Stephanie E Wallace1, Thomas D Bird1. 1. Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics (SEW), and Departments of Neurology and Medicine (TDB), University of Washington, Seattle.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Because of extensive clinical overlap among many forms of hereditary ataxia, molecular genetic testing is often required to establish a diagnosis. Interrogation of multiple genes has become a popular diagnostic approach as the cost of sequence analysis has decreased and the number of genes associated with overlapping phenotypes has increased. We describe the benefits and limitations of molecular genetic tests commonly used to determine the etiology of hereditary ataxia. RECENT FINDINGS: There are more than 300 hereditary disorders associated with ataxia. The most common causes of hereditary ataxia are expansion of nucleotide repeats within 7 genes: ATXN1, ATXN2, ATXN3, ATXN7, ATXN8, CACNA1A (spinocerebellar ataxia type 6), and FXN (Friedreich ataxia). Recent reports describing the use of clinical exome sequencing to identify causes of hereditary ataxia may lead neurologists to start their clinical investigation with a less sensitive molecular test providing a misleading "negative" result. SUMMARY: The majority of individuals with hereditary ataxias have nucleotide repeat expansions, pathogenic variants that are not detectable with clinical exome sequencing. Multigene panels that include specific assays to determine nucleotide repeat lengths should be considered first in individuals with hereditary ataxia.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Because of extensive clinical overlap among many forms of hereditary ataxia, molecular genetic testing is often required to establish a diagnosis. Interrogation of multiple genes has become a popular diagnostic approach as the cost of sequence analysis has decreased and the number of genes associated with overlapping phenotypes has increased. We describe the benefits and limitations of molecular genetic tests commonly used to determine the etiology of hereditary ataxia. RECENT FINDINGS: There are more than 300 hereditary disorders associated with ataxia. The most common causes of hereditary ataxia are expansion of nucleotide repeats within 7 genes: ATXN1, ATXN2, ATXN3, ATXN7, ATXN8, CACNA1A (spinocerebellar ataxia type 6), and FXN (Friedreich ataxia). Recent reports describing the use of clinical exome sequencing to identify causes of hereditary ataxia may lead neurologists to start their clinical investigation with a less sensitive molecular test providing a misleading "negative" result. SUMMARY: The majority of individuals with hereditary ataxias have nucleotide repeat expansions, pathogenic variants that are not detectable with clinical exome sequencing. Multigene panels that include specific assays to determine nucleotide repeat lengths should be considered first in individuals with hereditary ataxia.
Authors: Bart P van de Warrenburg; Meyke I Schouten; Susanne T de Bot; Sascha Vermeer; Rowdy Meijer; Maartje Pennings; Christian Gilissen; Michèl Aap Willemsen; Hans Scheffer; Erik-Jan Kamsteeg Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Martina Minnerop; Delia Kurzwelly; Holger Wagner; Anne S Soehn; Jennifer Reichbauer; Feifei Tao; Tim W Rattay; Michael Peitz; Kristina Rehbach; Alejandro Giorgetti; Angela Pyle; Holger Thiele; Janine Altmüller; Dagmar Timmann; Ilker Karaca; Martina Lennarz; Jonathan Baets; Holger Hengel; Matthis Synofzik; Burcu Atasu; Shawna Feely; Marina Kennerson; Claudia Stendel; Tobias Lindig; Michael A Gonzalez; Rüdiger Stirnberg; Marc Sturm; Sandra Roeske; Johanna Jung; Peter Bauer; Ebba Lohmann; Stefan Herms; Stefanie Heilmann-Heimbach; Garth Nicholson; Muhammad Mahanjah; Rajech Sharkia; Paolo Carloni; Oliver Brüstle; Thomas Klopstock; Katherine D Mathews; Michael E Shy; Peter de Jonghe; Patrick F Chinnery; Rita Horvath; Jürgen Kohlhase; Ina Schmitt; Michael Wolf; Susanne Greschus; Katrin Amunts; Wolfgang Maier; Ludger Schöls; Peter Nürnberg; Stephan Zuchner; Thomas Klockgether; Alfredo Ramirez; Rebecca Schüle Journal: Brain Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Zafar Iqbal; Siri L Rydning; Iselin M Wedding; Jeanette Koht; Lasse Pihlstrøm; Aina H Rengmark; Sandra P Henriksen; Chantal M E Tallaksen; Mathias Toft Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mario Van Poucke; Kimberley Stee; Laurien Sonck; Emmelie Stock; Leslie Bosseler; Jo Van Dorpe; Filip Van Nieuwerburgh; Dieter Deforce; Luc J Peelman; Luc Van Ham; Sofie F M Bhatti; Bart J G Broeckx Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Ashley K Yearwood; Shruthi Rethi; Karla P Figueroa; Ruth H Walker; Andrew K Sobering Journal: Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) Date: 2018-06-26
Authors: Nester Mitchell; Gaynel A LaTouche; Beverly Nelson; Karla P Figueroa; Ruth H Walker; Andrew K Sobering Journal: Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) Date: 2019-09-13
Authors: Dona Aboud Syriani; Darice Wong; Sameer Andani; Claudio M De Gusmao; Yuanming Mao; May Sanyoura; Giacomo Glotzer; Paul J Lockhart; Sharon Hassin-Baer; Vikram Khurana; Christopher M Gomez; Susan Perlman; Soma Das; Brent L Fogel Journal: Neurol Genet Date: 2020-05-20
Authors: Sergey G Shcherbak; Anton I Changalidi; Yury A Barbitoff; Anna Yu Anisenkova; Sergei V Mosenko; Zakhar P Asaulenko; Victoria V Tsay; Dmitrii E Polev; Roman S Kalinin; Yuri A Eismont; Andrey S Glotov; Evgeny Y Garbuzov; Alexander N Chernov; Olga A Klitsenko; Mikhail O Ushakov; Anton E Shikov; Stanislav P Urazov; Vladislav S Baranov; Oleg S Glotov Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2022-03-17 Impact factor: 4.141
Authors: Bart P C van de Warrenburg; Hans van Bokhoven; Marina P Hommersom; Ronald A M Buijsen; Willeke M C van Roon-Mom Journal: Stem Cell Rev Rep Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 5.739