PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node biopsy was adopted for the staging of the axilla with the assumption that it would reduce the risk of lymphedema in women with breast cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term prevalence of lymphedema after SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone and after SLNB followed by axillary lymph node dissection (SLNB/ALND). PATIENTS AND METHODS: At median follow-up of 5 years, lymphedema was assessed in 936 women with clinically node-negative breast cancer who underwent SLNB alone or SLNB/ALND. Standardized ipsilateral and contralateral measurements at baseline and follow-up were used to determine change in ipsilateral upper extremity circumference and to control for baseline asymmetry and weight change. Associations between lymphedema and potential risk factors were examined. RESULTS: Of the 936 women, 600 women (64%) underwent SLNB alone and 336 women (36%) underwent SLNB/ALND. Patients having SLNB alone were older than those having SLNB/ALND (56 v 52 years; P < .0001). Baseline body mass index (BMI) was similar in both groups. Arm circumference measurements documented lymphedema in 5% of SLNB alone patients, compared with 16% of SLNB/ALND patients (P < .0001). Risk factors associated with measured lymphedema were greater body weight (P < .0001), higher BMI (P < .0001), and infection (P < .0001) or injury (P = .02) in the ipsilateral arm since surgery. CONCLUSION: When compared with SLNB/ALND, SLNB alone results in a significantly lower rate of lymphedema 5 years postoperatively. However, even after SLNB alone, there remains a clinically relevant risk of lymphedema. Higher body weight, infection, and injury are significant risk factors for developing lymphedema.
PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node biopsy was adopted for the staging of the axilla with the assumption that it would reduce the risk of lymphedema in women with breast cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term prevalence of lymphedema after SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone and after SLNB followed by axillary lymph node dissection (SLNB/ALND). PATIENTS AND METHODS: At median follow-up of 5 years, lymphedema was assessed in 936 women with clinically node-negative breast cancer who underwent SLNB alone or SLNB/ALND. Standardized ipsilateral and contralateral measurements at baseline and follow-up were used to determine change in ipsilateral upper extremity circumference and to control for baseline asymmetry and weight change. Associations between lymphedema and potential risk factors were examined. RESULTS: Of the 936 women, 600 women (64%) underwent SLNB alone and 336 women (36%) underwent SLNB/ALND. Patients having SLNB alone were older than those having SLNB/ALND (56 v 52 years; P < .0001). Baseline body mass index (BMI) was similar in both groups. Arm circumference measurements documented lymphedema in 5% of SLNB alone patients, compared with 16% of SLNB/ALND patients (P < .0001). Risk factors associated with measured lymphedema were greater body weight (P < .0001), higher BMI (P < .0001), and infection (P < .0001) or injury (P = .02) in the ipsilateral arm since surgery. CONCLUSION: When compared with SLNB/ALND, SLNB alone results in a significantly lower rate of lymphedema 5 years postoperatively. However, even after SLNB alone, there remains a clinically relevant risk of lymphedema. Higher body weight, infection, and injury are significant risk factors for developing lymphedema.
Authors: Anton Haid; Roswitha Köberle-Wührer; Michael Knauer; Judit Burtscher; Heinz Fritzsche; William Peschina; Zerina Jasarevic; Maria Ammann; Klaus Hergan; Heinz Sturn; Gerhard Zimmermann Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: A Haid; T Kuehn; P Konstantiniuk; R Köberle-Wührer; M Knauer; R Kreienberg; G Zimmermann Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: Igor Langer; Ulrich Guller; Gilles Berclaz; Ossi R Koechli; Gabriel Schaer; Mathias K Fehr; Thomas Hess; Daniel Oertli; Lucio Bronz; Beate Schnarwyler; Edward Wight; Urs Uehlinger; Eduard Infanger; Daniel Burger; Markus Zuber Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: William E Burak; Scott T Hollenbeck; Emmanuel E Zervos; Karen L Hock; Lisa C Kemp; Donn C Young Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: J S Rietman; P U Dijkstra; J H B Geertzen; P Baas; J de Vries; W V Dolsma; J W Groothoff; W H Eisma; H J Hoekstra Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2004-10-15 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Umberto Veronesi; Giovanni Paganelli; Giuseppe Viale; Alberto Luini; Stefano Zurrida; Viviana Galimberti; Mattia Intra; Paolo Veronesi; Chris Robertson; Patrick Maisonneuve; Giuseppe Renne; Concetta De Cicco; Francesca De Lucia; Roberto Gennari Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-08-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Marilyn L Kwan; Jeanne Darbinian; Kathryn H Schmitz; Rebecca Citron; Paula Partee; Susan E Kutner; Lawrence H Kushi Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2010-11
Authors: Swapna Ghanta; Daniel A Cuzzone; Jeremy S Torrisi; Nicholas J Albano; Walter J Joseph; Ira L Savetsky; Jason C Gardenier; David Chang; Jamie C Zampell; Babak J Mehrara Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Ira L Savetsky; Jeremy S Torrisi; Daniel A Cuzzone; Swapna Ghanta; Nicholas J Albano; Jason C Gardenier; Walter J Joseph; Babak J Mehrara Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Mei R Fu; Deborah Axelrod; Amber A Guth; Francis Cartwright; Zeyuan Qiu; Judith D Goldberg; June Kim; Joan Scagliola; Robin Kleinman; Judith Haber Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 5.344