Literature DB >> 20044593

Differential gene regulation by the human and mouse aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Colin A Flaveny1, Iain A Murray, Gary H Perdew.   

Abstract

The human aryl hydrocarbon receptor (hAHR) and mouse aryl hydrocarbon receptor (mAHR(b)) share limited (58%) transactivation domain (TAD) sequence identity. Compared to the mAHR(b) allele, the hAHR displays 10-fold lower relative affinity for prototypical ligands, such as 2,3,7,8 tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). However, in previous studies, we have demonstrated that the hAHR can display a higher relative ligand-binding affinity than the mAHR(b) for specific AHR ligands, such as indirubin. Each receptor has also been shown to differentially recruit LXXLL coactivator motif proteins and to utilize different TAD subdomains in gene transactivation. Using hepatocytes isolated from C57BL/6J mice (Ahr(b/b)) and AHR(Ttr) transgenic mice, which express hAHR protein specifically in hepatocytes, we investigated whether the hAHR and mAHR(b) differentially regulate genes. DNA microarray and quantitative PCR analysis of Ahr(b/b) and AHR(Ttr) primary mouse hepatocytes treated with 10nM TCDD revealed that a number of established AHR target genes such as Cyp1a1 and Cyp1b1 are significantly induced by both receptors. Remarkably, of the 1752 genes induced by mAHR(b) and 1186 genes induced by hAHR, only 265 genes (approximately 18%) were significantly activated by both receptors in response to TCDD. Conversely, of the 1100 and 779 genes significantly repressed in mAHR(b) and hAHR hepatocytes, respectively, only 462 (approximately 49%) genes were significantly repressed by both receptors in response to TCDD treatment. Genes identified as differentially expressed are known to be involved in a number of biological pathways, including cell proliferation and inflammatory response, which suggest that compared to the mAHR(b), the hAHR may play contrasting roles in TCDD-induced toxicity and endogenous AHR-mediated gene regulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20044593      PMCID: PMC2840214          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  39 in total

Review 1.  The AH-receptor: genetics, structure and function.

Authors:  H I Swanson; C A Bradfield
Journal:  Pharmacogenetics       Date:  1993-10

2.  Analysis of the four alleles of the murine aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  A Poland; D Palen; E Glover
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 3.  Evidence for the role of the Ah receptor in response to dioxin.

Authors:  L S Birnbaum
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1994

4.  Characterization and strain distribution pattern of the murine Ah receptor specified by the Ahd and Ahb-3 alleles.

Authors:  A Poland; E Glover
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.436

5.  Correlation between toxicity and effects on intermediary metabolism in 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-treated male C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice.

Authors:  L W Weber; M Lebofsky; B U Stahl; S Smith; K K Rozman
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Dioxin binding activities of polymorphic forms of mouse and human arylhydrocarbon receptors.

Authors:  M Ema; N Ohe; M Suzuki; J Mimura; K Sogawa; S Ikawa; Y Fujii-Kuriyama
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-11-04       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Transcriptional activation by the mouse Ah receptor. Interplay between multiple stimulatory and inhibitory functions.

Authors:  Q Ma; L Dong; J P Whitlock
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-05-26       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Comparative acute lethality of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), 1,2,3,7,8-pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and 1,2,3,4,7,8-hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the most TCDD-susceptible and the most TCDD-resistant rat strain.

Authors:  R Pohjanvirta; M Unkila; J Tuomisto
Journal:  Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1993-07

Review 9.  Human exposure to dioxin.

Authors:  C C Travis; H A Hattemer-Frey
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1991-05-01       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  H-ras oncogene mutation spectra in B6C3F1 and C57BL/6 mouse liver tumors provide evidence for TCDD promotion of spontaneous and vinyl carbamate-initiated liver cells.

Authors:  M A Watson; T R Devereux; D E Malarkey; M W Anderson; R R Maronpot
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.944

View more
  45 in total

Review 1.  Ah receptor ligands and their impacts on gut resilience: structure-activity effects.

Authors:  Stephen Safe; Arul Jayaraman; Robert S Chapkin
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 2.  The Complex Biology of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor and Its Role in the Pituitary Gland.

Authors:  Robert Formosa; Josanne Vassallo
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.869

Review 3.  Indole and Tryptophan Metabolism: Endogenous and Dietary Routes to Ah Receptor Activation.

Authors:  Troy D Hubbard; Iain A Murray; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.922

4.  Genome-Wide Transcriptional Analysis Reveals Novel AhR Targets That Regulate Dendritic Cell Function during Influenza A Virus Infection.

Authors:  Anthony M Franchini; Jason R Myers; Guang-Bi Jin; David M Shepherd; B Paige Lawrence
Journal:  Immunohorizons       Date:  2019-06-17

Review 5.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands in cancer: friend and foe.

Authors:  Iain A Murray; Andrew D Patterson; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 6.  Regulatory pathways for ATP-binding cassette transport proteins in kidney proximal tubules.

Authors:  Rosalinde Masereeuw; Frans G M Russel
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Binding studies using Pichia pastoris expressed human aryl hydrocarbon receptor and aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator proteins.

Authors:  Yujuan Zheng; Jinghang Xie; Xin Huang; Jin Dong; Miki S Park; William K Chan
Journal:  Protein Expr Purif       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 1.650

8.  Obesity and fatty liver are prevented by inhibition of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in both female and male mice.

Authors:  Benjamin J Moyer; Itzel Y Rojas; Joanna S Kerley-Hamilton; Krishnamurthy V Nemani; Heidi W Trask; Carol S Ringelberg; Barjor Gimi; Eugene Demidenko; Craig R Tomlinson
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  The antiandrogen flutamide is a novel aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand that disrupts bile acid homeostasis in mice through induction of Abcc4.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Gao; Cen Xie; Yuanyuan Wang; Yuhong Luo; Tomoki Yagai; Dongxue Sun; Xuemei Qin; Kristopher W Krausz; Frank J Gonzalez
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 5.858

10.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonism mitigates cytokine-mediated inflammatory signalling in primary human fibroblast-like synoviocytes.

Authors:  Tejas S Lahoti; Kaarthik John; Jarod M Hughes; Ann Kusnadi; Iain A Murray; Gowdahalli Krishnegowda; Shantu Amin; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.