Literature DB >> 29520642

Hemodynamic vascular biomarkers for initiation of paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysms using patient-specific computational fluid dynamic simulation based on magnetic resonance imaging.

Tomoya Watanabe1,2, Haruo Isoda3,4, Yasuo Takehara5,6, Masaki Terada7, Takehiro Naito8,9, Takafumi Kosugi10, Yuki Onishi11, Chiharu Tanoi9, Takashi Izumi12.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We performed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for patients with and without paraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms to evaluate the distribution of vascular biomarkers at the aneurysm initiation sites of the paraclinoid ICA.
METHODS: This study included 35 patients who were followed up for aneurysms using 3D time of flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and 3D cine phase-contrast MR imaging. Fifteen affected ICAs were included in group A with the 15 unaffected contralateral ICAs in group B. Thirty-three out of 40 paraclinoid ICAs free of aneurysms and arteriosclerotic lesions were included in group C. We deleted the aneurysms in group A based on the 3D TOF MRA dataset. We performed CFD based on MR data set and obtained wall shear stress (WSS), its derivatives, and streamlines. We qualitatively evaluated their distributions at and near the intracranial aneurysm initiation site among three groups. We also calculated and compared the normalized highest (nh-) WSS and nh-spatial WSS gradient (SWSSG) around the paraclinoid ICA among three groups.
RESULTS: High WSS and SWSSG distribution were observed at and near the aneurysm initiation site in group A. High WSS and SWSSG were also observed at similar locations in group B and group C. However, nh-WSS and nh-SWSSG were significantly higher in group A than in group C, and nh-SWSSG was significantly higher in group A than in group B.
CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated that nh-WSS and nh-SWSSG were good biomarkers for aneurysm initiation in the paraclinoid ICA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational fluid dynamics; Intracranial aneurysm; Magnetic resonance imaging; Wall shear stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29520642     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-018-2002-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  24 in total

1.  Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis.

Authors:  A M Malek; S L Alper; S Izumo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Youden Index and optimal cut-point estimated from observations affected by a lower limit of detection.

Authors:  Marcus D Ruopp; Neil J Perkins; Brian W Whitcomb; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.207

3.  Pulsatile flow in the human left coronary artery bifurcation: average conditions.

Authors:  X He; D N Ku
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Investigating the influence of haemodynamic stimuli on intracranial aneurysm inception.

Authors:  Haoyu Chen; Alisa Selimovic; Harry Thompson; Alessandro Chiarini; Justin Penrose; Yiannis Ventikos; Paul N Watton
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Semiautomated method for noise reduction and background phase error correction in MR phase velocity data.

Authors:  P G Walker; G B Cranney; M B Scheidegger; G Waseleski; G M Pohost; A P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysm initiation: the role of wall shear stress and spatial wall shear stress gradient.

Authors:  Z Kulcsár; A Ugron; M Marosfoi; Z Berentei; G Paál; I Szikora
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/american Stroke Association.

Authors:  E Sander Connolly; Alejandro A Rabinstein; J Ricardo Carhuapoma; Colin P Derdeyn; Jacques Dion; Randall T Higashida; Brian L Hoh; Catherine J Kirkness; Andrew M Naidech; Christopher S Ogilvy; Aman B Patel; B Gregory Thompson; Paul Vespa
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Newtonian viscosity model could overestimate wall shear stress in intracranial aneurysm domes and underestimate rupture risk.

Authors:  Jianping Xiang; Markus Tremmel; John Kolega; Elad I Levy; Sabareesh K Natarajan; Hui Meng
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 5.836

9.  Magnitude and role of wall shear stress on cerebral aneurysm: computational fluid dynamic study of 20 middle cerebral artery aneurysms.

Authors:  Masaaki Shojima; Marie Oshima; Kiyoshi Takagi; Ryo Torii; Motoharu Hayakawa; Kazuhiro Katada; Akio Morita; Takaaki Kirino
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Can temporal fluctuation in spatial wall shear stress gradient initiate a cerebral aneurysm? A proposed novel hemodynamic index, the gradient oscillatory number (GON).

Authors:  Yuji Shimogonya; Takuji Ishikawa; Yohsuke Imai; Noriaki Matsuki; Takami Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  2 in total

1.  Factors influencing blood flow resistance from a large internal carotid artery aneurysm revealed by a computational fluid dynamics model.

Authors:  Tasuku Imai; Takashi Izumi; Haruo Isoda; Kenta Ishiguro; Takashi Mizuno; Tetsuya Tsukada; Asuka Kropp; Masashi Ito; Masahiro Nishihori; Mamoru Ishida; Yosuke Tamari; Toshihiko Wakabayashi
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.131

2.  Case Report: Dynamic Changes in Hemodynamics During the Formation and Progression of Intracranial Aneurysms.

Authors:  Xiaodong Zhai; Yadong Wang; Gang Fang; Peng Hu; Hongqi Zhang; Chengcheng Zhu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.