Literature DB >> 29518567

Automatic skull segmentation from MR images for realistic volume conductor models of the head: Assessment of the state-of-the-art.

Jesper D Nielsen1, Kristoffer H Madsen1, Oula Puonti2, Hartwig R Siebner3, Christian Bauer4, Camilla Gøbel Madsen4, Guilherme B Saturnino2, Axel Thielscher5.   

Abstract

Anatomically realistic volume conductor models of the human head are important for accurate forward modeling of the electric field during transcranial brain stimulation (TBS), electro- (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG). In particular, the skull compartment exerts a strong influence on the field distribution due to its low conductivity, suggesting the need to represent its geometry accurately. However, automatic skull reconstruction from structural magnetic resonance (MR) images is difficult, as compact bone has a very low signal in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Here, we evaluate three methods for skull segmentation, namely FSL BET2, the unified segmentation routine of SPM12 with extended spatial tissue priors, and the skullfinder tool of BrainSuite. To our knowledge, this study is the first to rigorously assess the accuracy of these state-of-the-art tools by comparison with CT-based skull segmentations on a group of ten subjects. We demonstrate several key factors that improve the segmentation quality, including the use of multi-contrast MRI data, the optimization of the MR sequences and the adaptation of the parameters of the segmentation methods. We conclude that FSL and SPM12 achieve better skull segmentations than BrainSuite. The former methods obtain reasonable results for the upper part of the skull when a combination of T1- and T2-weighted images is used as input. The SPM12-based results can be improved slightly further by means of simple morphological operations to fix local defects. In contrast to FSL BET2, the SPM12-based segmentation with extended spatial tissue priors and the BrainSuite-based segmentation provide coarse reconstructions of the vertebrae, enabling the construction of volume conductor models that include the neck. We exemplarily demonstrate that the extended models enable a more accurate estimation of the electric field distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for montages that involve extraencephalic electrodes. The methods provided by FSL and SPM12 are integrated into pipelines for the automatic generation of realistic head models based on tetrahedral meshes, which are distributed as part of the open-source software package SimNIBS for field calculations for transcranial brain stimulation.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electroencephalography; Forward modeling; Skull segmentation; Transcranial brain stimulation; Volume conductor model

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29518567     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  29 in total

1.  Comparative modeling of transcranial magnetic and electric stimulation in mouse, monkey, and human.

Authors:  Ivan Alekseichuk; Kathleen Mantell; Sina Shirinpour; Alexander Opitz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Development, validation, and pilot MRI safety study of a high-resolution, open source, whole body pediatric numerical simulation model.

Authors:  Hongbae Jeong; Georgios Ntolkeras; Michel Alhilani; Seyed Reza Atefi; Lilla Zöllei; Kyoko Fujimoto; Ali Pourvaziri; Michael H Lev; P Ellen Grant; Giorgio Bonmassar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Shamo: A Tool for Electromagnetic Modeling, Simulation and Sensitivity Analysis of the Head.

Authors:  Martin Grignard; Christophe Geuzaine; Christophe Phillips
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2022-03-10

4.  Uncertainty quantification of TMS simulations considering MRI segmentation errors.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Luis Gomez; Johann Guilleminot
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Comparative performance of the finite element method and the boundary element fast multipole method for problems mimicking transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

Authors:  Aung Thu Htet; Guilherme B Saturnino; Edward H Burnham; Gregory M Noetscher; Aapo Nummenmaa; Sergey N Makarov
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Automated 3D MRI rendering of the craniofacial skeleton: using ZTE to drive the segmentation of black bone and FIESTA-C images.

Authors:  Karen A Eley; Gaspar Delso
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Individualized tDCS modeling predicts functional connectivity changes within the working memory network in older adults.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Alejandro Albizu; Jessica N Kraft; Andrew O'Shea; Nicole R Nissim; Ayden L Dunn; Daniela Carballo; Michael P Gordon; Shreya Taank; Alex T Kahn; Cindy Hernandez; William M Zucker; Adam J Woods
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Regionally specific gray matter volume is lower in alcohol use disorder: Implications for noninvasive brain stimulation treatment.

Authors:  Daniel M McCalley; Colleen A Hanlon
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.928

9.  Weak rTMS-induced electric fields produce neural entrainment in humans.

Authors:  Elina Zmeykina; Matthias Mittner; Walter Paulus; Zsolt Turi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A reexamination of motor and prefrontal TMS in tobacco use disorder: Time for personalized dosing based on electric field modeling?

Authors:  Kevin A Caulfield; Xingbao Li; Mark S George
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 4.861

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.