Literature DB >> 29516669

MIMoSA: An Automated Method for Intermodal Segmentation Analysis of Multiple Sclerosis Brain Lesions.

Alessandra M Valcarcel1, Kristin A Linn1, Simon N Vandekar1, Theodore D Satterthwaite2, John Muschelli3, Peter A Calabresi4, Dzung L Pham5, Melissa Lynne Martin1, Russell T Shinohara1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for in vivo detection and characterization of white matter lesions (WMLs) in multiple sclerosis. While WMLs have been studied for over two decades using MRI, automated segmentation remains challenging. Although the majority of statistical techniques for the automated segmentation of WMLs are based on single imaging modalities, recent advances have used multimodal techniques for identifying WMLs. Complementary modalities emphasize different tissue properties, which help identify interrelated features of lesions.
METHODS: Method for Inter-Modal Segmentation Analysis (MIMoSA), a fully automatic lesion segmentation algorithm that utilizes novel covariance features from intermodal coupling regression in addition to mean structure to model the probability lesion is contained in each voxel, is proposed. MIMoSA was validated by comparison with both expert manual and other automated segmentation methods in two datasets. The first included 98 subjects imaged at Johns Hopkins Hospital in which bootstrap cross-validation was used to compare the performance of MIMoSA against OASIS and LesionTOADS, two popular automatic segmentation approaches. For a secondary validation, a publicly available data from a segmentation challenge were used for performance benchmarking.
RESULTS: In the Johns Hopkins study, MIMoSA yielded average Sørensen-Dice coefficient (DSC) of .57 and partial AUC of .68 calculated with false positive rates up to 1%. This was superior to performance using OASIS and LesionTOADS. The proposed method also performed competitively in the segmentation challenge dataset.
CONCLUSION: MIMoSA resulted in statistically significant improvements in lesion segmentation performance compared with LesionTOADS and OASIS, and performed competitively in an additional validation study.
Copyright © 2018 by the American Society of Neuroimaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automatic segmentation; lesion detection; logistic regression; multiple sclerosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29516669      PMCID: PMC6030441          DOI: 10.1111/jon.12506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuroimaging        ISSN: 1051-2284            Impact factor:   2.486


  30 in total

Review 1.  Multiple sclerosis: the role of MR imaging.

Authors:  Y Ge
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis.

Authors:  Dinggang Shen; Guorong Wu; Heung-Il Suk
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 9.590

3.  Subject-level measurement of local cortical coupling.

Authors:  Simon N Vandekar; Russell T Shinohara; Armin Raznahan; Ryan D Hopson; David R Roalf; Kosha Ruparel; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Theodore D Satterthwaite
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  brainR: Interactive 3 and 4D Images of High Resolution Neuroimage Data.

Authors:  John Muschelli; Elizabeth Sweeney; Ciprian Crainiceanu
Journal:  R J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.984

5.  fslr: Connecting the FSL Software with R.

Authors:  John Muschelli; Elizabeth Sweeney; Martin Lindquist; Ciprian Crainiceanu
Journal:  R J       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.984

6.  OASIS is Automated Statistical Inference for Segmentation, with applications to multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation in MRI.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Sweeney; Russell T Shinohara; Navid Shiee; Farrah J Mateen; Avni A Chudgar; Jennifer L Cuzzocreo; Peter A Calabresi; Dzung L Pham; Daniel S Reich; Ciprian M Crainiceanu
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 4.881

7.  A comparison of supervised machine learning algorithms and feature vectors for MS lesion segmentation using multimodal structural MRI.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Sweeney; Joshua T Vogelstein; Jennifer L Cuzzocreo; Peter A Calabresi; Daniel S Reich; Ciprian M Crainiceanu; Russell T Shinohara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Statistical estimation of white matter microstructure from conventional MRI.

Authors:  Leah H Suttner; Amanda Mejia; Blake Dewey; Pascal Sati; Daniel S Reich; Russell T Shinohara
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.881

9.  Location Sensitive Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Segmentation of White Matter Hyperintensities.

Authors:  Mohsen Ghafoorian; Nico Karssemeijer; Tom Heskes; Inge W M van Uden; Clara I Sanchez; Geert Litjens; Frank-Erik de Leeuw; Bram van Ginneken; Elena Marchiori; Bram Platel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Longitudinal multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation data resource.

Authors:  Aaron Carass; Snehashis Roy; Amod Jog; Jennifer L Cuzzocreo; Elizabeth Magrath; Adrian Gherman; Julia Button; James Nguyen; Pierre-Louis Bazin; Peter A Calabresi; Ciprian M Crainiceanu; Lotta M Ellingsen; Daniel S Reich; Jerry L Prince; Dzung L Pham
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2017-04-08
View more
  11 in total

1.  Automated Integration of Multimodal MRI for the Probabilistic Detection of the Central Vein Sign in White Matter Lesions.

Authors:  J D Dworkin; P Sati; A Solomon; D L Pham; R Watts; M L Martin; D Ontaneda; M K Schindler; D S Reich; R T Shinohara
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Brain and lesion segmentation in multiple sclerosis using fully convolutional neural networks: A large-scale study.

Authors:  Refaat E Gabr; Ivan Coronado; Melvin Robinson; Sheeba J Sujit; Sushmita Datta; Xiaojun Sun; William J Allen; Fred D Lublin; Jerry S Wolinsky; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 6.312

3.  Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation with Tiramisu and 2.5D Stacked Slices.

Authors:  Huahong Zhang; Alessandra M Valcarcel; Rohit Bakshi; Renxin Chu; Francesca Bagnato; Russell T Shinohara; Kilian Hett; Ipek Oguz
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2019-10-10

4.  A dual modeling approach to automatic segmentation of cerebral T2 hyperintensities and T1 black holes in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Alessandra M Valcarcel; Kristin A Linn; Fariha Khalid; Simon N Vandekar; Shahamat Tauhid; Theodore D Satterthwaite; John Muschelli; Melissa Lynne Martin; Rohit Bakshi; Russell T Shinohara
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.881

5.  TAPAS: A Thresholding Approach for Probability Map Automatic Segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Alessandra M Valcarcel; John Muschelli; Dzung L Pham; Melissa Lynne Martin; Paul Yushkevich; Rachel Brandstadter; Kristina R Patterson; Matthew K Schindler; Peter A Calabresi; Rohit Bakshi; Russell T Shinohara
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 4.881

6.  An improved algorithm of white matter hyperintensity detection in elderly adults.

Authors:  T Ding; A D Cohen; E E O'Connor; H T Karim; A Crainiceanu; J Muschelli; O Lopez; W E Klunk; H J Aizenstein; R Krafty; C M Crainiceanu; D L Tudorascu
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 7.  Automatic brain lesion segmentation on standard magnetic resonance images: a scoping review.

Authors:  Emilia Gryska; Justin Schneiderman; Isabella Björkman-Burtscher; Rolf A Heckemann
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Voxel-wise intermodal coupling analysis of two or more modalities using local covariance decomposition.

Authors:  Fengling Hu; Sarah M Weinstein; Erica B Baller; Alessandra M Valcarcel; Azeez Adebimpe; Armin Raznahan; David R Roalf; Timothy E Robert-Fitzgerald; Virgilio Gonzenbach; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Simon Vandekar; John A Detre; Kristin A Linn; Aaron Alexander-Bloch; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Russell T Shinohara
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 5.399

9.  Prediction of Conversion from CIS to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis Using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  H M Rehan Afzal; Suhuai Luo; Saadallah Ramadan; Manju Khari; Gopal Chaudhary; Jeannette Lechner-Scott
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  FLAIR2 improves LesionTOADS automatic segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in non-homogenized, multi-center, 2D clinical magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  M Le; L Y W Tang; E Hernández-Torres; M Jarrett; T Brosch; L Metz; D K B Li; A Traboulsee; R C Tam; A Rauscher; V Wiggermann
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.