William Kazanis1,2, Mary J Pugh1,2, Claudina Tami1, Joseph K Maddry3, Vikhyat S Bebarta4, Erin P Finley1,2, Don D McGeary1, David H Carnahan5,6, Jennifer S Potter1. 1. University of Texas Health Science Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229. 2. South Texas Veterans Health Care System, 7400 Merton Minter Boulevard, San Antonio, TX 78229. 3. En Route Care Research Center, 3698 Chambers Pass, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX 78234. 4. University of Colorado School of Medicine, Leprino Office Building, 12401 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045. 5. Defense Health Agency, 7700 Arlington Boulevard, Falls Church, VA, 22042. 6. San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, 3551 Roger Brook Dr., JBSA FT Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX 78234.
Abstract
Introduction: Between 2001 and 2009, opioid analgesic prescriptions in the Military Health System quadrupled to 3.8 million. The sheer quantity of opioid analgesics available sets the stage for issues related to misuse, abuse, and diversion. To address this issue, the Department of Defense implemented several directives and clinical guidelines to improve access to appropriate pain care and safe opioid prescribing. Unfortunately, little has been done to characterize changing patterns of opioid use in active duty service members (ADSM), so little is known about how combat operations and military health care policy may have influenced this significant problem. We examined changes in opioid use for ADSM between 2006 and 2014, compared trends with the civilian population, and explored the potential role of military-specific factors in changes in opioid use in the Military Health System. Materials and Methods: After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval, administrative prescription records (Pharmacy Data Transaction Records) for non-deployed ADSM were used to determine the number of opioid prescriptions dispensed each year and the proportion of ADSM who received at least one prescription per month between 2006 and 2014. Based on the observation and the literature, we identified December 2011 as the demarcation point (the optimal point to identify the downturn in opioid use) and used it to compare opioid use trends before and after. We used an autoregressive forecast model to verify changes in opioid use patterns before and after 2011. Several interrupted time series models examined whether military system-level factors were associated with changes in opioid use. Results: Between 2006 and 2014, 1,516,979 ADSM filled 7,119,945 opioid prescriptions, either in military treatment facilities or purchased through TRICARE. Both active duty and civilian populations showed signs of decreasing use after 2011, but this change was much more pronounced among ADSM. The forecast model showed a significant difference after 2011 between the projected and actual proportion of ADSM filling an opioid prescription, confirming 2011 as a point of divergence in opioid use. Interrupted time series models showed that the deflection point was associated with significant decreases. A significant increase of 0.261% in opioid prescriptions was seen for every 1,000 wounded in action service members in a given month. Troops returning from Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, or Operation New Dawn did not appear to influence the rates of use. Even after accounting for returning troops from Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn and wounded in action counts, the deflection point was associated with a lower proportion of ADSM who filled an opioid prescription, leading to a decrease of 1.61% by the end of the observation period (December 2014). Conclusion: After December 2011, opioid use patterns significantly decreased in both civilian and ADSM populations, but more so in the military population. Many factors, such as numbers of those wounded in action and the structural organization of the Military Health System, may have caused the decline, although more than likely the decrease was influenced by many factors inside and outside of the military, including policy directives and cultural changes.
Introduction: Between 2001 and 2009, opioid analgesic prescriptions in the Military Health System quadrupled to 3.8 million. The sheer quantity of opioid analgesics available sets the stage for issues related to misuse, abuse, and diversion. To address this issue, the Department of Defense implemented several directives and clinical guidelines to improve access to appropriate pain care and safe opioid prescribing. Unfortunately, little has been done to characterize changing patterns of opioid use in active duty service members (ADSM), so little is known about how combat operations and military health care policy may have influenced this significant problem. We examined changes in opioid use for ADSM between 2006 and 2014, compared trends with the civilian population, and explored the potential role of military-specific factors in changes in opioid use in the Military Health System. Materials and Methods: After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval, administrative prescription records (Pharmacy Data Transaction Records) for non-deployed ADSM were used to determine the number of opioid prescriptions dispensed each year and the proportion of ADSM who received at least one prescription per month between 2006 and 2014. Based on the observation and the literature, we identified December 2011 as the demarcation point (the optimal point to identify the downturn in opioid use) and used it to compare opioid use trends before and after. We used an autoregressive forecast model to verify changes in opioid use patterns before and after 2011. Several interrupted time series models examined whether military system-level factors were associated with changes in opioid use. Results: Between 2006 and 2014, 1,516,979 ADSM filled 7,119,945 opioid prescriptions, either in military treatment facilities or purchased through TRICARE. Both active duty and civilian populations showed signs of decreasing use after 2011, but this change was much more pronounced among ADSM. The forecast model showed a significant difference after 2011 between the projected and actual proportion of ADSM filling an opioid prescription, confirming 2011 as a point of divergence in opioid use. Interrupted time series models showed that the deflection point was associated with significant decreases. A significant increase of 0.261% in opioid prescriptions was seen for every 1,000 wounded in action service members in a given month. Troops returning from Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, or Operation New Dawn did not appear to influence the rates of use. Even after accounting for returning troops from Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn and wounded in action counts, the deflection point was associated with a lower proportion of ADSM who filled an opioid prescription, leading to a decrease of 1.61% by the end of the observation period (December 2014). Conclusion: After December 2011, opioid use patterns significantly decreased in both civilian and ADSM populations, but more so in the military population. Many factors, such as numbers of those wounded in action and the structural organization of the Military Health System, may have caused the decline, although more than likely the decrease was influenced by many factors inside and outside of the military, including policy directives and cultural changes.
Authors: Russ S Kotwal; Jeffrey T Howard; Jean A Orman; Bruce W Tarpey; Jeffrey A Bailey; Howard R Champion; Robert L Mabry; John B Holcomb; Kirby R Gross Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Richard C Dart; Hilary L Surratt; Theodore J Cicero; Mark W Parrino; S Geoff Severtson; Becki Bucher-Bartelson; Jody L Green Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-01-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robin L Toblin; Phillip J Quartana; Lyndon A Riviere; Kristina Clarke Walper; Charles W Hoge Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Janice Blanchard; Sarah B Hunter; Karen Chan Osilla; Warren Stewart; Jennifer Walters; Rosalie Liccardo Pacula Journal: Mil Med Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Erin P Finley; Suyen Schneegans; Claudina Tami; Mary Jo Pugh; Don McGeary; Lauren Penney; Jennifer Sharpe Potter Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Thomas Bein; David Zonies; Alois Philipp; Markus Zimmermann; Erik C Osborn; Patrick F Allan; Michael Nerlich; Bernhard M Graf; Raymond Fang Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Mayada Saadoun; Mark R Bauer; Rachel Sayko Adams; Krista Beth Highland; Mary Jo Larson Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Mark Trentalange; Tessa Runels; Andrew Bean; Robert D Kerns; Matthew J Bair; Abraham A Brody; Cynthia A Brandt; Ula Hwang Journal: Pain Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: Erin P Finley; Suyen Schneegans; Megan E Curtis; Vikhyat S Bebarta; Joseph K Maddry; Lauren Penney; Don McGeary; Jennifer Sharpe Potter Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 3.240