Alessandra M Valcarcel1, Kristin A Linn1, Simon N Vandekar1, Theodore D Satterthwaite2, John Muschelli3, Peter A Calabresi4, Dzung L Pham5, Melissa Lynne Martin1, Russell T Shinohara1. 1. Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 3. Department of Biostatistics, The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. 4. Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. 5. Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for in vivo detection and characterization of white matter lesions (WMLs) in multiple sclerosis. While WMLs have been studied for over two decades using MRI, automated segmentation remains challenging. Although the majority of statistical techniques for the automated segmentation of WMLs are based on single imaging modalities, recent advances have used multimodal techniques for identifying WMLs. Complementary modalities emphasize different tissue properties, which help identify interrelated features of lesions. METHODS: Method for Inter-Modal Segmentation Analysis (MIMoSA), a fully automatic lesion segmentation algorithm that utilizes novel covariance features from intermodal coupling regression in addition to mean structure to model the probability lesion is contained in each voxel, is proposed. MIMoSA was validated by comparison with both expert manual and other automated segmentation methods in two datasets. The first included 98 subjects imaged at Johns Hopkins Hospital in which bootstrap cross-validation was used to compare the performance of MIMoSA against OASIS and LesionTOADS, two popular automatic segmentation approaches. For a secondary validation, a publicly available data from a segmentation challenge were used for performance benchmarking. RESULTS: In the Johns Hopkins study, MIMoSA yielded average Sørensen-Dice coefficient (DSC) of .57 and partial AUC of .68 calculated with false positive rates up to 1%. This was superior to performance using OASIS and LesionTOADS. The proposed method also performed competitively in the segmentation challenge dataset. CONCLUSION: MIMoSA resulted in statistically significant improvements in lesion segmentation performance compared with LesionTOADS and OASIS, and performed competitively in an additional validation study.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for in vivo detection and characterization of white matter lesions (WMLs) in multiple sclerosis. While WMLs have been studied for over two decades using MRI, automated segmentation remains challenging. Although the majority of statistical techniques for the automated segmentation of WMLs are based on single imaging modalities, recent advances have used multimodal techniques for identifying WMLs. Complementary modalities emphasize different tissue properties, which help identify interrelated features of lesions. METHODS: Method for Inter-Modal Segmentation Analysis (MIMoSA), a fully automatic lesion segmentation algorithm that utilizes novel covariance features from intermodal coupling regression in addition to mean structure to model the probability lesion is contained in each voxel, is proposed. MIMoSA was validated by comparison with both expert manual and other automated segmentation methods in two datasets. The first included 98 subjects imaged at Johns Hopkins Hospital in which bootstrap cross-validation was used to compare the performance of MIMoSA against OASIS and LesionTOADS, two popular automatic segmentation approaches. For a secondary validation, a publicly available data from a segmentation challenge were used for performance benchmarking. RESULTS: In the Johns Hopkins study, MIMoSA yielded average Sørensen-Dice coefficient (DSC) of .57 and partial AUC of .68 calculated with false positive rates up to 1%. This was superior to performance using OASIS and LesionTOADS. The proposed method also performed competitively in the segmentation challenge dataset. CONCLUSION:MIMoSA resulted in statistically significant improvements in lesion segmentation performance compared with LesionTOADS and OASIS, and performed competitively in an additional validation study.
Authors: Simon N Vandekar; Russell T Shinohara; Armin Raznahan; Ryan D Hopson; David R Roalf; Kosha Ruparel; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Theodore D Satterthwaite Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-03-05 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Elizabeth M Sweeney; Russell T Shinohara; Navid Shiee; Farrah J Mateen; Avni A Chudgar; Jennifer L Cuzzocreo; Peter A Calabresi; Dzung L Pham; Daniel S Reich; Ciprian M Crainiceanu Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2013-03-15 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Elizabeth M Sweeney; Joshua T Vogelstein; Jennifer L Cuzzocreo; Peter A Calabresi; Daniel S Reich; Ciprian M Crainiceanu; Russell T Shinohara Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Leah H Suttner; Amanda Mejia; Blake Dewey; Pascal Sati; Daniel S Reich; Russell T Shinohara Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Mohsen Ghafoorian; Nico Karssemeijer; Tom Heskes; Inge W M van Uden; Clara I Sanchez; Geert Litjens; Frank-Erik de Leeuw; Bram van Ginneken; Elena Marchiori; Bram Platel Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-07-11 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Aaron Carass; Snehashis Roy; Amod Jog; Jennifer L Cuzzocreo; Elizabeth Magrath; Adrian Gherman; Julia Button; James Nguyen; Pierre-Louis Bazin; Peter A Calabresi; Ciprian M Crainiceanu; Lotta M Ellingsen; Daniel S Reich; Jerry L Prince; Dzung L Pham Journal: Data Brief Date: 2017-04-08
Authors: J D Dworkin; P Sati; A Solomon; D L Pham; R Watts; M L Martin; D Ontaneda; M K Schindler; D S Reich; R T Shinohara Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Refaat E Gabr; Ivan Coronado; Melvin Robinson; Sheeba J Sujit; Sushmita Datta; Xiaojun Sun; William J Allen; Fred D Lublin; Jerry S Wolinsky; Ponnada A Narayana Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Alessandra M Valcarcel; Kristin A Linn; Fariha Khalid; Simon N Vandekar; Shahamat Tauhid; Theodore D Satterthwaite; John Muschelli; Melissa Lynne Martin; Rohit Bakshi; Russell T Shinohara Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Alessandra M Valcarcel; John Muschelli; Dzung L Pham; Melissa Lynne Martin; Paul Yushkevich; Rachel Brandstadter; Kristina R Patterson; Matthew K Schindler; Peter A Calabresi; Rohit Bakshi; Russell T Shinohara Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2020-05-16 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: T Ding; A D Cohen; E E O'Connor; H T Karim; A Crainiceanu; J Muschelli; O Lopez; W E Klunk; H J Aizenstein; R Krafty; C M Crainiceanu; D L Tudorascu Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2019-12-27 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Fengling Hu; Sarah M Weinstein; Erica B Baller; Alessandra M Valcarcel; Azeez Adebimpe; Armin Raznahan; David R Roalf; Timothy E Robert-Fitzgerald; Virgilio Gonzenbach; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Simon Vandekar; John A Detre; Kristin A Linn; Aaron Alexander-Bloch; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Russell T Shinohara Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 5.399
Authors: M Le; L Y W Tang; E Hernández-Torres; M Jarrett; T Brosch; L Metz; D K B Li; A Traboulsee; R C Tam; A Rauscher; V Wiggermann Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2019-07-05 Impact factor: 4.881