Literature DB >> 29518202

Identification of redox imbalance as a prominent metabolic response elicited by rapeseed feeding in swine metabolome.

C Chen1, M Pérez de Nanclares2, J F Kurtz1, M P Trudeau3, L Wang1, D Yao1, M Saqui-Salces3, P E Urriola3, L T Mydland2, G C Shurson3, M Overland2.   

Abstract

Rapeseed (RS) is an abundant and inexpensive source of energy and AA in diets for monogastrics and a sustainable alternative to soybean meal. It also contains diverse bioactive phytochemicals that could have antinutritional effects at high dose. When the RS-derived feed ingredients (RSF) are used in swine diets, the uptake of these nutrients and phytochemicals is expected to affect the metabolic system. In this study, 2 groups of young pigs (17.8 ± 2.7 kg initial BW) were equally fed a soybean meal-based control diet and an RSF-based diet, respectively, for 3 wk. Digesta, liver, and serum samples from these pigs were examined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based metabolomic analysis to determine the metabolic effects of the 2 diets. Analyses of digesta samples revealed that sinapine, sinapic acid, and gluconapin were robust exposure markers of RS. The distribution of free AA along the intestine of RSF pigs was consistent with the reduced apparent ileal digestibility of AA observed in these pigs. Despite its higher fiber content, the RSF diet did not affect microbial metabolites in the digesta, including short-chain fatty acids and secondary bile acids. Analyses of the liver and serum samples revealed that RSF altered the levels of AA metabolites involved in the urea cycle and 1-carbon metabolism. More importantly, RSF increased the levels of multiple oxidized metabolites and aldehydes while decreased the levels of ascorbic acid and docosahexaenoic acid-containing lipids in the liver and serum, suggesting that RSF could disrupt redox balance in young pigs. Overall, the results indicated that RSF elicited diverse metabolic events in young pigs through its influences on nutrient and antioxidant metabolism, which might affect the performance and health in long-term feeding and also provide the venues for nutritional and processing interventions to improve the utilization of RSF in pigs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29518202      PMCID: PMC6140949          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  33 in total

Review 1.  Digestion and absorption of dietary protein.

Authors:  R H Erickson; Y S Kim
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 13.739

Review 2.  Rapeseed meal-glucosinolates and their antinutritional effects. Part 3. Animal growth and performance.

Authors:  R Mawson; R K Heaney; Z Zdunczyk; H Kozłowska
Journal:  Nahrung       Date:  1994

Review 3.  GABA and GABA receptors in the gastrointestinal tract: from motility to inflammation.

Authors:  Michelangelo Auteri; Maria Grazia Zizzo; Rosa Serio
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 7.658

4.  Dietary phenolic acids and derivatives. Evaluation of the antioxidant activity of sinapic acid and its alkyl esters.

Authors:  Alexandra Gaspar; Marta Martins; Paulo Silva; E Manuela Garrido; Jorge Garrido; Omidreza Firuzi; Ramin Miri; Luciano Saso; Fernanda Borges
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 5.279

5.  Anxiolytic-like effects of sinapic acid in mice.

Authors:  Byung Hoon Yoon; Ji Wook Jung; Jong-Ju Lee; Young-Wuk Cho; Choon-Gon Jang; Changbae Jin; Tae Hwan Oh; Jong Hoon Ryu
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 5.037

6.  Determination of Sinapic Acid Derivatives in Canola Extracts Using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography.

Authors:  Rabie Khattab; Michael Eskin; Michel Aliani; Usha Thiyam
Journal:  J Am Oil Chem Soc       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 1.849

7.  Separation and characterization of the aldehydic products of lipid peroxidation stimulated by ADP-Fe2+ in rat liver microsomes.

Authors:  H Esterbauer; K H Cheeseman; M U Dianzani; G Poli; T F Slater
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1982-10-15       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 8.  From Dietary Fiber to Host Physiology: Short-Chain Fatty Acids as Key Bacterial Metabolites.

Authors:  Ara Koh; Filipe De Vadder; Petia Kovatcheva-Datchary; Fredrik Bäckhed
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Lactic acid bacteria convert glucosinolates to nitriles efficiently yet differently from enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Jane A Mullaney; William J Kelly; Tony K McGhie; Juliet Ansell; Julian A Heyes
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.279

10.  Influence of Rapeseed Meal on Growth Performance, Blood Profiles, Nutrient Digestibility and Economic Benefit of Growing-finishing Pigs.

Authors:  H B Choi; J H Jeong; D H Kim; Y Lee; H Kwon; Y Y Kim
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.509

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Measures Matter-Determining the True Nutri-Physiological Value of Feed Ingredients for Swine.

Authors:  Gerald C Shurson; Yuan-Tai Hung; Jae Cheol Jang; Pedro E Urriola
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Gut microbiota profiling in Norwegian weaner pigs reveals potentially beneficial effects of a high-fiber rapeseed diet.

Authors:  Özgün Candan Onarman Umu; Aud Kari Fauske; Caroline Piercey Åkesson; Marta Pérez de Nanclares; Randi Sørby; Charles McLean Press; Margareth Øverland; Henning Sørum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Serum metabolite markers of early Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in pigs.

Authors:  Meera Surendran Nair; Dan Yao; Chi Chen; Maria Pieters
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.683

4.  Rapeseed-based diet modulates the imputed functions of gut microbiome in growing-finishing pigs.

Authors:  Özgün Candan Onarman Umu; Liv Torunn Mydland; Margareth Øverland; Charles McLean Press; Henning Sørum
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.