Literature DB >> 29511971

Impact of continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring on hemodynamic fluctuation during general anesthesia: a randomized controlled study.

Takashi Juri1, Koichi Suehiro2, Aya Kimura1, Akira Mukai1, Katsuaki Tanaka1, Tokuhiro Yamada1, Takashi Mori1, Kiyonobu Nishikawa1.   

Abstract

This study assessed the ability of a continuous non-invasive blood pressure (BP) monitoring system to reduce intra-anesthetic hemodynamic fluctuation compared with intermittent BP cuff measurement. Forty patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty under general anesthesia were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups (Control and CS group). BP management was performed using the same protocol with BP measured by intermittent BP cuff in the Control and that by continuous non-invasive BP monitoring in the CS group. We assessed the accuracy and precision of the continuous non-invasive BP monitoring compared with BP cuff measurement using Bland-Altman, four-quadrant plot, and polar-plot analyses. Additionally, the occurrence of hypotension and hypertention during general anesthesia was compared between the two groups. The continuous non-invasive BP monitoring showed excellent accuracy of - 1.1 ± 8.1 mmHg during surgery and an acceptable trending ability with a concordance rate of 95.1% according to the four-quadrant plot analysis and an angular concordance rate of 86.7% by polar-plot analysis. Hypotension was less common in the CS group during induction of anesthesia (p = 0.002) and surgery (p = 0.008). Hypertension occurred more frequently in the Control group during emergence from anesthesia (p = 0.037). The duration of hemodynamic stability (systolic BP 80-110% of baseline) intraoperatively was longer in the CS group than in the Control group (87.7 vs. 61.9%; p < 0.001). Accuracy and trending ability of the continuous non-invasive BP monitoring was clinically acceptable, and lead to hemodynamic stability and reduction of intra-anesthetic hypotension and hypertension intraoperatively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous blood pressure monitoring; Cuff measurement; General anesthesia; Hemodynamic fluctuation; Non-invasive

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29511971     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-018-0125-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  37 in total

1.  An Apgar score for surgery.

Authors:  Atul A Gawande; Mary R Kwaan; Scott E Regenbogen; Stuart A Lipsitz; Michael J Zinner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  The utility of intra-operative three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography for dynamic measurement of stroke volume.

Authors:  K Suehiro; K Tanaka; T Yamada; T Matsuura; T Funao; T Mori; K Nishikawa
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Comparison of noninvasive cardiac output measurements using the Nexfin monitoring device and the esophageal Doppler.

Authors:  Guo Chen; Lingzhong Meng; Brenton Alexander; Nam Phuong Tran; Zeev N Kain; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 9.452

5.  Intraoperative hypotension is associated with myocardial damage in noncardiac surgery: An observational study.

Authors:  Linn Hallqvist; Johan Mårtensson; Fredrik Granath; Anders Sahlén; Max Bell
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 6.  Blood Pressure Monitoring for the Anesthesiologist: A Practical Review.

Authors:  Karsten Bartels; Stephen A Esper; Robert H Thiele
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Non-invasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring with Nexfin does not sufficiently replace invasive measurements in critically ill patients.

Authors:  A Hohn; J M Defosse; S Becker; C Steffen; F Wappler; S G Sakka
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Inferior Vena Cava Ultrasonography before General Anesthesia Can Predict Hypotension after Induction.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Lester Augustus Hall Critchley
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  The impact of intraoperative hypothermia on early postoperative adverse events after radical esophagectomy for cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yamasaki; Katsuaki Tanaka; Yusuke Funai; Koichi Suehiro; Kazutake Ikenaga; Takashi Mori; Harushi Osugi; Kiyonobu Nishikawa
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 10.  Optimal perioperative management of arterial blood pressure.

Authors:  Laurent Lonjaret; Olivier Lairez; Vincent Minville; Thomas Geeraerts
Journal:  Integr Blood Press Control       Date:  2014-09-12
View more
  3 in total

1.  Usefulness of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in elderly patients undergoing monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a pilot study.

Authors:  Hae Keum Kil; In Kyeong Park; Min Sup Song; Jin Ha Park
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 2.  Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Moritz Flick; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A H Critchley; Simon T Vistisen; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Measurement of Blood Pressure by Ultrasound-The Applicability of Devices, Algorithms and a View in Local Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Moritz Meusel; Philipp Wegerich; Berit Bode; Elena Stawschenko; Kristina Kusche-Vihrog; Horst Hellbrück; Hartmut Gehring
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.