| Literature DB >> 29520337 |
Guangyang Yu1, Gang Liu1, Dongtang Yuan1, Jian Dai1, Yin Cui2, Xiaoming Tang1.
Abstract
AIM: Increasing evidence has shown that long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) ANRIL may function as oncogenes in various types of malignancies. However, there is still a lack of knowledge concerning its role in osteosarcoma (OS). In this study, we aimed to investigate the influence of ANRIL on cell proliferation and invasion of OS and to determine its association with clinicopathological features of the patients.Entities:
Keywords: AKT; ANRIL; Long noncoding RNA; Osteosarcoma
Year: 2018 PMID: 29520337 PMCID: PMC5842283 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2018.02.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Bone Oncol ISSN: 2212-1366 Impact factor: 4.072
Fig. 1Overexpression of ANRIL was associated with the prognosis of osteosarcoma (OS). (a) Quantification real-time PCR analysis showed significantly higher ANRIL mRNA level in OS tissues than normal tissues. (p < 0.001) (b) Log-rank tests showed that patients with high ANRIL expression had significantly lower survival rate than patients with normal ANRIL expression.
Relationship between ANRIL expression and clinical features of osteosarcoma.
| Number | ANRIL expression | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal expression (n = 24) | High expression (n = 33) | |||
| Age (years) | ||||
| > 20 | 26 | 11 (45.8%) | 15 (45.5%) | 0.92 |
| ≤ 20 | 31 | 13 (54.2%) | 18 (54.5%) | |
| Mean ± S.D. | 41.5 ± 21.3 | 42.6 ± 22.5 | 0.85 | |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 35 | 13 (54.2%) | 22 (66.7%) | 0.33 |
| female | 22 | 11 (45.8%) | 11 (33.3%) | |
| Enneking stages | ||||
| I | 10 | 3 (12.5%) | 7 (21.2%) | 0.45 |
| IIA | 15 | 6 (25.0%) | 9 (27.3%) | |
| IIB | 24 | 10 (41.7%) | 14 (42.4%) | |
| III | 8 | 5 (20.8%) | 3 (9.1%) | |
| Tumor size (cm) | ||||
| > 5 | 27 | 9 (37.5%) | 18 (54.5%) | 0.21 |
| ≤ 5 | 30 | 15 (62.5%) | 15 (45.5%) | |
| Mean ± S.D. | 4.3 ± 1.7 | 5.7 ± 2.4 | 0.02 | |
| Tumor metastasis | ||||
| Presence | 25 | 7 (29.2%) | 18 (54.5%) | 0.06 |
| Absence | 32 | 17 (70.8%) | 15 (45.5%) | |
| Survival rate (%) | ||||
| Death | 21 | 5 (20.8%) | 16 (48.5%) | 0.03 |
| Survival | 36 | 19 (79.2%) | 17 (51.5%) | |
Fig. 2Knockdown of ANRIL induced cell apoptosis and inhibited cell proliferation of OS. (a) MNNG/HOS cells were transfected with lentivirus expressing siANRIL or shCtrl. qRT-PCR showed significantly decreased ANRIL expression in the cell lines transfected with siANRIL. (b) ANRIL-knockdown cells show significantly lower proliferation. (c) Flow cytometry showed an increased apoptosis rate of shANRIL-transfected cells as indicated by the representative diagrams of the annexin-V/PI assay. (d) MNNG/HOS cells transfected with the siANRIL or siCtrl were injected subcutaneously into the nude mice. At the 28th day after inoculation, mice of the siANRIL group were observed to have remarkably smaller tumor size than those in the control group (p < 0.05).
Fig. 3Knockdown of ANRIL inhibited the invasion of OS cells. Transwell assay showed a significantly reduced number of invasion cells for both MNNG/HOS and U2 OS cell lines. (a) For MNNG/HOS cell lines, the invasion rate of the control cells were 2.2 times higher than that of the transfected cells (p < 0.001). (b) For U2 OS cell lines, the invasion rate of the control cell were 2.5 times higher than that of the transfected cells (p < 0.001).
Fig. 4ANRIL may influence the function of OS cells through the AKT pathway. Western blot analysis was used to detect the expression of PI3K, AKT, p-AKT, and P-PI3k in both ANRIL-silenced and siCtrl-transfected MNNG/HOS cells. P-PI3k and p-AKT were confirmed to have remarkably lower protein expression in the ANRIL-silenced OS cells.