| Literature DB >> 29513759 |
Caroline Holm Nørgaard1, Lasse Hjort Jakobsen1,2, Andrew J Gentles3, Karen Dybkær1,2,4, Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly1,2,4, Julie Støve Bødker1,4, Alexander Schmitz1, Preben Johansen5, Tobias Herold6, Karsten Spiekermann6, Jennifer R Brown7,8, Josephine L Klitgaard7,8, Hans Erik Johnsen1,2,4, Martin Bøgsted1,2,4.
Abstract
Diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) involves blood cell counts, immunophenotyping, IgVH mutation status, and cytogenetic analyses. We generated B-cell associated gene-signatures (BAGS) based on six naturally occurring B-cell subsets within normal bone marrow. Our hypothesis is that by segregating CLL according to BAGS, we can identify subtypes with prognostic implications in support of pathogenetic value of BAGS. Microarray-based gene-expression samples from eight independent CLL cohorts (1,024 untreated patients) were BAGS-stratified into pre-BI, pre-BII, immature, naïve, memory, or plasma cell subtypes; the majority falling within the memory (24.5-45.8%) or naïve (14.5-32.3%) categories. For a subset of CLL patients (n = 296), time to treatment (TTT) was shorter amongst early differentiation subtypes (pre-BI/pre-BII/immature) compared to late subtypes (memory/plasma cell, HR: 0.53 [0.35-0.78]). Particularly, pre-BII subtype patients had the shortest TTT among all subtypes. Correlates derived for BAGS subtype and IgVH mutation (n = 405) revealed an elevated mutation frequency in late vs. early subtypes (71% vs. 45%, P < .001). Predictions for BAGS subtype resistance towards rituximab and cyclophosphamide varied for rituximab, whereas all subtypes were sensitive to cyclophosphamide. This study supports our hypothesis that BAGS-subtyping may be of tangible prognostic and pathogenetic value for CLL patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29513759 PMCID: PMC5841735 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193249
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Fig 1Quality assessment of the normal B-cell subsets.
a) Unsupervised clustering of surface marker genes in the six normal B-cell subsets. Heat map showing unsupervised hierarchical clustering of normal B-cell subsets based on their expression of the cell surface markers used for FACS. The color scale indicates relative gene expression: brown, low expression; blue, high expression. Color codes: pre-BI, purple; pre-BII, yellow; immature, green; naïve, turquoise; memory, orange; and plasma cells, blue. (b) Principal component analysis of the global gene expression (in total 39,115 genes) in normal B-cell subsets. 1st, 2nd, and 3rd principal components are shown and plotted against each other.
Subtype classification according to BAGS for CLL sample cohorts.
| Cohort | BAGS Subtypes n (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-BI | Pre-BII | Immature | Naive | Memory | Plasma cell | Unclassified | ||
| 68 | 12 (17.6) | 1 (1.5) | 5 (7.4) | 13 (19.1) | 23 (33.8) | 3 (4.4) | 11 (16.2) | |
| 124 | 15 (12.1) | 4 (3.2) | 13 (10.5) | 21 (16.9) | 49 (39.5) | 3 (2.4) | 19 (15.3) | |
| 83 | 11 (13.3) | 0 (0) | 6 (7.2) | 12 (14.5) | 38 (45.8) | 3 (3.6) | 13 (15.7) | |
| 127 | 18 (14.2) | 5 (3.9) | 5 (3.9) | 30 (23.6) | 43 (33.9) | 7 (5.5) | 19 (15.0) | |
| 112 | 14 (12.5) | 4 (3.6) | 7 (6.2) | 17 (15.2) | 51 (45.5) | 2 (1.8) | 17 (15.2) | |
| 318 | 58 (18.2) | 10 (3.1) | 16 (5.0) | 93 (29.2) | 78 (24.5) | 15 (4.7) | 48 (15.1) | |
| 62 | 8 (12.9) | 2 (3.2) | 0 (0.0) | 20 (32.3) | 20 (32.3) | 2 (3.2) | 10 (16.1) | |
| 130 | 13 (10.0) | 8 (6.2) | 8 (6.2) | 33 (25.4) | 42 (32.3) | 6 (4.6) | 20 (15.4) | |
| 1024 | 149 (14.6) | 34 (3.3) | 60 (5.9) | 239 (23.3) | 344 (33.6) | 41 (4.0) | 157 (15.3) | |
| 62–318 | 10.0–18.2 | 0.0–6.2 | 0.0–10.5 | 14.5–32.3 | 24.5–45.8 | 1.8–5.5 | 15.1–16.2 | |
aThe total number and
bfrequency range for each subtype is listed. Tests for significantly different distributions across data sets were calculated using Fisher’s exact test (P = 0.02).
BAGS assignment and time to treatment.
| Hazard ratio | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| | 1 | ||
| | 1.61 | 0.97 to 2.67 | 0.07 |
| | 3.67 | 1.82 to 7.38 | < 0.001 |
| | 1.67 | 0.89 to 3.12 | 0.11 |
| | 1.23 | 0.78 to 1.94 | 0.37 |
| | 0.80 | 0.32 to 2.01 | 0.64 |
| | 1.17 | 0.73 to 1.90 | 0.51 |
| | 1 | ||
| | 0.66 | 0.41 to 1.05 | 0.078 |
| | 0.53 | 0.35 to 0.78 | 0.002 |
| | 0.63 | 0.38 to 1.03 | 0.067 |
aBAGS assignments for individual BAGS subtypes and grouped as early (BI, BII), NA, or late (ME, PC) were associated to outcome (time to treatment) using univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. The Munich, IIDFI, and UCSD cohorts were used (n = 296).
Fig 2Analyses of the prognostic impact of subtyping according to BAGS on TTT in watch-and-wait CLL.
Cumulative incidence curves show years elapsed from the time of diagnostic GEP until the commencement of initial treatment. (a) All subtypes. (b) All subtypes divided as early (pre-), naïve, and late (post-germinal). Color codes as in Fig 1. Data from both the Munich, IIDFCI, and UCSD cohort were used (n = 296).
Associations between BAGS subtypes and patient characteristics, based on available clinical data.
| Pre-BI | Pre-BII | Immature | Naïve | Memory | Plasma Cell | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < = 65 years | 21 (13.8) | 10 (6.6) | 8 (5.3) | 44 (28.9) | 64 (42.1) | 5 (3.3) | 152 |
| >65 years | 19 (18.4) | 1 (1.0) | 4 (3.9) | 23 (22.3) | 50 (48.5) | 6 (5.8) | 103 |
| | |||||||
| Female | 21 (12.4) | 5 (3.0) | 18 (10.7) | 32 (18.9) | 83 (49.1) | 10 (5.9) | 169 |
| Male | 45 (17.2) | 10 (3.8) | 13 (5.0) | 68 (26.1) | 118 (45.2) | 7 (2.9) | 261 |
| A | 4 (8.7) | 1 (2.2) | 4 (8.7) | 14 (30.4) | 18 (39.1) | 5 (10.9) | 46 |
| B-C | 7 (25.0) | 1 (3.6) | 0 (0.0) | 12 (42.9) | 7 (25.0) | 1 (3.6) | 28 |
| No marker | 7 (15.6) | 2 (4.4) | 2 (4.4) | 8 (17.8) | 22 (48.9) | 4 (8.9) | 45 |
| Del13q | 16 (16.2) | 3 (3.0) | 4 (4.0) | 26 (26.3) | 44 (44.4) | 6 (6.1) | 99 |
| Tri12 | 7 (25.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (10.7) | 3 (10.7) | 14 (50) | 1 (3.6) | 28 |
| Del11q | 4 (21.1) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (10.5) | 9 (47.4) | 4 (21.1) | 0 (0.0) | 19 |
| Del17p | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (8.3) | 1 (8.3) | 9 (75.0) | 1 (8.3) | 12 |
| Positive | 24 (20.9) | 3 (2.6) | 14 (12.2) | 22 (19.1) | 48 (41.7) | 4 (3.5) | 115 |
| Negative | 20 (12.1) | 5 (3.0) | 15 (9.1) | 32 (19.4) | 89 (54.0) | 4 (2.4) | 165 |
| uIgVH | 35 (21.7) | 8 (5.0) | 20 (12.4) | 39 (24.2) | 53 (32.9) | 6 (3.7) | 161 |
| mIgVH | 31 (12.7) | 5 (2.0) | 15 (6.1) | 48 (19.7) | 135 (55.3) | 10 (4.1) | 244 |
Abbreviations: Del13q, deletion of 13q; Tri12, Trisomy; Del17p, deletion of 17p; Del11q, deletion of 11q; ZAP-70, zeta-chain-associated protein kinase 70; IgVH, immunoglobulin variable region heavy chain; mIgVH, mutated IgVH; uIgVH, unmutated IgVH.
Fig 3Drug resistance to rituximab or cyclophosphamide.
Box plots represent the estimated probability of resistance to (a) Rituximab in normal B-cell subsets, (b) Rituximab in all CLL samples, (c) Cyclophosphamide in normal B-cell subsets and (d) Cyclophosphamide in all CLL samples. The global P-value for equal mean resistance probability was < 0.001 in all four cases. Color codes as in Fig 1.