E). The
presence of milk could be noticed in the tissue during necropsy. In
contrast, defects were visible in glands collected from high affinity Ahrmice treated with BNF.
For instance, the adipose tissue was apparent, yet the parenchymal
tissue contained fewer numbers of alveoli, and when present, they
appeared unfilled and underdeveloped (Figure B,C). Based on blinded scoring, BNF exposure
through the diet caused interruption of mammary gland development
in Ahrmice treated
with BNF (Figure F).
BNF treated Ahrmice
revealed mild but not statistically significant changes in morphology.
Figure 1
BNF suppresses
lactogenic mammary gland development. Female Ahr (n = 6)
mice were fed diets containing 0.5 or 50 ppm BNF (0.5 mg or 50 mg
per kilogram of base diet) and control ad libitum. Representative
whole-mount images of the mammary glands from Ahr (A) control, (B) 0.5 ppm BNF-fed, and
(C) 50 ppm BNF-fed mice are shown. BNF fails to suppress lactogenic
mammary gland development in low affinity Ahr mice (D) control and (E) 50 ppm BNF-fed
mice (n = 4). (F) An average differentiation score
was determined in a blinded fashion. Results are shown as mean ±
SEM. All experimental data were analyzed using either one-way ANOVA
(Ahr) followed by Tukey’s
post analysis or unpaired t-test (Ahr). *P ≤ 0.05,
**P ≤ 0.01. Scale bar = 200 μm.
BNF suppresses
lactogenic mammary gland development. Female Ahr (n = 6)
mice were fed diets containing 0.5 or 50 ppm BNF (0.5 mg or 50 mg
per kilogram of base diet) and control ad libitum. Representative
whole-mount images of the mammary glands from Ahr (A) control, (B) 0.5 ppm BNF-fed, and
(C) 50 ppm BNF-fed mice are shown. BNF fails to suppress lactogenic
mammary gland development in low affinity Ahrmice (D) control and (E) 50 ppm BNF-fed
mice (n = 4). (F) An average differentiation score
was determined in a blinded fashion. Results are shown as mean ±
SEM. All experimental data were analyzed using either one-way ANOVA
(Ahr) followed by Tukey’s
post analysis or unpaired t-test (Ahr). *P ≤ 0.05,
**P ≤ 0.01. Scale bar = 200 μm.
Effects of Dietary BNF
on Overall Milk Secretion and Associated
Milk Gene and Protein Expression
Analysis of the mammary
gland tissue in Ahrmice
revealed that dietary exposure induced a significant increase in the
expression of Cyp1a1, in both BNF groups compared
to control (Figure A). BNF altered the coordinated induction of milk protein gene expression
(whey acid protein [Wap], β-casein, and α-lactalbumin [Lalba]) by greater than 50% in both treatment
groups compared to control (Figure B–D). BNF exposure (50 ppm) in Ahrmice had significantly decreased β-casein
protein expression (Figure E,F). Results from Ahrmice revealed no significant change in gene expression of
these milk genes (Figure A–D).
Figure 2
Dietary BNF suppresses lactogenic gene expression. Female Ahr (n = 6)
and Ahr (n = 4) mice were sacrificed 1 day after giving birth to their pups.
QPCR was used to measure lactogenic genes in both Ahr (n = 6) and Ahr (n = 4)
mice including (A) Cyp1a1, (B) whey acid
protein (Wap), (C) α-lactalbumin (Lalba), and (D) beta-casein. Protein
levels of β-casein (E) are suppressed following dietary BNF
exposure. Densitometry reveals a significant decrease in β-casein
(F). Results are shown as mean ± SEM. All experimental data were
analyzed using either one-way ANOVA (Ahr) followed by Tukey’s post analysis or unpaired t-test (Ahr). *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤
0.01.
Dietary BNF suppresses lactogenic gene expression. Female Ahr (n = 6)
and Ahr (n = 4) mice were sacrificed 1 day after giving birth to their pups.
QPCR was used to measure lactogenic genes in both Ahr (n = 6) and Ahr (n = 4)
mice including (A) Cyp1a1, (B) whey acid
protein (Wap), (C) α-lactalbumin (Lalba), and (D) beta-casein. Protein
levels of β-casein (E) are suppressed following dietary BNF
exposure. Densitometry reveals a significant decrease in β-casein
(F). Results are shown as mean ± SEM. All experimental data were
analyzed using either one-way ANOVA (Ahr) followed by Tukey’s post analysis or unpaired t-test (Ahr). *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤
0.01.
BNF Inhibition of Milk
Gene Expression in HC11 Mammary Epithelial
Cells
In order to provide further validation of that the
effects were due to BNF, HC11 mammary epithelial cell line cells were
grown in the presence of BNF. HC11 cells can be induced to differentiate
with lactogenic hormones (LH) and produce milk proteins in culture.[25,26] BNF significantly increased Cyp1a1 expression compared
to control and LH-treated cells (Figure A). BNF significantly reduced β-casein gene expression relative to the LH-treated cells (Figure B). BNF considerably reduced Lalba and Wap expression relative to the
LH-treated cells (Figure C,D).
Figure 3
BNF treatment inhibits milk gene expression in HC11 mammary
epithelial
cells. mRNA expression measured by QPCR for HC11 cells. The cells
were induced with lactogenic hormones (LH) to produce milk genes.
Cells were then treated with DMSO (control) or BNF for 48 h. mRNA
levels for (A) Cyp1a1, (B) β-casein, (C) Lalba, and (D) Wap are normalized
to β-actin. All experimental data were analyzed
using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post analysis compared
to LH-treated cells. Results represent three wells per group and representative
of two independent experiments. Data are shown as mean ± SEM
*P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01,
***P ≤ 0.001.
BNF treatment inhibits milk gene expression in HC11 mammary
epithelial
cells. mRNA expression measured by QPCR for HC11 cells. The cells
were induced with lactogenic hormones (LH) to produce milk genes.
Cells were then treated with DMSO (control) or BNF for 48 h. mRNA
levels for (A) Cyp1a1, (B) β-casein, (C) Lalba, and (D) Wap are normalized
to β-actin. All experimental data were analyzed
using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post analysis compared
to LH-treated cells. Results represent three wells per group and representative
of two independent experiments. Data are shown as mean ± SEM
*P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01,
***P ≤ 0.001.
1H NMR-Based Metabolomics Reveal Negative Metabolic
Effects of Dietary BNF on the Mammary Metabolome
We utilized 1H NMR-based metabolomics to monitor metabolic changes and
multivariate statistical analysis to evaluate the mammary, liver,
and serum metabolome changes induced by BNF exposure. The model quality
indicators Q2 were acceptable (Figure S1–3) and metabolite assignments consistent with previous
reports (Figure S4, Table S2).[24] Metabolomic analysis of the Ahr mammary gland revealed a decrease in
glucose (Figure A)
and increase in branched chain amino acids (BCAAs) and aromatic amino
acids. AhrBNF groups
had an increase of the citric acid cycle (TCA) intermediate fumarate,
suggesting decreased utilization and dysregulation of the TCA cycle
and energy production (Figure A). Results from the Ahrmice revealed no changes in mammary gland metabolism (Figure D). These results
suggest AHR may play a part in energy metabolism in the lactating
mammary gland.
Figure 4
Effects of dietary BNF on lactating mammary gland, liver,
and serum
metabolic function. Relative content of metabolites in the mammary
gland (A, D), liver (B, E), and serum (C, F) from Ahr and Ahr mice with or without dietary BNF (0.5 and 50 ppm)
were measured by 1H NMR analysis. All experimental data
were analyzed using either one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s
post analysis or unpaired t-test. Box and whisker
plots represent the min to max ranges. *P ≤
0.05, **P ≤ 0.01,***P ≤
0.001, ****P ≤ 0.0001 compared to control;
Δ P ≤ 0.05, ΔΔ P ≤ 0.01 compared to 0.5 ppm BNF.
Effects of dietary BNF on lactating mammary gland, liver,
and serum
metabolic function. Relative content of metabolites in the mammary
gland (A, D), liver (B, E), and serum (C, F) from Ahr and Ahrmice with or without dietary BNF (0.5 and 50 ppm)
were measured by 1H NMR analysis. All experimental data
were analyzed using either one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s
post analysis or unpaired t-test. Box and whisker
plots represent the min to max ranges. *P ≤
0.05, **P ≤ 0.01,***P ≤
0.001, ****P ≤ 0.0001 compared to control;
Δ P ≤ 0.05, ΔΔ P ≤ 0.01 compared to 0.5 ppm BNF.1H NMR spectra of aqueous liver extracts and serum
were
obtained from control and those fed BNF. Spectra from liver extracts
were predominantly amino acids (BCAAs, glutamine, glutamate, histidine,
phenylalanine, and tyrosine), glucose, glycogen, choline-containing
metabolites, and other metabolites such as lactate, fumarate, and
succinate. Compared with controls, mice administered dietary BNF exhibited
significantly reduced glucose in the liver (Figure B); however, no significant changes were
observed in the Ahr 50
ppm group (Figure E). Serum metabolomic analysis revealed that the 0.5 ppm BNF-fed
mice caused a significant reduction in high-density lipoprotein (HDL),
phosphorylcholine (PC), and glycerylphosphorylcholine (GPC) levels
compared to control (Figure C), while 0.5 ppm fed mice had a significant increase very
low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL; Figure C). The serum results
from Ahr 50 ppm group
revealed no significant differences (Figure F).
Dietary BNF Alters Expression Profile of
Mammary Gland Genes
Associated Glucose and Amino Acid Metabolic Pathways
In order
to monitor some of the transcriptional responses associated with BNF
treatment that might further support the metabolomics data, we measured
the expression of several key genes including glucose transporter
1 (Glut1) and solute carrier family
1 member 4 (Slc1a4) which are involved in
glucose and amino acid transport, respectively. BNF exposure caused
a significant decrease in Glut1 and Slc1a4 in BNF fed Ahrb mouse mammary gland
tissue (Figure A,B).
The results from the 50 ppm BNF fed Ahr group revealed no significant differences.
Figure 5
BNF suppresses
glucose and amino acid transporters in mammary gland
during lactation. Female Ahr (n = 6) and Ahr (n = 4) mice thoracic mammary glands
were removed for RNA extraction. Gland mRNA expression was measured
by QPCR to assess (A) Glut1 and (B) Slc1a4. All experimental data were analyzed using either one-way ANOVA
followed by Tukey’s post analysis or unpaired t-test. Results are shown as normalized mean ± SEM *P ≤ 0.05, **P≤ 0.01.
BNF suppresses
glucose and amino acid transporters in mammary gland
during lactation. Female Ahr (n = 6) and Ahr (n = 4) mice thoracic mammary glands
were removed for RNA extraction. Gland mRNA expression was measured
by QPCR to assess (A) Glut1 and (B) Slc1a4. All experimental data were analyzed using either one-way ANOVA
followed by Tukey’s post analysis or unpaired t-test. Results are shown as normalized mean ± SEM *P ≤ 0.05, **P≤ 0.01.
Discussion
The mammary gland is
one of the most active metabolic organs. Few
studies have sought to characterize the metabolic perturbations associated
with AHR mediated mammary gland dysregulation. The mammary gland,
liver, and serum metabolome were monitored using 1H NMR-based
metabolomics. Our analyses revealed Ahr (high affinity) mice fed BNF had a significant decrease
in amino acid and glucose utilization, which could be due to decreased
glucose and amino acid transporter activity or to decreased release
of glucose and amino acids to the serum from the liver. Studies have
shown that glucose transport into the mammary epithelial cells and
their Golgi is facilitated by upregulation of Glut1 mRNA during lactation.[27,28] Recent data also revealed
that during lactation that mammary glands had increased cellular concentrations
of amino acids (valine, leucine, isoleucine, alanine, and arginine).[29] Other groups have suggested that amino acids
are an important substrate for lipid synthesis at least in species
that produce milk with a very high lipid content, such as the mouse.[28,29] Our results reveal AHR activation causes a significant decrease
in Glut1 and Slc1a4 gene expression
in the mammary glands of BNF exposed dams. In addition, other studies
report TCDD significantly down regulated the expression levels of
the Glut isoforms 1 and 3.[30] Further after 24 h TCDD treatment, GLUT1 was no longer localized
in the plasma membrane of P19 cells.[30,31]BNF-mediated
AHR activation caused increase of the TCA intermediate
fumarate, suggesting decreased utilization and dysregulation of the
TCA cycle and energy production. A significant accumulation in aromatic
amino acids (tyrosine, phenylalanine, and histidine) in mammary gland
extracts suggested inhibited protein synthesis. Recent reports have
shown aromatic amino acids (e.g., tryptophan) in culture medium are
metabolized to ligands of AHR.[32] Our results
suggest AHR may play a role in the metabolism of amino acids during
lactation in the mammary gland. Results presented here revealed a
significant accumulation of BCAAs, suggesting decreased utilization
and possible metabolic dysregulation. However, it is likely this BCAAs
accumulation stems from protein synthesis dysregulation considering
that lactation increases the demand for protein synthesis.[33] Interestingly, we also noted that in the 50
ppm BNF-treated Ahr,
there was a significant increase in LDL/VLDL. Reports indicate that
indeed LDL can activate AHR,[34] that chronic,
high dose exposure to the potent AHR ligand TCDD can impact VLDL secretion
from the liver,[35] and that ARH activation
can exacerbate vascular inflammation in the ApoE-null
mouse.[36] These results suggest AHR may
play a part in lipid and energy metabolism in the lactation network
of the mouse and highlights that activation of AHR can lead to metabolic
dysregulation in lactating mammary glands and liver.Similar
to other studies using the extensively investigated pollutant
TCDD, our study suggests BNF interrupted the differentiation of the
mammary gland and its associated milk production.[10,12,37] However, we cannot exclude the possibility
that a BNF metabolite could also promote these changes. Studies have
shown that prenatal TCDD exposure can cause pups to gain significantly
less weight. However, it is unclear whether this is due to physiological
changes in the mammary of the dams or to the pups themselves. Future
studies to understand the physiologic effects of BNF on the pups directly
are warranted. Additionally, differences between mouse and humanAHR
activation should be assessed using humanized AHRmice.In the
current study, BNF impaired the production of milk protein
genes β-casein, Wap, and Lalba in both in vitro and in vivo systems.[13,14,38] Casein and whey protein, both
important milk proteins, are molecular markers for functional differentiation
in the mammary gland.[27] Genes for these
proteins are controlled by the lactogenic hormone prolactin, insulin,
hydrocortisone, cell–cell interactions, and cell-substratum
interactions.[28−30] Our data suggests that BNF impairs the production
of milk via the disruption of milk protein genes and subsequently
the reduction of their protein expression. Together these results
further support the idea that activation of the AHR can lead to deleterious
effects on mammary glands during lactation and strongly suggests more
detailed examination of AHR-responsive genes in the mammary gland
should be investigated.
Conclusions
Dietary exposure to
the AHR ligand BNF induced mammary gland dysfunction
in an Ahr-dependent manner. The data suggest, along
with previous reports, that activation of the AHR can lead to alterations
in several metabolic pathways, including perturbed TCA cycle and disrupted
carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism. 1H NMR analyses
provided a new perspective for elucidating mechanisms of mammary gland
toxicity; however, future studies will need to examine the metabolic
response of specific cell types contained within the mammary gland.
Further, characterization studies of AHR activators with more sensitive
analytical methods could lead to biomarker identification of mammary
toxicity during lactation. Our data has not completely pinpointed
whether the effects seen are due to specific signaling events or the
failure of the cells to differentiate. Overall, our findings highlight
the role of the AHR in energy metabolism in the mammary gland during
lactation.
Authors: Maria L Macheda; Elizabeth D Williams; James D Best; Mary E Wlodek; Suzanne Rogers Journal: Cell Tissue Res Date: 2002-11-15 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: Michael C Rudolph; James L McManaman; TzuLip Phang; Tanya Russell; Douglas J Kominsky; Natalie J Serkova; Torsten Stein; Steven M Anderson; Margaret C Neville Journal: Physiol Genomics Date: 2006-11-14 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Christoph F A Vogel; Gwendal Lazennec; Sarah Y Kado; Carla Dahlem; Yi He; Alejandro Castaneda; Yasuhiro Ishihara; Christian Vogeley; Andrea Rossi; Thomas Haarmann-Stemmann; Juliann Jugan; Hidetoshi Mori; Alexander D Borowsky; Michele A La Merrill; Colleen Sweeney Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-03-08 Impact factor: 7.561