| Literature DB >> 29515518 |
Krzysztof Prusik1, Jakub Kortas1, Katarzyna Prusik1, Jan Mieszkowski2, Joanna Jaworska3, Wojciech Skrobot4, Marcin Lipinski5, Ewa Ziemann6, Jedrzej Antosiewicz7.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Different studies have demonstrated that regular exercise can induce changes in the lipid profile, but results remain inconclusive. Available data suggest that correction of vitamin D deficiency can improve the lipid profile. In this study, we have hypothesized that Nordic Walking training will improve lipid profile in elderly women supplemented with vitamin D.Entities:
Keywords: HDL; LDL; exercise; health training; physical fitness
Year: 2018 PMID: 29515518 PMCID: PMC5826219 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00042
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
12 weeks of Nordic Walking training had no effect on the body composition but had improved physical fitness in elderly women supplemented with vitamin D supplementation.
| Experimental group (exercise and supplement) | Control group | Supplemented group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline ( | After 12 weeks ( | After 6 month ( | Baseline ( | After 12 weeks ( | Baseline ( | After 12 weeks ( | |
| 69.2 ± 10.7 | 69.0 ± 11.1 | 66.5 ± 7.9 | 70.7 ± 11.4 | 71.2 ± 11.8 | 69.2 ± 10.1 | 70.3 ± 10.0 | |
| 26.0 ± 4.0 | 26.3 ± 4.0 | 25.6 ± 3.3 | 27.1 ± 3.7 | 27.5 ± 4.0 | 26.4 ± 3.5 | 26.8 ± 3.7 | |
| 24.8 ± 8.1 | 24.9 ± 8.6 | 23.3 ± 6.4 | 27.0 ± 7.4 | 27.1 ± 8.0 | 25.1 ± 7.3 | 25.9 ± 7.7 | |
| 35.3 ± 7.1 | 35.2 ± 7.7 | 34.5 ± 6.2 | 37.3 ± 6.0 | 37.0 ± 5.7 | 35.5 ± 6.7 | 36.1 ± 7.1 | |
| 44.2 ± 5.1 | 44.1 ± 4.9 | 43.2 ± 3.6 | 43.7 ± 5.6 | 44.1 ± 5.6 | 44.2 ± 5.0 | 44.6 ± 5.1 | |
| 32.5 ± 3.8 | 32.4 ± 3.6 | 31.7 ± 2.6 | 32.1 ± 4.1 | 32.4 ± 4.1 | 32.5 ± 3.7 | 32.7 ± 3.8 | |
| 21 ± 4 | 22 ± 3 | 22 ± 3 | 19 ± 5 | 20 ± 5 | 16 ± 3 | 17 ± 4 | |
| 26 ± 5 | 28 ± 6 | 29 ± 3 | 26 ± 7 | 26 ± 6 | 24 ± 5 | 23 ± 5 | |
| 7 ± 9 | 9 ± 9 | 6 ± 9 | 4 ± 10 | 4 ± 10 | 6 ± 10 | 4 ± 10 | |
| −1 ± 8 | 0 ± 8 | 1 ± 7 | −1 ± 7 | −1 ± 8 | −1 ± 7 | −2 ± 6 | |
| 4.72 ± 0.5 | 4.24 ± 0.4 | 4.56 ± 0.7 | 4.66 ± 0.7 | 4.61 ± 0.7 | 4.49 ± 0.9 | 4.61 ± 0.7 | |
Values are means (±SD). BMI, body mass index; Fat, fat mass; Fat%, percentage of body fat; FFM, free fat mass; TBW, total body water.
.
Hematological parameters in the experimental group.
| Variable | Baseline | After 12 weeks | CI– 95% | CI+ 95% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14.0 ± 0.9 | 13.7 ± 1.0 | 0.03 | −0.55 | −0.02 | |
| 30.1 ± 1.0 | 29.8 ± 1.1 | 0.00 | −0.52 | −0.13 | |
| 34.0 ± 0.8 | 33.5 ± 0.8 | 0.00 | −0.64 | −0.26 | |
| 41.1 ± 2.7 | 40.8 ± 2.6 | 0.42 | −1.09 | 0.47 | |
| 88.6 ± 3.1 | 88.9 ± 3.4 | 0.14 | −0.07 | 0.56 | |
| 4.6 ± 0.3 | 4.6 ± 0.3 | 0.28 | −0.14 | 0.04 |
Values are means (±SD). CI, confidence interval; Hb, hemoglobin; MCH, mean cell hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; HCT, hematocrit; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; RBC, erythrocytes. After 12-weeks of comparison between baseline and after the whole period of Nordic Walking training.
.
Changes in lipid profile in elderly women when Nordic Walking training is combined with vitamin D supplementation.
| Baseline ( | After 12 weeks of NW training and vit D supplementation ( | CI (−95%; +95%) | After 6 month without training and vit D supplementation ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 228.8 ± 36.0 | 207.7 ± 37.4 | 0.00 | (−34.2; −7.9) | 239.0 ± 50.3 | |
| 70.8 ± 19.3 | 67.6 ± 18.5 | 0.12 | (−7.4; 0.9) | 73.2 ± 20.5 | |
| 134.5 ± 29.6 | 121.1 ± 32.2 | 0.02 | (−24.5; −2.3) | 143.7 ± 47.4 | |
| 117.1 ± 55.6 | 94.6 ± 34.0 | 0.00 | (−36.4; −8.5) | 109.8 ± 46.8 | |
| 2.1 ± 0.6 | 1.9 ± 0.7 | 0.49 | (−0.2; 0) | 2.1 ± 0.8 | |
| 3.4 ± 0.8 | 3.2 ± 0.7 | 0.10 | (−0.4; 0) | 3.4 ± 0.9 | |
| 1.7 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 0.53 | (0; 0.2) | 1.7 ± 0.3 | |
| 1.9 ± 1.2 | 1.6 ± 0.8 | 0.09 | (0; 0.6) | 1.7 ± 1.0 | |
| 20.8 ± 7.7 | 38.4 ± 14.3 | 0.00 | (12.6; 22.6) | 23.6 ± 10.8 |
Values are means (±SD). TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein; TG, triglycerides.
.
Effect of vitamin D supplementation on lipid profile in elderly women.
| Control group | Supplemented group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline ( | After 12 weeks ( | Baseline ( | After 12 weeks ( | |
| 215.5 ± 41.6 | 235.0 ± 52.2 | 218.2 ± 57.3 | 212.2 ± 56.4 | |
| 73.2 ± 16.1 | 79.8 ± 16.3 | 70.1 ± 14.6 | 69.1 ± 13.3 | |
| 121.5 ± 38.4 | 133.9 ± 51.6 | 127.0 ± 54.9 | 121.0 ± 53.7 | |
| 103.7 ± 32.4 | 106.7 ± 31.7 | 107.0 ± 37.4 | 110.5 ± 44.8 | |
| 1.8 ± 0.7 | 1.8 ± 0.8 | 1.9 ± 1.2 | 1.8 ± 1.2 | |
| 3.1 ± 0.8 | 3.0 ± 0.9 | 3.2 ± 1.2 | 3.2 ± 1.3 | |
| 1.8 ± 0.3 | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 1.9 ± 0.4 | |
| 1.5 ± 0.7 | 1.4 ± 0.6 | 1.5 ± 0.6 | 1.6 ± 0.8 | |
| 24.2 ± 12.1 | 24.6 ± 10.9 | 18.1 ± 9.1 | 40.7 ± 12.1 | |
Values are means (±SD). TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein; TG, triglycerides.
.
.