Literature DB >> 30087655

ANRIL: A lncRNA at the CDKN2A/B Locus With Roles in Cancer and Metabolic Disease.

Yahui Kong1, Chih-Heng Hsieh1, Laura C Alonso1.   

Abstract

The CDKN2A/B genomic locus is associated with risk of human cancers and metabolic disease. Although the locus contains several important protein-coding genes, studies suggest disease roles for a lesser-known antisense lncRNA encoded at this locus, called ANRIL. ANRIL is a complex gene containing at least 21 exons in simians, with many reported linear and circular isoforms. Like other genes, abundance of ANRIL is regulated by epigenetics, classic transcription regulation, splicing, and post-transcriptional influences such as RNA stability and microRNAs. Known molecular functions of ANRIL include in cis and in trans gene regulation through chromatin modification complexes, and influence over microRNA signaling networks. Polymorphisms at the ANRIL gene are linked to risk for many different cancers, as well as risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, bone mass, obesity and type 2 diabetes. A broad array of variable reported impacts of polymorphisms on ANRIL abundance, splicing and function suggests that ANRIL has cell-type and context-dependent regulation and actions. In cancer cells, ANRIL gain of function increases proliferation, metastasis, cell survival and epithelial-mesenchymal transformation, whereas ANRIL loss of function decreases tumor size and growth, invasion and metastasis, and increases apoptosis and senescence. In metabolic disease, polymorphisms at the ANRIL gene are linked to risk of type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, coronary artery calcium score, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Intriguingly, with the exception of one polymorphism in exon 2 of ANRIL, the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with atherosclerosis and diabetes are non-overlapping. Evidence suggests that ANRIL gain of function increases atherosclerosis; in diabetes, a risk-SNP reduced the pancreatic beta cell proliferation index. Studies are limited by the uncertain relevance of rodent models to ANRIL studies, since most ANRIL exons do not exist in mouse. Diverse cell-type-dependent results suggest it is necessary to perform studies in the relevant primary human tissue for each disease. Much remains to be learned about the biology of ANRIL in human health and disease; this research area may lead to insight into disease mechanisms and therapeutic approaches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANRIL; CDKN2A; CDKN2B; cancer; diabetes; long noncoding RNA; metabolic disease; pancreatic islet

Year:  2018        PMID: 30087655      PMCID: PMC6066557          DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)        ISSN: 1664-2392            Impact factor:   5.555


Introduction

The discovery of functional noncoding RNAs has opened a kaleidoscopic world of unanticipated mechanisms extending far beyond the DNA-RNA-protein paradigm; noncoding RNAs may in fact outnumber coding RNAs (1). Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been discovered throughout the genome; scientists are working to explore their functions in health and disease. The ANRIL lncRNA was first identified in a melanoma kindred with a large (403 kb) deletion at the CDKN2A/B locus (2). ANRIL has attracted broad attention because it is located at a genomic hotspot for disease heritability, the CDKN2A/B locus. Although protein coding genes at this locus have important well-studied roles in cell cycle regulation, data suggest that some locus disease-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) act through effects on ANRIL itself. Intriguingly, studies suggest ANRIL not only impacts the biology of cancer, but also has cell-type-specific roles in metabolic disease. Although ANRIL has been reviewed in the past (3, 4), knowledge has exponentially increased in recent years. Here we review advances in ANRIL SNPs, gene regulation, cell biology, and disease roles of ANRIL.

The CDKN2A/B locus

ANRIL, or CDKN2B-AS1, is located at the human CDKN2A/B locus at 9p21.3. This gene cluster, extending over a nearly 350 kb genomic region housed within a single topologically associated domain (TAD) (5), contains three protein coding genes and, antisense to them, the ANRIL lncRNA (Figure 1). The protein coding genes include S-methyl-5′-thioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP), CDKN2A, which encodes splice variants p16INK4A and p14ARF, and CDKN2B, which encodes p15INK4B (9, 10). MTAP lies at one end of the locus, 192 kb telomeric to the 5′ start of ANRIL. At the centromeric end of the locus, the ANRIL gene contains 19–21 reported exons over a 126 kb region. CDKN2A lies between MTAP and ANRIL, near the first exon of ANRIL; CDKN2B is located within the first intron of ANRIL, in an antisense direction. The proteins encoded by CDKN2A and CDKN2B are tumor suppressors with well-established roles in cell proliferation, apoptosis, senescence and aging (11, 12). p16INK4A and p15INK4B are cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors, inhibiting retinoblastoma phosphorylation by CDK4/6. The p14ARF protein, a splice variant of CDKN2A which due to a frame shift has no amino acid homology to the principal other CDKN2A splice variant, p16INK4A, modulates p53 activity. ANRIL is transcribed by RNA polymerase II and spliced into multiple linear and circular isoforms in a tissue-specific manner. In general, ANRIL roles, explored in detail below, include gene regulation in cis and in trans through interaction with polycomb repressive complex (PRC) histone modifiers, as well as RNA-RNA interactions such as microRNA (miRNA) sponge activity (3, 13). Known biological impact of ANRIL activities include modulation of proliferation, apoptosis and cellular adhesion pathways (14).
Figure 1

CDKN2A/B locus and ANRIL isoforms. (A) At the CDKN2A/B locus, the ANRIL lncRNA is antisense to the protein coding genes. The p15INK4B gene is contained within intron 1 of ANRIL. (B) To date, ANRIL has 21 reported exons. (C,D) Numerous linear (C) and circular (D) exons have been reported. Due to the discovery of additional exons, distal exons in some circular isoforms have been renumbered based on the current 21 reported exons. *Exons 15-16 refer to exons 14-15 in Holdt et al. (6). **Exon 16 refers to exon 14 in Sarkar et al. (7) and Burd et al. (8).

CDKN2A/B locus and ANRIL isoforms. (A) At the CDKN2A/B locus, the ANRIL lncRNA is antisense to the protein coding genes. The p15INK4B gene is contained within intron 1 of ANRIL. (B) To date, ANRIL has 21 reported exons. (C,D) Numerous linear (C) and circular (D) exons have been reported. Due to the discovery of additional exons, distal exons in some circular isoforms have been renumbered based on the current 21 reported exons. *Exons 15-16 refer to exons 14-15 in Holdt et al. (6). **Exon 16 refers to exon 14 in Sarkar et al. (7) and Burd et al. (8).

Evolution of the ANRIL gene

The evolutionary development of the human ANRIL gene has been studied by comparative analysis of the genomes of 27 organisms including non-mammalian vertebrates, non-placental mammals, non-primate placental mammals, and primates (15). ANRIL originated in ancestors of the Eutherian (placental) mammalian clade. Initially the gene contained only a few exons; over time, ANRIL underwent clade-specific evolution, adding exons in many mammals but losing exons in rodents. The full 21 exon gene is present only in simians. ANRIL genes contain many repeat elements, both intronic, and exonic; evidence suggests that transposon activity has mediated many of the observed evolutionary changes in exon presence or absence, location, sequence, conservation, and structure, as well as introduction of splice sites (15). Early ANRIL variants were likely not transcribed or functional (15). One hallmark of functional RNAs is splice signals at intron/exon boundaries. In simians, 191 intron/exon boundaries contained canonical splice signals, while 20 did not. In lower mammals, however, only about half of intron/exon junctions contained identifiable splice signals (15). This finding suggests that as ANRIL gained exons, and exon sequences became more conserved across species, it also increased the number of splice signals and gained functionality. Taken together, data suggest that ANRIL may be functional only in simians, and that functionality may have been introduced by transposon activity (15).

ANRIL isoforms and structure

With at least 21 exons (new exons discovered as recently as 2017 (7)), the ANRIL gene can potentially generate a large number of splice variants. In fact, many ANRIL isoforms have been reported (Figure 1) (16). Exon numbering has changed over time as new exons were discovered. Studies observe multiple isoforms in any given cell type, mostly at low abundance. A different range of isoforms may be identified from one cell type to another, but tissue-dependent isoform expression in primary cells or tissues has not yet been comprehensively quantified using the same reagents and techniques. Intriguingly, many studies have now identified both linear and circular ANRIL isoforms (6–8). The longest open reading frame identified in any ANRIL variant is 86 codons, supporting the concept that functionality of this gene is through RNA activity (16).

Linear and circular isoforms

Many conventional linear polyadenylated ANRIL isoforms are detected in different cell types. Circular ANRIL (circANRIL) isoforms, without polyadenylation, have also been described. Circular RNAs, which are formed by “back-splicing” in which a downstream splice donor site is joined to an upstream splice acceptor site, were discovered in 2012 to be a broadly occurring phenomenon across developmental stages and tissues, arising from at least 14% of human transcribed genes (17, 18). CircRNAs enjoy distinct properties from linear RNAs, including, in general, enhanced stability and longevity, cytoplasmic localization, and lack of translation (although if an IRES is engineered, circRNAs can support translation) (19). Traditional PCR using antisense-oriented primers cannot distinguish between linear and circular isoforms; other methodology, such as PCR using “outward-facing” primers directed away from each other, detection of specific exon-exon junctions, or protection from RNAse R digestion can quantify circular RNAs. Careful examination of melanoma cell lines showed that the abundance of individual ANRIL exons is non-uniform, supporting the presence of different isoforms (7). In both transformed cell lines and in human brain derived cells, abundance of ANRIL exons was lower than exons from locus protein-coding genes CDKN2A and CDKN2B (8). Linear isoforms tend to include proximal exons (1-2), whereas isoforms with only central exons (4-16) are more likely to be circular (8). In melanoma cells, proximal exons (exon 1 and exon 5-6) were more highly expressed than distal exons. This suggests that short isoforms of ANRIL, which tend to include proximal exons, are more abundant than longer isoforms in this cell type (7). In human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and a monocyte cell line, four major groups of ANRIL transcripts were found, all with common proximal exons including exons 1, 5, and 6 but with different distal exons, of various lengths (8). Multiple circular ANRIL isoforms have been detected. A circANRIL isoform with an exon 14-5 head-to-tail junction was reported to be the predominant form in both an immortalized fibroblast cell line (8) and in a majority of melanoma cell lines (7). Other non-canonical back-spliced junctions observed in melanoma samples included exon 14-5, 7-4, 10-5, and 14-4 (7). The exons most commonly observed in circANRIL in melanoma cells were 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 13, and 14; in varied human cell types, the majority of circANRIL species were exon 5-6-7 containing (6). ANRIL exons 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 11, and 12 were rarely included in circular RNA products (8). In melanoma lines, no correlation was observed between abundance of linear and circANRIL (7). However, circANRIL expression was inversely correlated with linear ANRIL expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in a cardiovascular cohort (6). CircANRIL was found to be resistant to RNAse R digestion compared with linear ANRIL, and an actinomycin D time course confirmed enhanced stability of the 14-5 circANRIL isoform compared with linear isoforms (7, 8).

Secondary structure

Structure and function of lncRNAs is of high interest in the scientific community, given the increasing recognition of lncRNA roles in cancer and the normal biology of higher organisms. As such, prediction of lncRNA structures is an important computational challenge. One approach is to identify structural elements through comparison of related lncRNAs. The MONSTER tool was used to compare ANRIL to two lncRNAs with similar biological function: HOTAIR and COLDAIR (20). MONSTER identifies sequence-predicted secondary structure, such as regions likely to be single stranded RNA, double stranded RNA, hairpin loops, interior loops and bulges. Comparing predictions of two lncRNAs with similar functions is proposed as a mechanism to identify structural motifs. When HOTAIR, COLDAIR, and ANRIL were compared, several common structures were identified, putative structural motifs related to their common function in epigenetic regulation, which could lead to a molecular understanding of mechanism of action in future studies (20). Another study identified the region of ANRIL that interacts with CBX7, a polycomb repressor component; secondary structure analysis revealed hairpin structural motifs with significant binding affinity to CBX7. Fluorescence anisotropy suggested a ternary complex between a particular loop of ANRIL, CBX7 and a H3K27me3 methylated histone peptide (21).

Cellular localization

RNA localization impacts function. In melanoma cells, linear ANRIL species containing proximal (exon 1) and distal (exons 13b, 19) exons were predominantly found in the nucleus. However, middle exons (exons 5, 6, and 7), which are found in both linear and circANRIL, were observed in cytoplasmic fractions, suggesting that circANRIL species may be predominantly cytoplasmic (7). Nuclear localization suggests linear isoforms may be responsible for the known ANRIL function of regulating gene transcription via chromatin modulation (see below). Conversely, cytoplasmic localization suggests circANRIL forms may participate in post-transcriptional functions. In gastric (22), prostate (21), and urothelial (23) cancer cells, ANRIL was predominantly nuclear. In a beautiful high-resolution analysis of single-molecule lncRNA localization, ANRIL was found to be mostly localized to cell nuclei, in one or several bright foci. Like other lncRNAs analyzed, ANRIL nuclei foci were lost in mitotic cells (24). Physiological stimuli that change ANRIL localization may provide clues as to ANRIL functions. Intriguingly, in a retinal cell line ANRIL isoforms were observed by fluorescence in situ hybridization to localize to the peri-nuclear cytoplasmic space. ANRIL abundance was induced by glucose, but ANRIL localization did not change with high glucose exposure (25). On the other hand, a study in HUVEC cells, using primers predicted to detect both linear and circular isoforms, found ANRIL to be mostly nuclear; nuclear ANRIL was increased after exposure to TNF-α (26). At least one study has used ANRIL as a nuclear positive control to test localization of other transcripts (27). Future cell type specific studies of ANRIL localization under basal, stimulated, and stress conditions may lead to clues as to ANRIL roles in tissue health and disease.

Regulation of ANRIL abundance

Abundance of ANRIL species is determined by promoter transcriptional activity, splicing decisions, and RNA stability (Figure 2). Like other genes, ANRIL promoter activity is influenced by epigenetic control and transcription factor occupancy. Intriguingly, epidemiological findings suggest that epigenetic regulation of ANRIL, through promoter methylation, has important long-lasting consequences for tissue function (29–31). As such, ANRIL regulation is one mediator of the impact of early life environmental signals on adult human health.
Figure 2

Summary of regulation and functions of the ANRIL lncRNA. (Left) Some of the known mechanisms by which ANRIL abundance is regulated, at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. On the (Right), a selection of known ANRIL cellular functions are depicted. We apologize for observations not included in this summary image. The ANRIL structural prediction in the center is of a common long-isoform of ANRIL, and was generated from Gruber et al. (28).

Summary of regulation and functions of the ANRIL lncRNA. (Left) Some of the known mechanisms by which ANRIL abundance is regulated, at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. On the (Right), a selection of known ANRIL cellular functions are depicted. We apologize for observations not included in this summary image. The ANRIL structural prediction in the center is of a common long-isoform of ANRIL, and was generated from Gruber et al. (28).

ANRIL promoter methylation

Epidemiological and experimental findings demonstrate that methylation of the ANRIL promoter region regulates ANRIL gene expression and has functional importance. The first exons of ANRIL and p14ARF are separated by only 300 bp, in head-to-head antisense orientation; the intergenic region between them is a bidirectional promoter (4, 32, 33). In silico analysis of ENCODE ChromHMM data (34) revealed that this region is enriched for both promoter and enhancer activity, and DNAse I hypersensitivity, across multiple cell types, suggesting this is a regulatory region. This region is bound by CTCF, usually considered to be a transcriptional repressor, insulating promoters from enhancer activity. Oddly, CTCF binding at the ANRIL promoter was associated with active-chromatin mark histone H3K4 trimethylation (35). CTCF binding, and ANRIL and p14ARF expression, were inhibited by methylation of local CpG islands and increased by demethylation. Knockdown of CTCF prevented the demethylation-induced expression of ANRIL and p14ARF, confirming that CTCF is a methylation-sensitive positive regulator of ANRIL promoter activity (35). Additional evidence supports the functional importance of CpG sites for ANRIL promoter activity, locus gene expression and transcription factor binding. Mutagenesis of the CpG sites affects both ANRIL and p14ARF promoter activity (29, 30). Methylation status of several CpG differentially methylated regions at ANRIL in umbilical cord tissues was positively associated with abundance of linear but not circular ANRIL, but inversely associated with p14ARF and p16INK4a expression (29). CpG methylation also affects other transcription factors binding at the ANRIL promoter to regulate downstream gene expression, such as interferon gamma, SMAD3/4 and ERα (29, 30). Methylation status of CpG islands around the p16INK4A transcription start site was also shown to coordinate transcription of ANRIL and p16INK4A in human cells (36). Given the multiple protein complexes binding across different CpG sites, and variable quantitative impact of individual CpG region mutagenesis on ANRIL isoforms and locus gene expression, regulation appears to be complex.

Transcription factors regulate ANRIL production

ANRIL expression is influenced by cellular processes such as genotoxic stress, tumorigenesis, senescence, and inflammation. Activity at the bidirectional promoter region upstream of both ANRIL and p14ARF genes is influenced by the critical cell cycle regulator E2F1 (32, 33). In response to the genotoxic stress of DNA damage, E2F1 transcriptionally activates ANRIL in an ATM-dependent manner (33, 37). In this case, ANRIL is thought to promote cell growth by suppressing locus INK-family inhibitors after DNA repair is complete, allowing re-entry into cell cycling (33). The ANRIL promoter was also responsive to E2F1 in cancer cells (32). In addition to E2F1, several known potent oncogenes regulate ANRIL expression in various cancers. In lung cancer, c-MYC binds to an E-box in the ANRIL promoter and induces ANRIL expression (38). In nasopharyngeal carcinoma, transcription factor SOX2 was shown to bind directly to the ANRIL promoter and activate transcription of ANRIL and its downstream effector β-catenin (39). In liver cancer, SP1 binds the ANRIL promoter and positively regulates ANRIL transcription (40). On the other hand, TET2, a tumor suppressor in human gastric cancer, binds to the promoter region of ANRIL and regulates expression of ANRIL as well as p16INK4a, p15INK4b, and p14ARF (41). Transcription regulation of ANRIL is involved not only in cell DNA damage and oncogenesis, but also in disparate processes such as cell senescence and inflammation. In senescence, oncogenic Ras was found to reduce expression of ANRIL (13, 21, 42). In inflammation, STAT1 activates the ANRIL locus in vascular endothelial cells has been reported; CAD-associated ANRIL SNP rs10757278, located in a known downstream enhancer region, disrupts the STAT1 binding site and modulates IFN-γ induced ANRIL expression via stimulation (43). Intriguingly, the binding of STAT1 at this enhancer exerts cell-type specific regulation of ANRIL expression: repression in lymphoblastoid cells lines, but activation in HUVEC cells (43). In sum, data support an important role for cell-type specific transcriptional regulation of the ANRIL lncRNA in a range of cellular processes and outcomes.

Regulation of ANRIL splicing

Cell type dependent variation in abundance of different ANRIL isoforms suggests that splicing may be a point of regulation (8, 44). Almost nothing is known about ANRIL splicing decisions. Disease-associated ANRIL gene polymorphisms have shed light on this process. In lymphocytes, the coronary artery disease (CAD) associated SNP rs10757278 (intron 12) correlates with abundance of certain circular (14-5 and 4-6) and linear (exon 1-2, but not 18-19, containing) isoforms (8). The rs10757278 A allele was found to inhibit skipping of exon 15, promoting circANRIL species ending in exon 14 (8). Mechanisms regulating ANRIL splicing require further study.

Post-transcriptional regulation

Determinants of ANRIL transcript longevity and stability remain uncertain, but miRNAs can participate. ANRIL, downregulated following Kaposi's sarcoma associated herpesvirus (KSHV) infection, contains multiple seed matches for KSHV miRNAs. Forced miRNA expression decreased ANRIL abundance, and miRNA pull-down experiments confirmed a direct interaction. In addition, KSHV latency associated proteins vFLIP and vCyclin also decreased ANRIL abundance, suggesting post-transcriptional miRNA-dependent and independent regulation (45).

Functions of the ANRIL lncRNA

Transcription regulation via chromatin modifying complexes

Many studies show that ANRIL functions in cells to regulate gene expression via chromatin modification. Acting in cis, ANRIL interacts with both PRC-1 and−2 to mediate epigenetic transcriptional repression of neighboring genes CDKN2A and CDKN2B, through mechanisms involving histone modification and chromatin remodeling (13, 21, 33). ANRIL interacts with PRC1 component CBX7 to recruit PRC1 to the p14ARF and p16INK4A loci, silencing the CDKN2A locus by H3K27-trimethylation (21). At CDKN2B, ANRIL was shown to recruit SUZ12, a subunit of the PRC2 (13). ANRIL also interacts with PRC-associated protein YY1 (46). Intriguingly, the structural conformation of the methyl-lysine binding pocket in the chromodomain of CBX7, which interacts with H3K27-trimethylation to cause chromatin compaction, is influenced by allosteric RNA-protein binding with ANRIL (47). However, despite this well-documented repression of other locus genes by ANRIL, a positive correlation between ANRIL (both short and long isoforms), CDKN2A and CDKN2B RNA abundance has been frequently reported, suggesting transcriptional co-regulation of these genes predominates in many tissues (8, 10, 14, 16, 44, 48–51). ANRIL also acts in a PRC1/2 dependent mechanism to repress distant genes in trans (32, 46). Trans regulation by ANRIL may be dependent on Alu motifs, which are found both in ANRIL transcripts and in the promoters of ANRIL target genes (46). This mechanism was shown to regulate the CARD8 gene in endothelial cells (52). Polycomb group proteins, which are highly enriched near Alu motifs across the genome, are recruited to target gene promoters upon ANRIL over-expression. In support of this concept, silencing ANRIL impacts expression of a large number of genes across the genome (14). Separate from chromatin modification, ANRIL is reported to regulate Wnt signaling by binding to SOX2, increasing transcriptional activity of the WNT/β-catenin pathway (39).

miRNA abundance and activity

ANRIL also influences gene expression via miRNA networks. ANRIL regulates miRNAs both at the epigenetic level, through regulation of miRNA transcription, and through direct binding to miRNAs, acting as a miRNA “sponge.” In gastric cancer cells, ANRIL epigenetically silences miR-99a/miR-449a through a PRC2 mechanism (22). In general, expression of ANRIL and its target miRNAs are negatively correlated in tissues and cell lines (22, 53–57). ANRIL has been described as having pro-oncogenic effects by sponging miRNAs (see below for more details). On the other hand, circANRIL containing exons 5-6-7 was found to lack miRNA sponge activity (6). Inhibition of miRNAs can reverse the effects of ANRIL knockdown.

Cellular outcomes of ANRIL activity

ANRIL has broad impacts on cell biology, including influence over proliferation, senescence, apoptosis, extracellular matrix remodeling, and inflammation (14). In cancer, ANRIL-miRNA interactions regulate networks of downstream targets of miRNAs, promoting an oncogenic role for ANRIL in cell proliferation, metastasis, invasion, radio-resistance, drug-induced cytotoxicity and apoptosis, involving many different signaling pathways (22, 53–57). Specifically, repression of cell cycle inhibitors p14ARF, p15INK4B, and p16INK4A increases proliferation, decreases senescence, and contributes to the DNA damage response (13, 21, 33). PRC-mediated epigenetic repression of Kruppel-like factor 2 (KLF2) influences proliferation and apoptosis (40, 58). Cooperation between ANRIL and PRC-associated YY1 increases TNF-alpha dependent inflammatory mediators (IL-6, IL-8) through NF-kB (26). ANRIL influences the cellular response to oxidative stress through a miR-125a regulation of MCL-1 (59). Circular ANRIL species were found to regulate ribosome biogenesis in vascular smooth muscle cells (6).

The ANRIL gene is associated with human disease

A primary driver of interest in ANRIL is the large body of genomic data linking the ANRIL gene with risk of human disease. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified many disease-associated SNPs in or near the ANRIL gene (60). The CDKN2A/B locus is remarkable for the large number of associated diseases, ranging from aging and frailty to cancer to metabolic disease. Perhaps surprisingly given the validated importance of the products of the CDKN2A and CDKN2B genes in cell biology, in some cases ANRIL expression shows stronger phenotype association than protein-coding CDKN2A/B locus genes (4, 48), linking ANRIL itself to a range of important human diseases.

ANRIL SNPs and disease risk

Studies indicate that SNPs in the ANRIL gene can impact ANRIL expression and function. The CDKN2A/B locus is associated with risk of cancer, atherosclerotic disease, type 2 diabetes, stroke, aneurysm, periodontitis, Alzheimer's disease, aging, frailty, glaucoma, endometriosis, multiple sclerosis, hypertension (10, 61). Reviewed here are only SNPs within or downstream of the ANRIL gene; broader CDKN2A/B locus disease associations have been reviewed previously (10, 62). Integrating information from published observations and the NCBI linkage disequilibrium database (63), we find that disease-associated SNPs in the ANRIL gene that modulate locus gene expression fall into approximately six groups (Table 1) defined loosely by linkage block and reported effects. Exceptions outnumber the rules, however; for nearly all groups there are reports of SNPs with different or even opposite effects. Summarized here is a generalized synopsis of the majority of reports. Group A SNPs, while located in ANRIL introns, generally impact CDKN2A/B but not ANRIL biology (48, 50, 64). All other SNP groups have reported impacts on ANRIL itself, but reports often describe conflicting direction of change. Some SNPs are reported to fall in enhancer regions (43, 49, 64) or to impact ANRIL splicing (8) or secondary structure (69, 74). The data are incomplete. A particular weakness of the field is that although tissue-specific effects are likely to determine how polymorphisms impact disease risk, in many cases the relevant primary tissue has not been tested.
Table 1

Disease associated SNPs in/near the ANRIL gene that modulate locus gene expression.

SNP groupLocation in ANRILSNPsDiseases associatedCell type testedImpactReferences
AIntron 1rs2811712 rs598664 rs3218018 rs3218005Frailty, cancers, diabetes, MI, CACBlood, leukocytesAltered CDKN2A and CDKN2B expression, but no change in ANRIL expression or not reported(14, 48, 50, 64, 65)
Intron 2rs662463
BIntron 1rs3217992 rs3218020CAD, glaucoma, cancerBloodRisk SNPs decrease ANRIL expression(14, 48)
CIntron 1rs1063192CAD, glaucoma, stroke, MI, diabetes, cancersBlood, lympho-blastoid cells, HUVEC, lymphocytes, isletsIncrease/decrease ANRIL expression. Possible enhancer. Disrupt miRNA binding site. Reduce beta cell proliferation index(14, 48, 6668)
Exon 2rs564398
Intron 2rs7865618
DIntron 1rs7044859 rs496892Cancers, CAD, Stroke, MI, CAC, glaucoma, cancersBlood, PBMC, lymphoblastoid cells, HUVEC, leukocytesExonic SNPs change predicted ANRIL free energy calculation, may impact secondary structure. Most intronic SNPs decrease ANRIL expression; possible predicted enhancers(4, 14, 43, 48, 50, 69, 70)
Exon 2rs10965215
Intron 3rs2151280
Exon 6rs10738605
Intron 6rs944799
EIntron 13rs10116277 rs6475606 rs10738607 rs10757274CAD, stroke, intracranial aneurysm, MI, endo- metriosis, hypertension, cancersBlood, PBMC, PBTL, VSMC, atherosclerotic plaque, primary vascular tissue, lympho-blastoid, HUVECIsoform-specific ANRIL up/downregulation. Experimentally tested enhancer regions. rs10757278 may impact ANRIL splicing, promoting circANRIL production(8, 14, 16, 43, 44, 48, 49, 51, 7173)
Intron 14rs10757278
Intron 18rs2383206 rs2383207
Intron 19rs1333045
Distal to exon 21rs10811656 rs1333049
FDistal to exon 21rs2383208 rs10811661Type 2 diabetesBlood, isletsDecrease/increase ANRIL expression, Predicted enhancer region(48, 68)

Groups A–F are defined loosely based on linkage disequilibrium (defined as LD>0.8 in Caucasian population in LDHap) and by predicted or tested impact on ANRIL expression or structure. Intron and exon numbers are based on 21 exons.

Disease associated SNPs in/near the ANRIL gene that modulate locus gene expression. Groups A–F are defined loosely based on linkage disequilibrium (defined as LD>0.8 in Caucasian population in LDHap) and by predicted or tested impact on ANRIL expression or structure. Intron and exon numbers are based on 21 exons.

Disease-associated SNPs may influence ANRIL abundance

There is no consistent global pattern with respect to SNP impact on ANRIL abundance. For most SNP groups, risk-SNPs are reported that both increase and decrease ANRIL levels in different studies. Variability may be related to differences in technique used to detect ANRIL that favor one isoform over others, cell type studied, acute and chronic biology and genetic origin of the cellular material studied, and of course the individual biology of each polymorphism. Most ANRIL SNPs fall in large linkage blocks, which are variable among different human genetic groups; in many cases the SNP tested may not be the causative SNP in the linkage block, and published linkage blocks may not apply to the material tested if not carefully matched by origin. It is entirely possible that all conflicting results are correct; for example, a CAD risk-SNP could increase pro-proliferative ANRIL isoforms in endothelial, macrophage or vascular smooth muscle cells to drive atherosclerosis, whereas a diabetes risk-SNP at the same position could decrease proliferative ANRIL isoforms in beta cells to limit beta cell mass. The complexity of the human system necessitates testing the relevant ANRIL isoforms in the relevant cell type, preferably in primary cells, in tissue- and disease-specific manner. A comprehensive review of all SNP effects is beyond the scope of this review. Some ANRIL located disease-associated SNPs impact both ANRIL expression and CDKN2A/CDKN2B expression (14, 48); others impact ANRIL but not CDKN2A or CDKN2B (14, 48, 60), and still others impact CDKN2A/CDKN2B but not ANRIL (48, 50, 64). Some SNPs are located within predicted or proven enhancer regions (10, 43, 48, 49, 64, 75) or miRNA binding sites (65, 66), providing possible mechanisms of cell type specific gene regulation.

Disease-associated SNPs may influence ANRIL structure or function

Beyond regulation of ANRIL transcription, polymorphisms could impact ANRIL function by influencing relative abundance of different isoforms through RNA splicing or stability, or through altering the secondary structure or interactions of any given isoform. Several studies have identified ANRIL isoform-specific effects (50, 53, 67, 71, 72); for example, four SNPs forming an atherosclerosis risk haplotype were associated with increased expression of some, but not all, ANRIL isoforms (44). SNPs may influence the relative abundance of linear compared to circular isoforms (8). Several SNPs are reported to impact ANRIL free energy of folding, resulting in a predicted change in secondary structure, with implications for function and stability (48, 69, 74).

ANRIL in cancer

ANRIL was initially identified in a kindred of familial melanoma-neural system tumor with a germ-line deletion of the entire CDKN2A/B locus (2). Although the CDKN2A/B locus is deleted or silenced in approximately 40% of human cancers, related to the tumor suppressive actions of CDKN2A and CDKN2B (76), ANRIL itself has pro-oncogenic properties. ANRIL is implicated in many malignancies, including cancers of the bladder (77), ovary (78, 79), lung (38, 58, 80–82), liver (40, 54, 83), stomach (22), breast (57, 84, 85), esophagus (86), nasopharyngeal cavity (39, 87, 88), thyroid (89), bone (90), cervix (91), colon (92), prostate (21, 56), glioma (55), and others (76). High tissue abundance of ANRIL in cancers is associated with aggressive clinicopathologic features such as high histological grade tumor size, advanced tumor-node-metastasis stage, and poor overall survival (22, 38, 40, 58, 78, 79, 83, 87, 89, 91–93). Certain SNPs within the ANRIL gene are associated with ANRIL and CDKN2A/B locus gene expression and clinical parameters (4, 48, 70, 94–96). ANRIL may be useful as a prognostic biomarker and a therapeutic target for clinical cancer management.

Molecular mechanisms of ANRIL in cancer

Accumulating evidence suggests that ANRIL participates in tumorigenesis by influencing cell proliferation, apoptosis and metastasis. Depletion or overexpression of ANRIL changes expression levels of many genes involved in proliferation, cellular adhesion and apoptosis (14, 32, 46). ANRIL overexpression promotes proliferation, migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transformation but inhibits cell apoptosis; ANRIL loss-of-function represses tumor size and growth rate, cell proliferation, migration, invasion, metastasis, and enhances apoptosis and senescence (22, 38, 55, 56, 58, 77, 80, 81, 84, 89–92). Suppression of ANRIL is required for Ras-induced senescence (13, 21, 42). High ANRIL levels are associated with resistance to chemotherapy, and ANRIL knockdown may promote chemosensitivity (37, 79, 88, 97–99). On the other hand, ANRIL mediated anti-oncogenic effects of phospholipase D in lung cancers (82). ANRIL may promote carcinogenesis through a number of mechanisms. Canonical ANRIL transcriptional mechanisms may play a role, such as by in cis suppression of the CDKN2A/CDKN2B tumor suppressor genes (80, 81, 100), or through PRC-mediated in trans gene regulation (40, 58, 80). ANRIL miRNA regulation has been implicated in cancers as well, including mechanisms involving let-7a and miR-125a in nasopharyngeal and oral carcinoma (56, 88, 101), miR-99a/miR-449a in gastric cancer (22), miR-122-5p in hepatocellular carcinoma (54), miR-186 in cervical cancer (91), and miR-199a in breast cancer (57), miR-34a in glioma (55), and miR-323 in pediatric medulloblastoma (102). Transcription factors affected by ANRIL in cancers include KLF2 (40, 58), SMAD (56, 86, 89) and β-catenin. ANRIL interacts with signal transduction pathways in cancers such as PI3K/AKT, p38 MAPK, TGF-β, ATM-E2F1, and MTOR (33, 55, 56, 86, 89, 99, 103). ANRIL can also drive cancer progression by increasing glucose uptake for glycolysis (87), through lymphangiogenesis via LYVE-1, VEFG-C, and VEGFR-3 (92), and through invasion and metastasis via MET and MMP3 (78). An intriguing but mostly unexplored phenomenon is breakpoint fusion transcripts including exons from ANRIL fused with exons from MTAP, a neighboring protein-coding gene, which were identified in 20% of screened melanoma cell lines (104).

ANRIL in metabolic disease

In addition to cancer, genome-wide association studies have repeatedly and confidently identified links between the genomic region containing ANRIL and risk of developing cardiometabolic disease, including type 2 diabetes and manifestations of atherosclerosis such as CAD and stroke (10, 62). This locus influences risk not only of classic type 2 (obesity-related) diabetes, but also with related syndromes such as gestational diabetes, transplant-associated diabetes, and cystic fibrosis related diabetes, but not risk of type 1 (autoimmune) diabetes (10). Although diabetes is a clinical risk factor for atherosclerosis, the genetic influence for these conditions at the ANRIL locus is mostly non-overlapping, with atherosclerosis SNPs located throughout the ANRIL gene, and T2D SNPs located distal to the last ANRIL exon (7). One exception is a SNP located in ANRIL exon 2, rs564398, which is associated with both T2D and CAD (105). Since CDKN2A/B locus genes are known for their roles in cell cycle regulation and cancer, and not metabolism, many questions remain as to how this locus impacts metabolic disease.

ANRIL and atherosclerotic disease

Since ANRIL locus SNPs influence risk of atherosclerosis, many studies have now tested whether ANRIL gene expression is related to atherosclerosis-associated diseases. In subjects with angiographically confirmed CAD in the Leipzig heart study, specific ANRIL isoforms were positively correlated with CAD risk SNP haplotype in PBMCs, whole blood, and atherosclerotic plaque tissue (44). In the Framingham heart study, ANRIL SNPs were associated with multiple CAD-related outcomes, and showed isoform-specific ANRIL correlation in leukocytes, with short isoforms predicted to contribute to CAD pathogenesis (50). CAD risk-SNPs may regulate the relative abundance of linear and circular ANRIL isoforms (8). Intriguingly, abundance of ANRIL in circulating plasma was positively correlated with in-stent restenosis (53), but in PBMCs harvested at the time of angioplasty/reperfusion, ANRIL levels were lower in subjects with myocardial infarction, but higher in subjects with older age, diabetes, hypertension. In this cohort, ANRIL levels in PBMCs improved model prediction of subsequent left ventricular dysfunction (106). ANRIL promoter methylation may mediate an epigenetic influence on future cardiac risk; higher CpG methylation at birth was associated with higher pulse wave velocity, a marker for increased arterial stiffness indicating greater cardiovascular risk, at 9 years of age (31). Mechanisms by which ANRIL impacts atherosclerotic disease remain debated. In aortic smooth muscle cells, knockdown of ANRIL using siRNA targeting exon 1 or exon 19 revealed altered gene expression networks impacting cell proliferation, apoptosis, extracellular matrix, and inflammation (14). Atherogenic gene expression networks were regulated by ANRIL via the Alu mechanism, in which Alu motifs target ANRIL to particular gene locations, recruiting PRC complexes and altering gene methylation status (46). ANRIL may impact risk of ischemic stroke by regulating the Caspase recruitment domain 8 (CARD8) gene in endothelial cells (52). A known CAD-associated miRNA, miR-92a, may mediate some ANRIL effects; ANRIL targets GATA2, MAP1B, and ARG1 were found to require miR-92a, placing this miRNA downstream of ANRIL for some atherogenic effects (69). Finally, ANRIL is related to inflammation: ANRIL is increased by pro-inflammatory factors NF-κ B and TNF-α in endothelial cells, and ANRIL was found to bind directly to the YY1 transcription factor to mediate TNF-a induction of cytokines IL-6 and IL-8 (26).

ANRIL and obesity, bone mass, and estrogen signaling

Although GWAS studies do not suggest a link between CDKN2A/B locus SNPs and obesity risk in adult populations, intriguingly, ANRIL may be a genomic site of environmental epigenetic influence on obesity. The ANRIL promoter contains CpG methylation sites that are differentially regulated across samples. In human tissues taken at birth, lower CpG methylation in infancy predicted higher fat mass at 6 years of age, as well as increased bone size, mineralization and density (29, 30). ANRIL promoter methylation was also negatively correlated with BMI in contemporaneous samples of peripheral blood from adolescents and in adipose tissue from adults (29). Methylation of these CpG sites increased tissue abundance of ANRIL RNA, in a mechanism that might include increased activity of an estrogen response element. Functional studies in a liposarcoma cell line showed that transcription factor binding to an adjacent ERE was enhanced by methylation, and estradiol increased ANRIL expression (29).

ANRIL and type 2 diabetes

Multiple SNPs in different linkage blocks at the CDKN2A/B locus are associated with T2D risk; evidence in human populations suggests these SNPs impact pancreatic islet mass or function (10). Despite the fact that the T2D risk SNPs are located in or near the ANRIL gene, the field has largely assumed the effect was mediated by the protein coding genes at the locus, due to extensive published work implicating p16INK4A in the regulation of beta cell mass (10). However, although studies have found no association between CDKN2A/B T2D SNPs and transcript level of p14ARF, p15INK4B, or p16INK4A in human islets (10, 107), an age-dependent positive association was identified between distal T2D risk-SNPs (group F in Table 1) and ANRIL expression (68). On the other hand, a T2D risk-SNP in ANRIL exon 2 (group C in Table 1) was associated with reduced ANRIL expression, again with no change in p14ARF, p15INK4B, or p16INK4A expression (14, 48); however, these studies were carried out in blood rather than islets. In human islets, this exon 2 SNP was shown to remove a CpG methylation site; risk allele was associated with reduced islet insulin content but no change in locus gene expression (108). Risk allele at this SNP was associated with impaired beta cell proliferation response to high glucose (68). In a study relevant to diabetic retinopathy, high glucose exposure increased ANRIL expression in human retinal epithelial cells (25). In ANRIL was found to increase expression of VEGF, a critical element of the neovascularization that is central to damage from retinopathy, via a mechanism involving PRC2 and miR200b (25, 109).

Summary

Studies suggest the ANRIL lncRNA influences risk of a number of diseases, including many types of cancer as well as metabolic disease. Current understanding of ANRIL biology indicates the primary function of this lncRNA is to regulate gene expression, both locally at CDKN2A/B as well as across the genome, via mechanisms including chromatin modulation, transcription factor binding, and miRNA regulation. Knowledge concerning ANRIL function in cancers is more solid and advanced than for metabolic tissues. Mechanisms by which SNPs influence ANRIL abundance remain uncertain and require more study; how DNA methylation regulates ANRIL in cancers also will benefit from more study. Much remains to be learned about the structural complexity of ANRIL; how the various identified linear and circular isoforms impact tissue biology to modulate disease risk is mostly unknown. There is an urgent need for deeper understanding of how ANRIL isoforms modulate cellular function in human organs and tissues, and to explore the differing roles of ANRIL in cancer and metabolic disease. Given the advent of RNA therapeutics, and the broad disease relevance of ANRIL, it is possible that these studies may lead to future disease prevention and treatment.

Author contributions

YK, C-HH, and LA wrote and revised the manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  109 in total

1.  CVD-associated non-coding RNA, ANRIL, modulates expression of atherogenic pathways in VSMC.

Authors:  Ada Congrains; Kei Kamide; Tomohiro Katsuya; Osamu Yasuda; Ryousuke Oguro; Koichi Yamamoto; Mitsuru Ohishi; Hiromi Rakugi
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Association between well-characterized lung cancer lncRNA polymorphisms and platinum-based chemotherapy toxicity in Chinese patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Wei-Jing Gong; Jing-Bo Peng; Ji-Ye Yin; Xiang-Ping Li; Wei Zheng; Ling Xiao; Li-Ming Tan; Di Xiao; Yi-Xin Chen; Xi Li; Hong-Hao Zhou; Zhao-Qian Liu
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Differential expression of long non-coding RNAs during genotoxic stress-induced apoptosis in HeLa and MCF-7 cells.

Authors:  Emre Özgür; Ufuk Mert; Mustafa Isin; Murat Okutan; Nejat Dalay; Ugur Gezer
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping.

Authors:  Suhas S P Rao; Miriam H Huntley; Neva C Durand; Elena K Stamenova; Ivan D Bochkov; James T Robinson; Adrian L Sanborn; Ido Machol; Arina D Omer; Eric S Lander; Erez Lieberman Aiden
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  CTCF is a DNA methylation-sensitive positive regulator of the INK/ARF locus.

Authors:  Carmen Rodriguez; Julie Borgel; Frank Court; Guy Cathala; Thierry Forné; Jacques Piette
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  The plasma lncRNA acting as fingerprint in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Xiaodong Hu; Jitao Bao; Zhen Wang; Zigang Zhang; Peijie Gu; Feng Tao; Di Cui; Weilong Jiang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-10-09

Review 7.  Neighboring gene regulation by antisense long non-coding RNAs.

Authors:  Victoria E Villegas; Peter G Zaphiropoulos
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Circular non-coding RNA ANRIL modulates ribosomal RNA maturation and atherosclerosis in humans.

Authors:  Lesca M Holdt; Anika Stahringer; Kristina Sass; Garwin Pichler; Nils A Kulak; Wolfgang Wilfert; Alexander Kohlmaier; Andreas Herbst; Bernd H Northoff; Alexandros Nicolaou; Gabor Gäbel; Frank Beutner; Markus Scholz; Joachim Thiery; Kiran Musunuru; Knut Krohn; Matthias Mann; Daniel Teupser
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Upregulation of SOX2-activated lncRNA ANRIL promotes nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell growth.

Authors:  Jian-Hui Wu; Jian-Ming Tang; Jia Li; Xiong-Wen Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Long noncoding RNA ANRIL indicates a poor prognosis of gastric cancer and promotes tumor growth by epigenetically silencing of miR-99a/miR-449a.

Authors:  Er-bao Zhang; Rong Kong; Dan-dan Yin; Liang-hui You; Ming Sun; Liang Han; Tong-peng Xu; Rui Xia; Jin-song Yang; Wei De; Jin fei Chen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-04-30
View more
  56 in total

1.  Splice variants of lncRNA RNA ANRIL exert opposing effects on endothelial cell activities associated with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Hyosuk Cho; Yabo Li; Stephen Archacki; Fan Wang; Gang Yu; Susmita Chakrabarti; Yang Guo; Qiuyun Chen; Qing Kenneth Wang
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  Multi-level regulation of PKCδI alternative splicing by lithium chloride.

Authors:  Deena Bader; Rekha S Patel; Ashley Lui; Chetna Thawani; Rea Rupani; Gitanjali Vidyarthi; Niketa A Patel
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  Integration of Epigenetic Mechanisms into Non-Genotoxic Carcinogenicity Hazard Assessment: Focus on DNA Methylation and Histone Modifications.

Authors:  Daniel Desaulniers; Paule Vasseur; Abigail Jacobs; M Cecilia Aguila; Norman Ertych; Miriam N Jacobs
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Regulatory and Functional Involvement of Long Non-Coding RNAs in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Mechanisms.

Authors:  Angelos Papaspyropoulos; Nefeli Lagopati; Ioanna Mourkioti; Andriani Angelopoulou; Spyridon Kyriazis; Michalis Liontos; Vassilis Gorgoulis; Athanassios Kotsinas
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 5.  A mechanistic view of long noncoding RNAs in cancer.

Authors:  Lauren Winkler; Nadya Dimitrova
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 9.349

Review 6.  [Research advance of ANRIL on atherosclerosis by regulating cell proliferation and apoptosis].

Authors:  Juan Fang; Zhicheng Pan; Xiaogang Guo
Journal:  Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-05-25

7.  The Arabidopsis lncRNA ASCO modulates the transcriptome through interaction with splicing factors.

Authors:  Richard Rigo; Jérémie Bazin; Natali Romero-Barrios; Michaël Moison; Leandro Lucero; Aurélie Christ; Moussa Benhamed; Thomas Blein; Stéphanie Huguet; Céline Charon; Martin Crespi; Federico Ariel
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 8.  Epigenomic and Metabolomic Integration Reveals Dynamic Metabolic Regulation in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Alba Loras; Cristina Segovia; José Luis Ruiz-Cerdá
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 9.  Non-Coding RNAs in Kidney Diseases: The Long and Short of Them.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Moreno; Eya Hamza; Melania Guerrero-Hue; Sandra Rayego-Mateos; Cristina García-Caballero; Mercedes Vallejo-Mudarra; Laurent Metzinger; Valérie Metzinger-Le Meuth
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  The Role of N6 -Methyladenosine Modified Circular RNA in Pathophysiological Processes.

Authors:  Mei Tang; Yonggang Lv
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 6.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.