PURPOSE: Approximately 20% of breast cancer survivors develop breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), and current therapies are limited. We compared acupuncture (AC) to usual care wait-list control (WL) for treatment of persistent BCRL. METHODS:Women with moderate BCRL lasting greater than six months were randomized to AC or WL. AC included twice weekly manual acupuncture over six weeks. We evaluated the difference in circumference and bioimpedance between affected and unaffected arms. Responders were defined as having a decrease in arm circumference difference greater than 30% from baseline. We used analysis of covariance for circumference and bioimpedance measurements and Fisher's exact to determine the proportion of responders. RESULTS: Among 82 patients, 73 (89%) were evaluable for the primary endpoint (36 in AC, 37 in WL). 79 (96%) patients received lymphedema treatment before enrolling in our study; 67 (82%) underwent ongoing treatment during the trial. We found no significant difference between groups for arm circumference difference (0.38 cm greater reduction in AC vs. WL, 95% CI - 0.12 to 0.89, p = 0.14) or bioimpedance difference (1.06 greater reduction in AC vs. WL, 95% CI - 5.72 to 7.85, p = 0.8). There was also no difference in the proportion of responders: 17% AC versus 11% WL (6% difference, 95% CI - 10 to 22%, p = 0.5). No severe adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Our acupuncture protocol appeared to be safe and well tolerated. However, it did not significantly reduce BCRL in pretreated patients receiving concurrent lymphedema treatment. This regimen does not improve upon conventional lymphedema treatment for breast cancer survivors with persistent BCRL.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Approximately 20% of breast cancer survivors develop breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), and current therapies are limited. We compared acupuncture (AC) to usual care wait-list control (WL) for treatment of persistent BCRL. METHODS:Women with moderate BCRL lasting greater than six months were randomized to AC or WL. AC included twice weekly manual acupuncture over six weeks. We evaluated the difference in circumference and bioimpedance between affected and unaffected arms. Responders were defined as having a decrease in arm circumference difference greater than 30% from baseline. We used analysis of covariance for circumference and bioimpedance measurements and Fisher's exact to determine the proportion of responders. RESULTS: Among 82 patients, 73 (89%) were evaluable for the primary endpoint (36 in AC, 37 in WL). 79 (96%) patients received lymphedema treatment before enrolling in our study; 67 (82%) underwent ongoing treatment during the trial. We found no significant difference between groups for arm circumference difference (0.38 cm greater reduction in AC vs. WL, 95% CI - 0.12 to 0.89, p = 0.14) or bioimpedance difference (1.06 greater reduction in AC vs. WL, 95% CI - 5.72 to 7.85, p = 0.8). There was also no difference in the proportion of responders: 17% AC versus 11% WL (6% difference, 95% CI - 10 to 22%, p = 0.5). No severe adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Our acupuncture protocol appeared to be safe and well tolerated. However, it did not significantly reduce BCRL in pretreated patients receiving concurrent lymphedema treatment. This regimen does not improve upon conventional lymphedema treatment for breast cancer survivors with persistent BCRL.
Entities:
Keywords:
Acupuncture; BCRL; Breast cancer; Breast cancer-related lymphedema; Lymphedema
Authors: Marilyn L Kwan; Jeanne Darbinian; Kathryn H Schmitz; Rebecca Citron; Paula Partee; Susan E Kutner; Lawrence H Kushi Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2010-11
Authors: Judith O Hopkins; Jake Allred; Arti Hurria; Aminah Jatoi; Jacqueline M Lafky; Harvey Cohen; Clifford Hudis; Eric Winer; Jeanne Mandelblatt; Ann Partridge; Lisa Carey; Hyman B Muss Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-08-20 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Sarah A McLaughlin; Mary J Wright; Katherine T Morris; Gladys L Giron; Michelle R Sampson; Julia P Brockway; Karen E Hurley; Elyn R Riedel; Kimberly J Van Zee Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-10-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sarah A McLaughlin; Mary J Wright; Katherine T Morris; Michelle R Sampson; Julia P Brockway; Karen E Hurley; Elyn R Riedel; Kimberly J Van Zee Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-10-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Barrie R Cassileth; Kimberly J Van Zee; Yi Chan; Marci I Coleton; Clifford A Hudis; Sara Cohen; James Lozada; Andrew J Vickers Journal: Acupunct Med Date: 2011-06-18 Impact factor: 2.267
Authors: Noa Schwartz; Madhavi Latha S Chalasani; Thomas M Li; Zhonghui Feng; William D Shipman; Theresa T Lu Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2019-03-20 Impact factor: 7.561