Hongjin Li1,2, Judith M Schlaeger1, Min Kyeong Jang2,3, Yufen Lin4, Chang Park5, Tingting Liu6, Min Sun7, Ardith Z Doorenbos2,3. 1. Department of Human Development Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 2. Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, University of Illinois Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 4. School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 5. Department of Population Health Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 6. Eleanor Mann School of Nursing, University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR, USA. 7. Department of Hematology and Oncology, Hillman Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Abstract
Introduction: Acupuncture has demonstrated effectiveness for symptom management among breast cancer survivors. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effect of acupuncture on treatment-related symptoms among breast cancer survivors. Methods: The authors searched PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE for relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of acupuncture for managing treatment-related symptoms published in English through June 2021. They appraised the quality of each article using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Criteria. The primary outcomes were pain, hot flashes, sleep disturbance, fatigue, depression, lymphedema, and neuropathy as individual symptoms. They also evaluated adverse events reported in acupuncture studies. Results: Of 26 selected trials (2055 patients), 20 (1709 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Acupuncture was more effective than control groups in improving pain intensity [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.60, 95% confidence intervals (CI) -1.06 to -0.15], fatigue [SMD = -0.62, 95% CI -1.03 to -0.20], and hot flash severity [SMD = -0.52, 95% CI -0.82 to -0.22]. The subgroup analysis indicated that acupuncture showed trends but not significant effects on all the treatment-related symptoms compared with the sham acupuncture groups. Compared with waitlist control and usual care groups, the acupuncture groups showed significant reductions in pain intensity, fatigue, depression, hot flash severity, and neuropathy. No serious adverse events were reported related to acupuncture intervention. Mild adverse events (i.e., bruising, pain, swelling, skin infection, hematoma, headache, menstrual bleeding) were reported in 11 studies. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that acupuncture significantly reduces multiple treatment-related symptoms compared with the usual care or waitlist control group among breast cancer survivors. The safety of acupuncture was inadequately reported in the included studies. Based on the available data, acupuncture seems to be generally a safe treatment with some mild adverse events. These findings provide evidence-based recommendations for incorporating acupuncture into clinical breast cancer symptom management. Due to the high risk of bias and blinding issues in some RCTs, more rigorous trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of acupuncture in reducing multiple treatment-related symptoms among breast cancer survivors.
Introduction: Acupuncture has demonstrated effectiveness for symptom management among breast cancer survivors. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effect of acupuncture on treatment-related symptoms among breast cancer survivors. Methods: The authors searched PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE for relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of acupuncture for managing treatment-related symptoms published in English through June 2021. They appraised the quality of each article using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Criteria. The primary outcomes were pain, hot flashes, sleep disturbance, fatigue, depression, lymphedema, and neuropathy as individual symptoms. They also evaluated adverse events reported in acupuncture studies. Results: Of 26 selected trials (2055 patients), 20 (1709 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Acupuncture was more effective than control groups in improving pain intensity [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.60, 95% confidence intervals (CI) -1.06 to -0.15], fatigue [SMD = -0.62, 95% CI -1.03 to -0.20], and hot flash severity [SMD = -0.52, 95% CI -0.82 to -0.22]. The subgroup analysis indicated that acupuncture showed trends but not significant effects on all the treatment-related symptoms compared with the sham acupuncture groups. Compared with waitlist control and usual care groups, the acupuncture groups showed significant reductions in pain intensity, fatigue, depression, hot flash severity, and neuropathy. No serious adverse events were reported related to acupuncture intervention. Mild adverse events (i.e., bruising, pain, swelling, skin infection, hematoma, headache, menstrual bleeding) were reported in 11 studies. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that acupuncture significantly reduces multiple treatment-related symptoms compared with the usual care or waitlist control group among breast cancer survivors. The safety of acupuncture was inadequately reported in the included studies. Based on the available data, acupuncture seems to be generally a safe treatment with some mild adverse events. These findings provide evidence-based recommendations for incorporating acupuncture into clinical breast cancer symptom management. Due to the high risk of bias and blinding issues in some RCTs, more rigorous trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of acupuncture in reducing multiple treatment-related symptoms among breast cancer survivors.
Entities:
Keywords:
acupuncture; breast cancer; meta-analysis; symptom; symptom cluster
Authors: Heather Greenlee; Katherine D Crew; Jillian Capodice; Danielle Awad; Donna Buono; Zaixing Shi; Anne Jeffres; Sharon Wyse; Wendy Whitman; Meghna S Trivedi; Kevin Kalinsky; Dawn L Hershman Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-03-25 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Ting Bao; Wanqing Iris Zhi; Emily A Vertosick; Qing Susan Li; Janice DeRito; Andrew Vickers; Barrie R Cassileth; Jun J Mao; Kimberly J Van Zee Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Weidong Lu; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Rachel A Freedman; Im Hee Shin; Nancy U Lin; Ann H Partridge; David S Rosenthal; Jennifer A Ligibel Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-10-14
Authors: Gary Deng; Andrew Vickers; Simon Yeung; Gabriella M D'Andrea; Han Xiao; Alexandra S Heerdt; Steven Sugarman; Tiffany Troso-Sandoval; Andrew D Seidman; Clifford A Hudis; Barrie Cassileth Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-12-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Chong Guan Ng; Salina Mohamed; Mee Hoong See; Faizah Harun; Maznah Dahlui; Ahmad Hatim Sulaiman; Nor Zuraida Zainal; Nur Aishah Taib Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 3.186